Re: Obama XI: Turn And Face The Strange
This wouldn't be an issue if people didn't look to the government for the solutions to their problems. Once upon a time, people played the cards they were dealt and tried to make their way through life the best they could. Once the government started providing assistance via entitlement programs, a continuously growing percentage of citizens stopped worrying about the necessities (food, housing, retirement.....and soon-to-be lifelong health care) and started spending frivolously. Granted, this most likely contributed to a portion of the economic growth over the last half century, but we're now looking at liabilities which cannot be funded without potentially-crippling tax increases on the backs of the current shrinking taxpayer base.
Look at most any tinder box political issue and you'll find an issue in which people are looking for a solution to be provided by the government via intervention in private matters......usually by means of the distribution of taxpayer money. As you pointed out, the election of Jackson started the haves vs. have-nots voting pattern; this divide is only growing more and more apparent with each generation since the New Deal.
That isn't what I'm saying at all. I'm saying the more say the people (i.e. the Average Joe) have in how the government is run, or the more representative the government becomes to the people, the less respect people have for government. That doesn't mean democracy is a failure or, even if it were, that it still isn't superior to any other system. It says democracy may eat its own legitimacy -- a spectacular case of familiarity breeding contempt.
I'm not advocating stepping back from democracy; I'm advocating people start to suck it up and realize that the problems of our government come directly from the problems of 300 million people trying to find compromises, particularly when about 200 million of them feel they have a god-given right to demand no compromise.
This wouldn't be an issue if people didn't look to the government for the solutions to their problems. Once upon a time, people played the cards they were dealt and tried to make their way through life the best they could. Once the government started providing assistance via entitlement programs, a continuously growing percentage of citizens stopped worrying about the necessities (food, housing, retirement.....and soon-to-be lifelong health care) and started spending frivolously. Granted, this most likely contributed to a portion of the economic growth over the last half century, but we're now looking at liabilities which cannot be funded without potentially-crippling tax increases on the backs of the current shrinking taxpayer base.
Look at most any tinder box political issue and you'll find an issue in which people are looking for a solution to be provided by the government via intervention in private matters......usually by means of the distribution of taxpayer money. As you pointed out, the election of Jackson started the haves vs. have-nots voting pattern; this divide is only growing more and more apparent with each generation since the New Deal.