USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Obama V: For Vendetta
- Thread starter Red Cloud
- Start date
- Status
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Pink potacos
Pink potacos
MinnesotaNorthStar
Minding the gap
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
French Fries.
Socialist Spuds?
Pinko Potatoes?
Boomshakalalakaboom! ...
French Fries.
omahasioux1
New member
omahasioux1
New member
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Good Van Jones clips finally go mainstream.
Good Van Jones clips finally go mainstream.
omahasioux1
New member
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
"Judge me by the people I surround myself with." What a great quote.
"Judge me by the people I surround myself with." What a great quote.
St. Clown
Ideas Posted are Likely Not My Own
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
I've only been following all this hype on the peripheries, but I thought the issue was less with the president's speech and more with the idea that the talking points sent out by the Dept. of Education were written in a manner that lead children less towards critical thinking of what the president said more towards being his supporter.
I've only been following all this hype on the peripheries, but I thought the issue was less with the president's speech and more with the idea that the talking points sent out by the Dept. of Education were written in a manner that lead children less towards critical thinking of what the president said more towards being his supporter.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
I think the biggest unspoken issue is that when you give Obama time to perform a prepared speech he is simply outstanding. Obama probably didn't get much air time in many districts, but the "no excuses" and personal responsibility should have been welcomed by any family.
I think the biggest unspoken issue is that when you give Obama time to perform a prepared speech he is simply outstanding. Obama probably didn't get much air time in many districts, but the "no excuses" and personal responsibility should have been welcomed by any family.
SPIN CONTROL
is in charge
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Critical of the U.S. government? The man signed a document that alleges the Presidentof the United States killed 3000 of his own citizens. I am not sure what world you live in but here on planet Earth that is not "being critical" of the U.S. governmnet that is being bat guano *** crazy. Anyone who believes such a thing has no place working in the government, period.
Critical of the U.S. government? The man signed a document that alleges the Presidentof the United States killed 3000 of his own citizens. I am not sure what world you live in but here on planet Earth that is not "being critical" of the U.S. governmnet that is being bat guano *** crazy. Anyone who believes such a thing has no place working in the government, period.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
The Obama speech "controversy" boils down to complaining it's harder to indoctrinate your kids if they're exposed to reality. The hard core will self-select by homeschooling their kids and raising a cult who think the Earth is 6000 years old.
The world needs ditch diggers too.
The Obama speech "controversy" boils down to complaining it's harder to indoctrinate your kids if they're exposed to reality. The hard core will self-select by homeschooling their kids and raising a cult who think the Earth is 6000 years old.
The world needs ditch diggers too.
Last edited:
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
SPIN CONTROL
is in charge
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Here is a shocker.... complaining about speeches to students is nothing new.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...rats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html
"The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," said Richard Gephardt,
"As the chairman of the committee charged with the authorization and implementation of education programs, I am very much interested in the justification, rationale for giving the White House scarce education funds to produce a media event."
Here is a shocker.... complaining about speeches to students is nothing new.
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/o...rats-investigated-held-hearings-57694347.html
"The Department of Education should not be producing paid political advertising for the president, it should be helping us to produce smarter students," said Richard Gephardt,
"As the chairman of the committee charged with the authorization and implementation of education programs, I am very much interested in the justification, rationale for giving the White House scarce education funds to produce a media event."
Last edited:
Jon
Say, this is nice.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
That works both ways.
"Judge me by the people I surround myself with." What a great quote.
That works both ways.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
ScottM
**** it feels good to be a bankster
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
He talked a good deal about that in his campaigns, and he made certain entrenched factions in the black community a bit uncomfortable as I recall. If he wants to preach "no excuses and personal responsibility" he should be talking to adults as well.
He talked a good deal about that in his campaigns, and he made certain entrenched factions in the black community a bit uncomfortable as I recall. If he wants to preach "no excuses and personal responsibility" he should be talking to adults as well.
Kepler
Cornell Big Red
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
His Father's Day speech and his stump speech stressed personal responsibility for parents.
His Father's Day speech and his stump speech stressed personal responsibility for parents.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Good points by Thomas Sowell
While I think the title is a bit strong, he does bring up some good points about how Obama has hurt his credibility.
