What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

New WCHA is dead

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do the numbers support the argument that if the rest of the league didn't s**t the bed in NC that LSSU still doesn't improve it's PWR enough to make the tournament?

That was my point. LSSU didn’t get in because they had heavy flatulence during foreplay while in the conference bed, as opposed to a full on bed ****ting in non-conference play. So yeah, if UAH, UAA, UAF, Bemidji, Ferris, Tech, and NMU don’t go a combined 7-37-4 in non-con play last season it probably would have helped LSSU. The narrative that just the three castaways are everything wrong with the WCHA and its PWR is false.

If the goal here is to get all of you special seven in the NCAA’s, it ain’t going to happen with four of you only winning one or two non-con games.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

That was my point. LSSU didn’t get in because they had heavy flatulence during foreplay while in the conference bed, as opposed to a full on bed ****ting in non-conference play. So yeah, if UAH, UAA, UAF, Bemidji, Ferris, Tech, and NMU don’t go a combined 7-37-4 in non-con play last season it probably would have helped LSSU. The narrative that just the three castaways are everything wrong with the WCHA and its PWR is false.

If the goal here is to get all of you special seven in the NCAA’s, it ain’t going to happen with four of you only winning one or two non-con games.

I'd be curious to see how much money these schools were all spending on travel to UAA, UAF and UAH. I'd wager that its cost plus record thing with these three schools, they are just not good enough to be worth the cost of travel. Of course this is a mute point as the budget cuts have killed the AK programs anyways, wouldn't be surprised if they fold before the exit process is up.
 
Eligibility for the B1G is largely based upon financial endowments and strong academic reputations. Big Ten member institutions feature enrollments of 30,000 or more students and are predominantly major flagship research universities. There is literally no interest from the B1G in pursuing a criteria of balancing the league with an even number of teams.

B1G affiliate John Hopkins annually receives close to $2 billion in federally funded research grants, which is about twice as much as any other institution of higher learning in the US. The addition of Notre Dame to B1G hockey strengthened the league both internally and from a national perspective. It renewed some historic rivalries in the sport (From 1971-81 in the WCHA, Notre Dame competed against fellow league members Michigan, Michigan State, Minnesota and Wisconsin) and is comparable to the institutional profile of other B1G schools from both an athletic and academic standpoint. UAF, UAH, and UAA do not meet these requirements. The current focus is on expected addition of Illinois to the B1G in the near future (2021-22).

Having a seven team league is clearly not a major scheduling problem. The 2019-20 B1G season features 24 conference games.

I'd be very surprised if the new WCHA added UAH later after excluding them as charter members of the new conference. It's not going to happen. The only logical choice, other than retreating back to Independent status, would be the AHA (with the proximity of Robert Morris and Niagara) but it's doubtful the league is even interested in expanding, especially considering the geography and travel costs involved for member schools. It would also be a change from the WCHA as they will have to conform to the cost-containment model of 12 athletic scholarships instead of 18.

For the Alaska remnant, given the budget cuts in state funding, the downsizing of the UAA facility and an inevitable drop in competitive recruiting, it's doubtful UAA and UAF will receive an invite to any conference. But with the NHL expanding into the Las Vegas and Seattle markets, it's entirely possible an NCAA D1 west coast conference will emerge in the near future maybe out of the PAC-8 (currently under the ACHA) with teams like Stanford, UCLA, USC, Washington, ASU etc. That makes more fiscal sense for the Alaska teams.

Ah interesting. Thank you.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

For the Alaska remnant, given the budget cuts in state funding, the downsizing of the UAA facility and an inevitable drop in competitive recruiting, it's doubtful UAA and UAF will receive an invite to any conference. But with the NHL expanding into the Las Vegas and Seattle markets, it's entirely possible an NCAA D1 west coast conference will emerge in the near future maybe out of the PAC-8 (currently under the ACHA) with teams like Stanford, UCLA, USC, Washington, ASU etc. That makes more fiscal sense for the Alaska teams.

Not to be Debbie Downer but it is. We tried for many years to compete with Big 10 teams and didn't have a lot of success. Now the Pac 12 is gonna let us in because we are so much alike them? I don't know if we have a D1 hockey future however I have my doubts about that future being in a Pac 12 league.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Not to be Debbie Downer but it is. We tried for many years to compete with Big 10 teams and didn't have a lot of success. Now the Pac 12 is gonna let us in because we are so much alike them? I don't know if we have a D1 hockey future however I have my doubts about that future being in a Pac 12 league.

The Pacific 8 Intercollegiate Hockey Conference (PAC-8) is D2 club under the American Collegiate Hockey Association (ACHA). The PAC-8 was originally only open to schools from the PAC-12 but last season the league expanded to include affiliate members. In the same way as the Blackhawks have played a supporting role in the soon emergence of Illini hockey in the B1G, I suspect a West Coast NCAA D1 conference will emerge in the near future led by the NHL's expansion into western markets. In 2018-19 there were 49 players alone from California among the 60 teams in NCAA D1 hockey. With interest mounting, it won't be long before a true West Coast conference is a reality.

