Well there was "Midnight at the Oasis". That may explain a few things....has anyone confirmed obama wasn't in the Phillipines 25 years ago +/-?
"One Night In Manilla"...wasn't there a song like that?????
Well there was "Midnight at the Oasis". That may explain a few things....has anyone confirmed obama wasn't in the Phillipines 25 years ago +/-?
"One Night In Manilla"...wasn't there a song like that?????
You can make Sperm and eggs out of thin air?
In a different time and under different circumstances, the ratio may change due to natural disasters, pestilence, etc.. And I recognize that some cultures the ratio is different, for as the Shiek said in Ben Hur, "One God I can understand, but one wife? Hah! It is not civilized." Regardless of how you do it, you still need sperm + egg = baby.
But did its water break?So that argument in favor of "traditional" marriage holds no water.
Check your history. Stop breeding and you'll be overrun by one that outproduces you.
It's a fact of nature even at the one cell level.
Check your history. Stop breeding and you'll be overrun by one that outproduces you.
It's a fact of nature even at the one cell level.
I gotta know. What species is going to overrun us?
Doesn't have to be a species. Germany had a significant advantage in the Franco-Prussian war because their frau and frauleins were outproducing the madams and madamoiselles.I gotta know. What species is going to overrun us?
Natural Law?Yes, wally, didn't you know that?
Point is, you don't need marriage, "traditional" or otherwise, to propagate the human race. So that argument in favor of "traditional" marriage holds no water.
So the definition of "traditional" marriage changes over time...
What's your next reason not allowing gay marriage?
Natural Law?
Natural Law?
Natural Law?
Doesn't have to be a species. Germany had a significant advantage in the Franco-Prussian war because their frau and frauleins were outproducing the madams and madamoiselles.
And eventually population pressure will force the human race to emigrate (you can accuse me of being tinfoil or a nut job) because you can't afford to have all your eggs in one basket.
Yes, wally, didn't you know that?
Point is, you don't need marriage, "traditional" or otherwise, to propagate the human race. So that argument in favor of "traditional" marriage holds no water.
So the definition of "traditional" marriage changes over time...
What's your next reason not allowing gay marriage?
What is wrong with civil unions / ensuring the same legal rights as "traditional" marriage. Then wouldn't both sides be happy?
You could give marraige to the churches to do what they want, no rights or strings attached. If you want rights whether your straight or gay, go get a civil union from the gov.
That will never do because the reps want to restrict rights, and the dems just want to whine.
What is wrong with civil unions / ensuring the same legal rights as "traditional" marriage. Then wouldn't both sides be happy?
What's wrong with separate but equal? Sure they're separate, but they are equal.What is wrong with civil unions / ensuring the same legal rights as "traditional" marriage. Then wouldn't both sides be happy?
What is wrong with civil unions / ensuring the same legal rights as "traditional" marriage. Then wouldn't both sides be happy?
I just don't see the point of arguing the philosophical meaning of marriage in a political arena
I just don't see the point of arguing the philosophical meaning of marriage in a political arena