I'm with ya, with the crappy leadership we're getting on Libya, budget/subsidies, energy and everything else I'm still in the mood to throw em all out.I wouldn't **** on either side if they were on fire.
The White house had time to do that while Obama was making out his bracket, multitasking at its best
no complaints, just thought it was funny.President Obama’s only event at the White House that isn’t closed to the press on Wednesday is a ceremony in which he’ll accept an award for being open to the press.
What's striking to me is how many American conservatives actually long for the exercize of brute force or constant executive action in the face of a dramatically changing world. This they call strength - even after the debacles of Bush's executive whims. They see the role of an American president as mastering the world, controlling events, forcing everything through the prism of post-war American hegemony. But that hegemony is over, partly because of America's success in defeating the Soviets and China's and India's successes in forging a new economic order. The kind of hegemony Nixon or Reagan enjoyed was an accident of history. It will not be regained, by the laws of economics, and demography.
Speaking of Libya, the image that's been floating through my mind while this administration dithers
If only the Chimperor had spent more time filling out brackets.
"Chimperor"? Even I'm uneasy with that, and I've never been called PC.
Who all thinks it was right to fire Gilbert Gottfried for his "insensitive" joke?
I don't know. As I say, this situation is resolving instelf with Gadaffi killing or imprisoning all the rebels. If that's what we want, that's what we're getting. So I guess it's another triumph. Perhaps, instead of bowing to Gadaffi, the president could kneel. That might work.
Why should we do anything? What business is it of ours? How much money do we have to spend fixing everyone else's **** before we start fixing our own???
A company that does a huge percentage of its business in Japan.
An insurance company that does a huge percentage of its business in Japan has more important things to worry about. Like, where the hell are they going to get all the money for the inevitable flood of claims coming their way. I think it was State Farm (?) that insured a heck of a lot in the deep south when Katrina hit. Their insurance premiums shot up nationwide the following year.
That's true. You wonder whether policy holders in Japan (especially now) even know who Gottfried is and whether, under the circumstances, they would care. The question was asked who would fire him, the answer is a company that does a huge percentage of its business in Japan. That doesn't mean the decision wasn't a hysterical overreaction.
Is it bad if I thought most of the jokes he made were hilarious?