What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

New WCHA is dead

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's cute how much you patrol the WCHA threads and think we care about your opinions. Begone, troll.

Good thing your opinion of me and what I do means zero

Sorry your school can no longer try and claim the high ground on the NCHC.
We tried explaining that this is a business not charity...you didn't listen.
I feel bad for the fans and players but this doesn't shock me at all.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

A reminder: SCSU was committed to stay in the WCHA with its other D2 "like minded schools" for four months after the NCHC breakup until the donors whined about taking donations away because they couldn't see NoDak come to town as often.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Good thing your opinion of me and what I do means zero

Sorry your school can no longer try and claim the high ground on the NCHC.
We tried explaining that this is a business not charity...you didn't listen.
I feel bad for the fans and players but this doesn't shock me at all.

<img src="https://media.tenor.com/images/c32f5649c3fd971207c73f0952aca336/tenor.png"></img>
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

A reminder: SCSU was committed to stay in the WCHA with its other D2 "like minded schools" for four months after the NCHC breakup until the donors whined about taking donations away because they couldn't see NoDak come to town as often.

And which of the 7 schools will have donors whine about taking donations because they won't see UA_ come to town as often?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

A reminder: SCSU was committed to stay in the WCHA with its other D2 "like minded schools" for four months after the NCHC breakup until the donors whined about taking donations away because they couldn't see NoDak come to town as often.
Do you have documentation to back this claim up? I ask because according to St. Cloud State's 2011-17 NCAA financial reports contributions to the hockey program have accounted for less than 2% of reported revenues for the sport. For those years the dollar amounts ranged from a low of $6,000 (0.2% of revenues) in 2013 to a high of $56,000 (1.9% of revenues) in 2014. In 2010 just over $241 thousand was donated, but that is an outlier, with the next best year coming in 2018 when just over $81 thousand (3.2% of revenue) was donated to hockey. And although donations rose $50,000 in the first season in the NCHC it was only 1.7% of hockey revenues for 2014. Furthermore, donations dropped the next two years before recovering some in 2017 before increasing 2.7 times in 2018. While donors may have whined, I seriously doubt that is the reason the school joined the NCHC. BTW, the average increase in annual donations of about $30,000 (I did not include the 2010 contributions in the calculation) is not even close to covering the average increase in annual travel costs of $103,000.

Speaking of St. Cloud State, does anyone happen to know why the school has reduced the amount of aid offered the past several years? While I was adding the information from St. Cloud State for 2017 & 2018 I noticed that for both those years the school only awarded 14.6 & 14.7 scholarships for the men and 13 & 13.8 for the women. They also only awarded 15.5 (men) & 13.9 (women) scholarships in 2016, while from 2010 through 2015 they had awarded between 16.8-17.9 scholarships for the men and 16.1-17.4 scholarships for the women.

Sean
 
Do you have documentation to back this claim up?

There was lots of virtual ink spent in columns written about how the locals reacted, but that era seems to have been erased from SCTimes.com thanks to Gannet Media; and isn't available through Google or Archive.org either.

Seems I have lost the receipts to this one.
 
Speaking of St. Cloud State, does anyone happen to know why the school has reduced the amount of aid offered the past several years? While I was adding the information from St. Cloud State for 2017 & 2018 I noticed that for both those years the school only awarded 14.6 & 14.7 scholarships for the men and 13 & 13.8 for the women. They also only awarded 15.5 (men) & 13.9 (women) scholarships in 2016, while from 2010 through 2015 they had awarded between 16.8-17.9 scholarships for the men and 16.1-17.4 scholarships for the women.

Sean

I can't speak directly for St Cloud, but it's entirely possible that the rest of the scholarships were covered in other ways. Need based awards, academic achievement awards, etc. Just because a student is awarded a full athletic scholarship doesn't mean they aren't encouraged to apply for other aid (scholarships and grants) first to reduce the financials of the team.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

I can't speak directly for St Cloud, but it's entirely possible that the rest of the scholarships were covered in other ways. Need based awards, academic achievement awards, etc. Just because a student is awarded a full athletic scholarship doesn't mean they aren't encouraged to apply for other aid (scholarships and grants) first to reduce the financials of the team.

