It's pretty funny to see people twist themselves so much, trying to take down the quarterback who has been to the most SB's and that has won the most SBs.
And I think most of that is because they are in the SB so much. Face it.
As of the game next week, Tom Brady will have started more SB's than any other team has even been there- 9 for Brady, 8 for the Steelers.
And as of now, Tom has 5 WINS vs. the Steelers 6. One QB's era vs. an entire team.
Technically, Rogers may be a better thrower. Technically. Big deal.
And so what if Belechek is a huge part of the reason. Had Bradshaw not had Chuck Knoll, or Montana Bill Walsh- where would they be? Everyone benefits by a system that fits REALLY well.
And I don't get why Manning is even brought up...
As a Lions fan, I certainly don't like seeing the Pats constantly winning, too. And I have zero empathy to any other fan who thinks they should be in SB's more often when they've been there before. I can't stand any NE based fan- their BS over the Sox when the Cubs issues had been longer and far worse killed me. They are the whiniest set of fans in the US.
But I can't come up with any realistic alternative to Tom Brady as the best ever.