There is absolutely nothing wrong with a little constructive criticism. Overall...yes, they're doing a good job. Better than most college broadcasters I've heard (and that includes SU). But any broadcaster that can't (or won't) accept constructive criticism isn't a good broadcaster. It's what makes you better. And I say this having spent the last 10 years working in both radio and television. No one here is trying to belittle them or tear them down. It doesn't feel good to be criticized, but if you want to be a good broadcaster, get used to it.
I agree with that WNYO guys are a little fast at times. On radio, it makes it very difficult to understand. There are no pictures to go along with it. On the TV side, I think the play by play guy from the SUNYAC title game (Joe?) did a great job. I was watching with 4 people and everyone just wanted the color guy (Larry?) to stop talking. First, he was WAY louder than Joe. Second, he kept throwing out cliches...but kept getting the cliches wrong. Third, he was also talking very fast. So fast, that he often tripped over his own words.
Personally, I've always felt that the student broadcasters need much more in the way of critique. They should be airchecked after every game and told what they did well and what they could improve on. If that happens, great. If it doesn't, it should. What's the point of letting these kids do this if not to help them get better so they can make a career out of it?
Oh, and GO LAKERS!