Good points by Thomas Sowell
While I think the title is a bit strong, he does bring up some good points about how Obama has hurt his credibility.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta
Wow, these two are so in lockstep with whatever the DNC tells you to say, it's comical lol. Let me thank them for making me feel good today about being an independant - it's not as easy but I enjoy being able to arrive at my own opinion.
Now mookie is a good example of how dangerous it can get if extreme liberals ever attain power. (oh wait....) Nevermind my opinions, nevermind that lunatic's political ideology - for someone to suggest us dirty commoners should keep our mouths shut about asking a radical to step down is disgraceful. So with mookie and Obama telling ordinary Americans to shut up and keep our opinions to ourselves, what does that tell you about how those hard left types feel about freedom in general and the First Amendment in particular? If you ever get the feeling the extreme left wished the First Amendment didn't apply to everyone, well their words do kind of support that feeling, no?
Now let's talk about this clown named Van. To me, this is almost as moronic and scary of making Michael Moore a czar of something. (say, Czar of Nonbiased and Truthful Information? ) It shows alot about those that march to the tune of the DNC when they defend someone like this jerk. This guy is a communist who has shown unmasked contempt for whitey and for America. (Yet these two are defending him, like it's nothing more than criticizing big government, as they have tried to compare it to.) For the nonradical mainstream, it's plainly obvious that this idiot isn't fit to have the President's ear. For once, the President made a good decision - reluctantly, I'm sure - to kick this guy to the curb.
Of course, Obama's quest for power has bloated the executive branch's command over society to dizzying heights. 30+ czars with massive authority, Obama's ear, and they have zero accountability to the American public. And more than one of them are clowns just as radical as him on the expanded 30+ roster of people - they need to be purged as well.
Oh yeah, and Lynah.... to answer your first question, it's really an easy one for most Americans.... Your boy Van is a communist - you already know that and are cool with it. Here's the thing about commies though, and maybe you weren't aware of this.... you see, communists kinda suck at the whole capitalism/entrepreneurialism thing so that might just affect his ability to create jobs, green or otherwise, in some eensy teensy little way, ya know?
Which parts of these things are illegal? Which parts of these things affect his ability to perform his Green Jobs promotion role?
Edit: I'm guessing there were more than a few people in a Bush/Reagan administration that had said things critical of the US government, given that, you know, they're the party that is allegedly always trying to reign in its power...
Wow, these two are so in lockstep with whatever the DNC tells you to say, it's comical lol. Let me thank them for making me feel good today about being an independant - it's not as easy but I enjoy being able to arrive at my own opinion.
Now mookie is a good example of how dangerous it can get if extreme liberals ever attain power. (oh wait....) Nevermind my opinions, nevermind that lunatic's political ideology - for someone to suggest us dirty commoners should keep our mouths shut about asking a radical to step down is disgraceful. So with mookie and Obama telling ordinary Americans to shut up and keep our opinions to ourselves, what does that tell you about how those hard left types feel about freedom in general and the First Amendment in particular? If you ever get the feeling the extreme left wished the First Amendment didn't apply to everyone, well their words do kind of support that feeling, no?
Now let's talk about this clown named Van. To me, this is almost as moronic and scary of making Michael Moore a czar of something. (say, Czar of Nonbiased and Truthful Information?
) It shows alot about those that march to the tune of the DNC when they defend someone like this jerk. This guy is a communist who has shown unmasked contempt for whitey and for America. (Yet these two are defending him, like it's nothing more than criticizing big government, as they have tried to compare it to.) For the nonradical mainstream, it's plainly obvious that this idiot isn't fit to have the President's ear. For once, the President made a good decision - reluctantly, I'm sure - to kick this guy to the curb. Of course, Obama's quest for power has bloated the executive branch's command over society to dizzying heights. 30+ czars with massive authority, Obama's ear, and they have zero accountability to the American public. And more than one of them are clowns just as radical as him on the expanded 30+ roster of people - they need to be purged as well.
Oh yeah, and Lynah.... to answer your first question, it's really an easy one for most Americans.... Your boy Van is a communist - you already know that and are cool with it. Here's the thing about commies though, and maybe you weren't aware of this.... you see, communists kinda suck at the whole capitalism/entrepreneurialism thing so that might just affect his ability to create jobs, green or otherwise, in some eensy teensy little way, ya know?
- Status