What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Rush Limbaugh dropped from group bidding on Rams... blames Obama.

nice.

He's just a typical American, refusing to take responsibility for what he does.

He knows that he is controversial and a criminal, why should people want him to be associated with the NFL?

You're entitled to your opinion Rush, but you can't have your cake and to eat it too. People hate you, and really don't like what you represent. NFL wants no part of that controversy.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

He knows that he is controversial and a criminal, why should people want him to be associated with the NFL?

Because he'd fit right in with the other controversial criminals that nobody in the NFL seems to have as much of a problem with?

Perhaps he should have killed some dogs, or run down a pedestrian in the street. :rolleyes:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Because he'd fit right in with the other controversial criminals that nobody in the NFL seems to have as much of a problem with?

Perhaps he should have killed some dogs, or run down a pedestrian in the street. :rolleyes:

he didn't even get the chance to load up the pads and helmets in a van and sneak outta town in the middle of the night.;)
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Because he'd fit right in with the other controversial criminals that nobody in the NFL seems to have as much of a problem with?

Perhaps he should have killed some dogs, or run down a pedestrian in the street. :rolleyes:

I'm guessing the main difference was that the NFL was more or less convinced that, after reinstatement, it could count on Vick to keep quiet or talk the talk.

Compare that to the probability of Limbaugh being an ongoing distraction and you're right. There's no comparison at all.

I'm not convinced it wasn't a publicity stunt by a guy w/ a martyrdom complex. I'm not crying for Limbaugh. He got what he wanted.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I'm guessing the main difference was that the NFL was more or less convinced that, after reinstatement, it could count on Vick to keep quiet or talk the talk.

Compare that to the probability of Limbaugh being an ongoing distraction and you're right. There's no comparison at all.

I'm not convinced it wasn't a publicity stunt by a guy w/ a martyrdom complex.

I'm sure every other owner (or ownership group) is squeaky clean, though.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I'm sure every other owner (or ownership group) is squeaky clean, though.

It's beside the point. Nobody's ever going to know. Because they don't have the spotlight of a broadcast empire shining on them. Limbaugh does. In terms of maintaining a brand and an image, Limbaugh is just riskier.

Why should the NFL court risk unnecessarily? The status quo ain't exactly broken.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

It's beside the point. Nobody's ever going to know. Because they don't have the spotlight of a broadcast empire shining on them. Limbaugh does.

True. But it wasn't like he was THE owner. He was part of a group. Personally, I don't care who owns a team, if that person (or group) keeps that team entity separate from what s/he does for a living: in the case of Rush, if he didn't use his show to promo the Rams, or use the Rams to spout off on whatever, then let him be part of the ownership group. Big deal.

That's all I'm saying.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Actually, I'm glad he's out of the picture. For me, the NFL is an escape from politics. For a few hours each week, I'm happy to stop caring about political debates.

It's not just because he's conservative -- I wouldn't want to have to hear about, say, Michael Moore either.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Actually, I'm glad he's out of the picture. For me, the NFL is an escape from politics. For a few hours each week, I'm happy to stop caring about political debates.

It's not just because he's conservative -- I wouldn't want to have to hear about, say, Michael Moore either.

And if Michael Moore decided he wanted to buy a team, more power to him, provided he followed my guidelines stated in my previous post. And I think he's a sensationalist pig. Even if he bought the Bills. Yep. I said it.:eek:
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I'm not convinced it wasn't a publicity stunt by a guy w/ a martyrdom complex. I'm not crying for Limbaugh. He got what he wanted.
He wanted to be part owner of the team. He grew up in the St. Louis area, he used to show up to Vikings games all the time when Red McCombs owned the team, sat in the owner's box with him. The man enjoys the sport and wanted to get that much closer to it.

That said, he's far too outspoken for the owners to take him into their club. It's slightly ironic that being the loudmouthed pot-stirrer simultaneously put him in the position to contribute to an ownership group and removed him from that same group.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Rush is thinking too small-time. He could buy the entire UFL if he wanted to. He should focus on that.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I'm not convinced it wasn't a publicity stunt by a guy w/ a martyrdom complex. I'm not crying for Limbaugh. He got what he wanted.

I'm not crying for him, either, and the publicity-stunt theory makes some sense. However, the NFL trying to hold the moral high ground here is laughable.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I think Rush should try to buy an NHL franchise, Bettman would probably have an anurysm if Limbaugh and Balsillie end up owning NHL franchises.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I'm not crying for him, either, and the publicity-stunt theory makes some sense. However, the NFL trying to hold the moral high ground here is laughable.

Yeah. He was dumb using drugs. He should have gotten drunk, run someone over and killed some dogs before heading home. And if asked about it, said he didn't see nuthin'
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Because he'd fit right in with the other controversial criminals that nobody in the NFL seems to have as much of a problem with?

Perhaps he should have killed some dogs, or run down a pedestrian in the street. :rolleyes:

Last time I checked there's a higher standard for owners then for players.

There is a select group of guys who can play in the NFL, the NFL also can't turn down these guys from playing: they have no other means of making money really. The NFL can always find enough rich guys/girls who want to own a piece of an NFL team, plus very few people own sports franchises to make money on them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top