Some thoughts on potential teams for a West Coast NCAA D1 Men's hockey conference:

University of Alaska Anchorage - NCAA D1

University of Alaska Fairbanks - NCAA D1

Arizona State University - NCAA D1

University of Washington - Competes in the PAC-8, which includes California, Oregon, UCLA, USC and Washington State. Husky club hockey has been around for many years and is well known on the west coast. They always draw a significant fan base for regional matchups. With the NHL expansion into Seattle beginning with the 2021-22 season, there is no better location on the west coast to expand NCAA D1 men's hockey than Seattle, Washington.

Boise State University - Boise State's PAC-8 program is well developed and nationally competitive. They've won two PAC-8 championships and have a professional caliber arena in downtown Boise that would more than suffice for a D1 program. Sharing the Qwest Arena with the ECHL's Idaho Steelheads would further help build an already vibrant hockey culture in the small town of Boise, Idaho.

University of Nevada Las Vegas - Currently a ACHA D2 club, they've only lost three home games in two years. UNLV Rebels regularly play to a standing room-only City National Arena audience, which is the Vegas Golden Knights practice facility. They're currently working with the women’s lacrosse club as a way to also transition into NCAA status so as to ensure Title IX requirements are met, much like Arizona State did with lacrosse and women’s triathlon. In terms of facilities, infrastructure, fundraising and attendance, they may be in a better place than ASU was when they made the transition from club to D1 in 2015-16.

General Manager of the Rebels, Zee Khan estimates it would take $15-$20M to make the transition to D1 solvent for the first five years. Some significant financial generosity from the Engelstad Foundation and financial support from the Vegas Golden Knights has elevated their current budget to $500K. Add to that community fanbase efforts from area businesses such as medical professionals offering free services and clearly local fanbase support for the UNLV Rebels is strong enough to support a D1 team. I played in an exhibition against these guys back in the day and from what I remember they were fast, physical and well coached.

University of Oregon - Thanks to the backing from Nike's Phil Knight who has donated nearly $2 billion to U of O, his contributions have elevated the U of O athletics program and facilities to a level of excellence like few others. Oregon currently competes in the PAC-8 and won the PAC-8 championship last season. They have strong fanbase, so adding NCAA D1 men's and women's hockey to the mix would not be difficult. The new Matthew Knight Arena could easily be renovated to support college hockey. For the Ducks, hockey could easily become another massive revenue generator.

Stanford University - The Stanford University Cardinals is an academic elite much like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, etc. that has surprisingly successful athletics and could easily benefit from another revenue generating sport like NCAA D1 men's hockey. They currently play in the Pacific Collegiate Hockey Association (PCHA). Played in an exhibition against these guys too back in the day and they always seemed to field very fast teams.

University of California Los Angeles - Support from two NHL franchises and the youth hockey scene which has exploded from the presence of the Kings (Gretzky effect) and Ducks. Two NCAA D1 teams in the LA area would immediately incite a local rivalry between USC and UCLA. UCLA could easily share an arena with an NHL franchise or it could invest in an arena on campus.

University of Southern California - USC is a private institution known for the quality of it's athletics and academics, so conceivably both the financial support and recruiting possibilities for a D1 men's hockey program is a no-brainer. The Trojans have won eight PAC-8 hockey championships dating back to 1998, the most of any PAC-8 team. They could easily play out of the Staples Center or Honda Center, or could invest in a small arena on campus (perhaps near the current Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum).
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Great assessment. It would be great to see a strong PAC-8/10 DI conference in hockey. This would be the next logical step to expand the game and increase the market share for the game across the country. As more and more players are coming from the Left Coast, it would be nice if they could go to school closer to home.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

https://www.miningjournal.net/sports/2019/07/wcha-still-trying-to-figure-things-out-after/

When asked if he felt if Huntsville had a chance to become the eighth team to even out the new seven-team conference, Kurtz said that should be more of a national discussion.

“I think that’s a great question, but I think that’s a question that has to be addressed on a national level,” he said. “If college hockey wants all 60 schools to be viable, then a discussion has to take place on how to best make that happen for all 60 schools.”

Read: "That's someone else's problem, not ours. We know that there's no 'greater good of college hockey' anymore but will tug on those heartstrings while the Chargers are put down in the stable."

GFM
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Agreed. NMU was third in WCHA play, but missed the tournament...not because of the Alaska schools or Huntsville, but because they went 1-6 in non-con games. Our Pairwise problems are solved when we can go .500 against the NCHC and Big.

It's hard to go .500 in NCHC or other non-conference games when you're always playing on the road in their barns with their biased refs.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

https://www.miningjournal.net/sports/2019/07/wcha-still-trying-to-figure-things-out-after/

When asked if he felt if Huntsville had a chance to become the eighth team to even out the new seven-team conference, Kurtz said that should be more of a national discussion.

“I think that’s a great question, but I think that’s a question that has to be addressed on a national level,” he said. “If college hockey wants all 60 schools to be viable, then a discussion has to take place on how to best make that happen for all 60 schools.”

He could have just said, "I can't speak to that" or "It's too soon to tell." Ugh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top