Re: Norwich Cadets '13-14 - A New Look Forward
My only observation being a loyal Cadet fan is , that it seems like the last 2 or even 3 years I am starting to feel like the Cadets are playing better in the first part of the year than the end. In the past they always seemed to get better and better. You have to wander just a bit if the Coach is not losing his touch a bit. If I am a scout on Norwich it seems quite simple just stay around the goal get ready they will hit you with shots like a machine gun, once you weather the storm , just relax they will make a mistake and then we go in and score. They may get 40 or 50 shots on goal but not to worry they are of a poor quality. That is how all teams seem to be beating Norwich. They seem very dysfunctional at best.But for my eyes they were playing much better earlier in the season. It 's not suppose to work that way. I hope they can find there way soon. And let us not forget that the last time they went all the way was with mostly Freshman, so lets not go there with this team.
Hi Roy:
If we were discussing this Cadet team over a beer as a fellow fan I would understand your disappointments. Nor would I question your loyalty But had you made the argument above in quotes----I would have replied, "
Hey, lets be fair."
First I am not so sure the team was any better earlier in the eason because the biggest complaint I heard back then was their play making and passing was beautiful but they needed to take more shots.
As for getting enough shots—but complaining that they are not quality shots...well in truth that remark really escapes me.
A week or so I said on this forum, "
Actually, if you eliminate the two very weak teams that got less that ten SOG on NU--all the rest (19 teams) collectively have averaged only 19+ SOG verses 38 SOG for NU." But you now question the quality of our SOGs.
Roy, do you really sense that opposing coaches are telling their teams:
"They (NU) may get 40 or 50 shots on goal but not to worry they are of a poor quality."?.
To that I would say that some how does not translate to the facts. How does any coach claim that against the statistics that NU leads the ECAC-E in scoring (3.69) and in defense (1.50). And as I also said last week, "
We are certainly getting the shots but we just need some breaks." Last weekend with the same 2:1 ratio of NU SOG vs. Friday and Saturday’s opponents—we did not get a break against Castleton but did against Skidmore.
Now I do keep hearing on the broadcasts or see at games how good the goal tending has been against the Cadets and how opponents are jamming up the middle. I also see us drawing too many penalties at the wrong time. All that I get.
In conclusion Roy--- let me get this straight regarding McShane.
After 15 years and fifteen straight ECAC-E Regular Season Titles, ten ECAC-E Championship Titles, and 12 visits to the NCAA Finals that includes three national titles—McShane is now losing his touch? Really? The man has 29 players on a team where there are 15 freshmen (52% of the team are “newbees”). It is not like he can go up in the barracks and recruit some experience. And yet with a club that might be a bit better with a bit more experience—McShane has still managed to post a 15-3-5 record (ECAC-E 11-3-2). And actually within the ECAC-E, one might suggest that the only coach right now with a better record is Jamie Rice at Babson—a team we beat in Fenway.
Roy we are all fans of the same team. But lets not get caught up in that nonsense that Bill Beaney at Middlebury did a few years back where ever other remark on USCHOL was to hang Beaney in effigy--a many who won 8 NCAA titles. McShane and this team deserve our support right now. What's more the last word I would not use to describe them is dysfunctional--that is entirely unfair.
But you know that. Your pal. Old Rook