Re: Northeastern Huskies 2011-2012 Season Thread: Year of the Mad Dog
I'm somewhere in the middle on this one. I think this team is better than Cronin's 3 win/first year team, but not as good a team as "Rossi" seems to believe it is. As Bill Parcells used to say - "you are what your record says you are". This team isn't nearly as good as the team that missed the playoffs two seasons ago. Lack of offensive firepower, poor special teams (do we lead College Hockey in shorthanded goals allowed?), iffy goaltending, and questionable direction from the Administration. Given all of that, why even hammer Madigan and staff? Let things play out (as if we have a choice) and see how next year develops. There has to be some positive growth next season, or maybe it will be time to drag the Coaches into question, too.
I'm somewhere in the middle on this one. I think this team is better than Cronin's 3 win/first year team, but not as good a team as "Rossi" seems to believe it is. As Bill Parcells used to say - "you are what your record says you are". This team isn't nearly as good as the team that missed the playoffs two seasons ago. Lack of offensive firepower, poor special teams (do we lead College Hockey in shorthanded goals allowed?), iffy goaltending, and questionable direction from the Administration. Given all of that, why even hammer Madigan and staff? Let things play out (as if we have a choice) and see how next year develops. There has to be some positive growth next season, or maybe it will be time to drag the Coaches into question, too.