UAA sometimes splits scholarships, almost the whole track team is on a half/half+ scholarship.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Do you have documentation to back this claim up? I ask because according to St. Cloud State's 2011-17 NCAA financial reports contributions to the hockey program have accounted for less than 2% of reported revenues for the sport. For those years the dollar amounts ranged from a low of $6,000 (0.2% of revenues) in 2013 to a high of $56,000 (1.9% of revenues) in 2014. In 2010 just over $241 thousand was donated, but that is an outlier, with the next best year coming in 2018 when just over $81 thousand (3.2% of revenue) was donated to hockey. And although donations rose $50,000 in the first season in the NCHC it was only 1.7% of hockey revenues for 2014. Furthermore, donations dropped the next two years before recovering some in 2017 before increasing 2.7 times in 2018. While donors may have whined, I seriously doubt that is the reason the school joined the NCHC. BTW, the average increase in annual donations of about $30,000 (I did not include the 2010 contributions in the calculation) is not even close to covering the average increase in annual travel costs of $103,000.

Maybe they were major donors to the school as a whole, not particularly the hockey team. Was there any change in unearmarked donations to the athletic department?
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

I can't speak directly for St Cloud, but it's entirely possible that the rest of the scholarships were covered in other ways. Need based awards, academic achievement awards, etc. Just because a student is awarded a full athletic scholarship doesn't mean they aren't encouraged to apply for other aid (scholarships and grants) first to reduce the financials of the team.

No doubt true, but most schools then give the unused partial to someone else. That's what makes St. Cloud's situation unusual. Unless the coach said, "Look, I could give another kid a partial, but he's never going to play for us anyway."
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

Maybe they were major donors to the school as a whole, not particularly the hockey team. Was there any change in unearmarked donations to the athletic department?
Yes, unmarked donations dropped by $60,000 the first year the team was in the NCHC, by another $25,000 the second year, and a further $16, 000 the third year before increasing by $94,000 the fourth year and increasing another $57,000 the fifth year. Again, donations to hockey did increase the first year in the NCHC by $50,000, but was offset by the loss of $60,000 to athletics in general.
Sean
 
No doubt true, but most schools then give the unused partial to someone else. That's what makes St. Cloud's situation unusual. Unless the coach said, "Look, I could give another kid a partial, but he's never going to play for us anyway."

I'm saying maybe the team as a whole had enough scholarships awarded, that they only needed 14.5 or whatever to cover everybody.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

One difference between the "new" WCHA and the NCHC:

WCHA: Well, we tried to make it work, it's not really working, AK schools are dying anyway (which sucks), UAH will get screwed again, but that's business.
NCHC: What? B1G gets their own conference? F that, we're making our own conference! Naw, we ain't gonna try and make the WCHA/CCHA continue. We're out.
SCSU: We don't even wanna be part of the NCHC. They didn't ask us, eff them. Wait, they're asking now? Ok, we're in.
 
One difference between the "new" WCHA and the NCHC:

WCHA: Well, we tried to make it work, it's not really working, AK schools are dying anyway (which sucks), UAH will get screwed again, but that's business.
NCHC: What? B1G gets their own conference? F that, we're making our own conference! Naw, we ain't gonna try and make the WCHA/CCHA continue. We're out.
SCSU: We don't even wanna be part of the NCHC. They didn't ask us, eff them. Wait, they're asking now? Ok, we're in.

And in every scenario...every school did or is doing what they thought was best for themselves.
So your differences are nothing but semantics.
 
Re: New WCHA is dead

And in every scenario...every school did or is doing what they thought was best for themselves.
So your differences are nothing but semantics.

The WCHA tried to make it work. The NCHC didn't even bother. They cut and ran. That's more than semantics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top