What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

And then imagine what would have happened if you'd have started Cedric Benson.
 
St. Clown said:
And then imagine what would have happened if you'd have started Cedric Benson.
Click to expand...

I'd have 18 guaranteed points instead of what I'll get from Ricky Williams. It doesn't help that Dallas decided not to use Barber that much and the Vikings barely used AP today. :mad: :p
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Nice job by McDaniels to go "wild horse" on Belichick to start the game.

I'm not as sure of New England as the media seems to be...
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

I don't want to hear crap about the Lions being terrible. The Raiders and Rams are both epically bad.

The Browns and Bills might not be far behind. How awful would it have been to be at that game? Barf.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Thanks Favre. You're useless.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

GreatLakerMohawk said:
I don't want to hear crap about the Lions being terrible. The Raiders and Rams are both epically bad.

The Browns and Bills might not be far behind. How awful would it have been to be at that game? Barf.
Click to expand...

Derek Anderson had two completions the whole game and won it? The only reason the Browns won was because the Bills fumbled a punt at their own 20? What a disaster of a game.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Dirty said:
Derek Anderson had two completions the whole game and won it? The only reason the Browns won was because the Bills fumbled a punt at their own 20? What a disaster of a game.
Click to expand...

It was 6-3. That's beyond horrible because you know daamn well that neither teams defense is that good. Just... Awful.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

Someone wake up Gregg Easterbrook.

Broncos kick a FG on 4th and inches at the NE 5yd line. There's an easy two-paragraph copy&paste job.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

That guy who just INT'd the ball for SF is about to get a fistful of Singletary.

He gets the INT, and then showboats a little on the return and fumbles it. Falcons recover.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

For those of you adjusting for mondo refereeing screwups, the final score of the Giants/Raiders game today was New York 51, Oakland 0.
 
Re: NFL 2009 (or, in Super Bowl nomenclature, MMIX)

GreatLakerMohawk said:
I don't want to hear crap about the Lions being terrible. The Raiders and Rams are both epically bad.

The Browns and Bills might not be far behind. How awful would it have been to be at that game? Barf.
Click to expand...

Dang straight. At least the Lions occasionally look like a NFL team this year.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top