Re: Obama XIV: President VISTA with SP2
I understand. but it's illogical and self-refuting like most religions and their leaders and arguments based on religious grounds.
"If I won't tolerate their views, I should not expect mine to be tolerated either"
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/tolerance.html
Tolerance starts at home. If they won't tolerate my views, they should not expect to have theirs tolerated either.
I understand. but it's illogical and self-refuting like most religions and their leaders and arguments based on religious grounds.
"If I won't tolerate their views, I should not expect mine to be tolerated either"
http://www.christiananswers.net/q-eden/tolerance.html
The new definition of 'tolerance' makes the Christian claims to exclusivity 'intolerant', which supposedly justifies much of the anti-Christianity in the media and the education system.
But this argument is glaringly illogical and self-refuting. That is, if these 'tolerance' advocates reject Christianity, then they are not treating this belief as 'equal'. So, in practice, to paraphrase George Orwell in Animal Farm, all beliefs are equal, but some beliefs are more equal than others. The result is extreme intolerance towards Christianity from people who talk so much about tolerating all views. In short, they are intolerant of intolerance, so logically they should be intolerant of themselves!
Our conclusions must be based on the foundation of God's Word, not on fallible human opinion!