What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Obama V: For Vendetta

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Kepler said:
You can't have it both ways. If you're going to give Bush a break by not counting inherited policies and entitlement growth and downsized revenue caused by the recession, then that pretty much zeroes out Obama's $9T.
Click to expand...
If you're going to compare Bush deficits to Obama (projected) deficits, then you should either exclude unfunded entitlements from both or include them in both. The article included them in the Bush numbers but not in Obama's. That's not an accurate comparison. If the article had included unfunded entitlement projections in Obama's numbers, I suspect the final number would have been approaching 100 trillion, maybe more.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

GoBlackBears said:
How you doing XYZ?
Click to expand...

Hey GBB, missed you on here- how's the headaches?

(((spoiler alert)))
The Mrs. and I saw Inglorious Basterds the other night, you'll be as pi*sed as I was when you see them shootin' up the Führer! :eek:
 
Last edited:
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

MCFan16 said:
Hey GBB, missed you on here- how's the headaches?

The Mrs. and I saw Inglorious Basterds the other night, you'll be as pi*sed as I was when you see them shootin' up the Führer! :eek:
Click to expand...

WHAT ARE YOU DOING!!?!?!? DON'T RUIN THE MOVIE BY GIVING AWAY ANY PLOT OR ENDING!!!!!

:p
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

mookie1995 said:
WHAT ARE YOU DOING!!?!?!? DON'T RUIN THE MOVIE BY GIVING AWAY ANY PLOT OR ENDING!!!!!

:p
Click to expand...

lol Sorry, I won't say anymore about it, I just figured no one reads my posts anyway..it was an interesting movie, for sure. I was just trying to bait my friend into some more Aryan rants. Been a lil boring in here for awhile..
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Kepler said:
Some (Bush Sr., Dubya) are dealt a great hand, some (Reagan, Obama) are dealt a terrible one, and after the dust settles we'll judge based on where he took the country from there.
Click to expand...

I know this is cliche, but put the bong down.

W messed up in more ways than I care to enumerate, but he was dealt 2,4,8,9,J off-suit.....a pile of foreign affairs dung, care of WJC.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Bill said:
If you're going to compare Bush deficits to Obama (projected) deficits, then you should either exclude unfunded entitlements from both or include them in both. The article included them in the Bush numbers but not in Obama's. That's not an accurate comparison. If the article had included unfunded entitlement projections in Obama's numbers, I suspect the final number would have been approaching 100 trillion, maybe more.
Click to expand...

Exactly; I couldn't say it any more clearly. Remember, with the $timulu$ bill Obama created in his first couple months in office more debt than GW added in 8 years. And he's eager to accelerate our national bankruptcy way beyond anything ever seen.
"Obama: Like Bush, but much much worse."
also, The Onion has a funny headline here: http://www.theonion.com/content/from_print/kennedy_curse_claims_life_of?utm_source=slate_rss_1
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

ScoobyDoo said:
LOL, now that's funny.
Click to expand...

8 years of him, Christopher and Albright produced zero foreign affairs results in any hotspot - save for Northern Ireland (WJC did an outstanding job on his own) and the Baltics (NATO). Neither of those were a threat to the U.S.

Iran, Iraq, Syria, NK, the 'Stans, Taliban, AQ, et al, were left unchecked and running hog-wild.

Hence, the pile of foreign-affairs dung handed to the next guy.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

dropthatpuck said:
8 years of him, Christopher and Albright produced zero foreign affairs results in any hotspot - save for Northern Ireland (WJC did an outstanding job on his own) and the Baltics (NATO). Neither of those were a threat to the U.S.

Iran, Iraq, Syria, NK, the 'Stans, Taliban, AQ, et al, were left unchecked and running hog-wild.

Hence, the pile of foreign-affairs dung handed to the next guy.
Click to expand...

And after 8 years of "W" the World hates us more than they ever have. So, not only did Obama end up with the second largest domestic mess of all time, but also the second largest foreign affairs mess of all time.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

ScoobyDoo said:
And after 8 years of "W" the World hates us more than they ever have. So, not only did Obama end up with the second largest domestic mess of all time, but also the second largest foreign affairs mess of all time.
Click to expand...

Yes, keep indulging in those delusions of grandeur.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

dropthatpuck said:
Yes, keep indulging in those delusions of grandeur.
Click to expand...

So W inherited a mess for foreign affairs but Obama didn't...is that what you are going with here? Just want to be clear seeing as you deny being a Bush lover yet you came out with this gem...

:D
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

ScoobyDoo said:
And after 8 years of "W" the World hates us more than they ever have. So, not only did Obama end up with the second largest domestic mess of all time, but also the second largest foreign affairs mess of all time.
Click to expand...
Somehow I think the 1930's were worse.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

Handyman said:
So W inherited a mess for foreign affairs but Obama didn't...is that what you are going with here? Just want to be clear seeing as you deny being a Bush lover yet you came out with this gem...

:D
Click to expand...

You have a penchant for not even trying to be objective.

http://board.uscho.com/showpost.php?p=4360181&postcount=387


ScoobyDoo said:
That's why I said second.


He's pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Funny is you saying Obama has the 2nd worse foreign affairs mess. He doesn't even register. Ike, Truman, JFK, Teddy, Washington, Nixon, LBJ.....and that's for starters. All Obama's done is put Hill in charge (sort of).

Lincoln also had it on easy street with domestic affairs considering we only lost over 600,000 U.S. citizens in the civil war and all.

Have we hit record inflation yet? How about 20% interest rates? Gas lines?.....didn't think so.

Your guy and the thugs in the beltway are making things worse, not better. Obama had a crappy hand with the economy, but he and he alone is making it worse. Like Carter, he has no coherent plan to improve things.

Drop the distance learning and pick up some history books....Chester Arthur had it easier.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

dropthatpuck said:
Funny is you saying Obama has the 2nd worse foreign affairs mess. He doesn't even register. Ike, Truman, JFK, Teddy, Washington, Nixon, LBJ.....and that's for starters. All Obama's done is put Hill in charge (sort of).

Lincoln also had it on easy street with domestic affairs considering we only lost over 600,000 U.S. citizens in the civil war and all.

Have we hit record inflation yet? How about 20% interest rates? Gas lines?.....didn't think so.

Your guy and the thugs in the beltway are making things worse, not better. Obama had a crappy hand with the economy, but he and he alone is making it worse. Like Carter, he has no coherent plan to improve things.

Drop the distance learning and pick up some history books....Chester Arthur had it easier.
Click to expand...

Yet, W drew a 2,4,8,9,J off-suit. Wow, I guess things have been really awful over the years then. And apparently Obama drew a better hand after "W"? Really. Ok, whatever you say man.
 
Re: Obama V: For Vendetta

dropthatpuck said:
You have a penchant for not even trying to be objective.
Click to expand...

Wow..if that isnt the pot calling the kettle black nothing is :D And who should I be objective for...I back Bush Jr. in his BS early on and I backed Obama at first...now I dislike them both so maybe you should take that dollar out of your pocket and buy a clue :p

So who is to blame for the messes in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan and so on? I am sure in your mind that is all stuff that you can lay at the feet of Obama even though it was your hero who made them all worse. Keep trying though :D

You make me laugh though so you got that going for you :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top