What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Actually the GOP is doing things a little different than that. Here in Minnesota they passed a voter ID law that was vetoed by the Governor. So, they're now attempting to pass a Constitutional Amendment and get that on the ballot.

They also already have a Anti-Gay Marriage Constitutional Amendment on the Minnesota ballot this fall.

Legislation done by ballot majority is a horrible way to govern and is NOT what the founding fathers believed in or wanted. Yet, here's the party of the Founding Fathers legislating by Constitutional Amendment.
You could look at #2 as being pro traditional marriage.

But what do you say when legislation is not done by the legislature, but by the courts?

The US Constitution has been amended a number of times, generally to correct a defect or omission in the original document. I do not agree when an amendment is made at the Federal Level for social engineering purposes (ie 18 yr old vote, Prohibition, ERA, anti-abortion). Those items should be left to individual legislation, or better yet, to the States.

When you get to the State level, then if the State Constitution allows for amendment by ballot, then that is what the writers wanted. If you don't like it, amend the State Constitution. However, sometimes the ballot is the only way the wishes of the citizenry can be heard over a run amok or deaf legislature or judiciary. Therefore it is a good idea, when used in matters of grave importance. I would think the the definition of marriage is a good one to vote on. I am thinking that we're going to have a similar vote here in Maryland after the lap-dog legislature does what our ambitious governor wants them to do.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

It is sad you are probably right :(

That said I am taking Obama whatever Vegas has the odds at. He may be femmy...but he is wirey!

I think if he just reached over and messed up Romney's hair he could win on forfeit...think Mitt has ever been in a fist fight? It doesn't look like he has.

Not to say BHO looks like a tough guy either but at least he is from the Phillipines, they have a lot of good fighters there.:D
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

You could look at #2 as being pro traditional marriage.

But what do you say when legislation is not done by the legislature, but by the courts?

The US Constitution has been amended a number of times, generally to correct a defect or omission in the original document. I do not agree when an amendment is made at the Federal Level for social engineering purposes (ie 18 yr old vote, Prohibition, ERA, anti-abortion). Those items should be left to individual legislation, or better yet, to the States.

When you get to the State level, then if the State Constitution allows for amendment by ballot, then that is what the writers wanted. If you don't like it, amend the State Constitution. However, sometimes the ballot is the only way the wishes of the citizenry can be heard over a run amok or deaf legislature or judiciary. Therefore it is a good idea, when used in matters of grave importance. I would think the the definition of marriage is a good one to vote on. I am thinking that we're going to have a similar vote here in Maryland after the lap-dog legislature does what our ambitious governor wants them to do.

The Constitution should be amended rarely, very rarely. Presidential succession, elimination of slavery, etc. These are important matters. But ERA, balanced budget, right to life and all the rest should not be enshrined in our Constitution. The Volsted act is a good example of why we shouldn't clutter up the document.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

You could look at #2 as being pro traditional marriage.

Which one of Newt's marriages counts as "traditional"?

It's "traditional" for a man to have as many as 1000 wives so exactly how "traditional" do you want to get?
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

I agree, I & R is a bad way to govern. But to suggest only one side is guilty is more than stupid. You have heard of California, right? Where voters have to wade their way through a welter of ballot initiatives every election. Most of those initiatives are backed, created, supported and funded by liberals. Bottom line, it's a bad way to govern, no matter who's pushing them.

I agree. California is a special case though. How they got to the point where their doing everything at the ballot box is beyond me. I'm sure somewhere someone wrote about it. Maybe I'll find an article.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

You could look at #2 as being pro traditional marriage.

I would think the the definition of marriage is a good one to vote on. I am thinking that we're going to have a similar vote here in Maryland after the lap-dog legislature does what our ambitious governor wants them to do.

What's a traditional marriage?
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

I agree. California is a special case though. How they got to the point where their doing everything at the ballot box is beyond me. I'm sure somewhere someone wrote about it. Maybe I'll find an article.

They sent Sonny Bono to congress. Go figure.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

What's a traditional marriage?

367326568_f4ea6e96fe.jpg


Edit: I have no idea why that guy is going to try to rake barefoot, but it is not a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

367326568_f4ea6e96fe.jpg


Edit: I have no idea why that guy is going to try to rake barefoot, but it is not a good idea.
Missing 2 kids. THEN we're traditional!!!

Actually marriage is (or should be), in this day and age, in this culture, one man and one woman. That's what you need for expansion of the species.

In a different time and under different circumstances, the ratio may change due to natural disasters, pestilence, etc.. And I recognize that some cultures the ratio is different, for as the Shiek said in Ben Hur, "One God I can understand, but one wife? Hah! It is not civilized." Regardless of how you do it, you still need sperm + egg = baby.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Missing 2 kids. THEN we're traditional!!!

Actually marriage is (or should be), in this day and age, in this culture, one man and one woman. That's what you need for expansion of the species.
Why TF do you want our species to expand? Environmental destruction not happening quickly enough for you yet?
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Missing 2 kids. THEN we're traditional!!!

Actually marriage is (or should be), in this day and age, in this culture, one man and one woman. That's what you need for expansion of the species.

In a different time and under different circumstances, the ratio may change due to natural disasters, pestilence, etc.. And I recognize that some cultures the ratio is different, for as the Shiek said in Ben Hur, "One God I can understand, but one wife? Hah! It is not civilized." Regardless of how you do it, you still need sperm + egg = baby.

You don't need a man and a woman for that. Just a Petri dish and a syringe.

Next?
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Not to say BHO looks like a tough guy either but at least he is from the Phillipines, they have a lot of good fighters there.:D

Huh? The Philipines? Everyone knows he's from Kenya. Duh.
 
Why TF do you want our species to expand? Environmental destruction not happening quickly enough for you yet?
Check your history. Stop breeding and you'll be overrun by one that outproduces you.

It's a fact of nature even at the one cell level.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Check your history. Stop breeding and you'll be overrun by one that outproduces you.

It's a fact of nature even at the one cell level.
Who said anything about completely stopping to breed? I said stopping growth, which would still require 2.1 births per couple - you know, breeding. If our species remained at 7B strong, I really doubt there's any danger of losing the top spot to cockroaches any time soon.
 
Re: Obama XXII: Occupy the White House

Clearly got Tim Tebow and Barack Obama messed up.

2008 Savior: Barack Obama
2011 Savior: Tim Tebow

has anyone confirmed obama wasn't in the Phillipines 25 years ago +/-?

"One Night In Manilla"...wasn't there a song like that?????:eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top