What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

NCAA Rankings 2/19/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/19/13

Didnt know where to put this so figured I'd throw it here.........Bobby Valentine new A.D. at Sacret Heart,yea the baseball manager the fun never ends:eek:..I think he is the one who is holding up the whole magilla
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Here are the 2/26/13 rankings as posted on 2/27/13 at about 5:30 PM

EAST
1. Norwich 17-2-1 22-2-1
2. Utica 20-5-1 20-5-1
3. Oswego St. 21-4-0 22-4-0
4. Bowdoin 20-3-2 20-3-2
5. Babson 12-4-5 15-6-5
6. Hobart 19-5-2 19-5-2
7. Neumann 17-6-3 18-6-3
8. Williams 15-5-3 16-6-3
9. Trinity (Conn.) 13-6-3 15-6-3
10. UMass-Boston 15-4-2 19-5-2
11. Plattsburgh State 18-6-1 19-6-1
12. Castleton 13-7-1 15-9-2
13. Manhattanville 15-9-3 15-9-3
14. Amherst 14-7-2 15-7-3
15. Plymouth State 16-6-1 18-6-1
16. Middlebury 13-10-2 13-10-2
WEST
1. Wisconsin-Eau Claire 20-4-1 20-4-2
2. St. Norbert 22-5-1 22-5-1
3. Adrian 19-1-3 21-1-3
4. Wisconsin-Stevens Point 15-11-1 15-11-11
5. Wisconsin-River Falls 13-11-1 13-11-1
6. MSOE 16-9-2 16-9-2
7. Gustavus Adolphus 16-7-2 17-7-3
8. Marian (Wis.) 13-11-1 13-11-1
 
Last edited:
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

UCBadger said:
Here are the 2/26/13 rankings as posted on 2/27/13 at about 5:30 PM

EAST
1. Norwich 17-2-1 22-2-1
2. Utica 20-5-1 20-5-1
3. Oswego St. 21-4-0 22-4-0
4. Bowdoin 20-3-2 20-3-2
5. Babson 12-4-5 15-6-5
6. Hobart 19-5-2 19-5-2
7. Neumann 17-6-3 18-6-3
8. Williams 15-5-3 16-6-3
9. Trinity (Conn.) 13-6-3 15-6-3
10. UMass-Boston 15-4-2 19-5-2
11. Plattsburgh State 18-6-1 19-6-1
12. Castleton 13-7-1 15-9-2
13. Manhattanville 15-9-3 15-9-3
14. Amherst 14-7-2 15-7-3
15. Plymouth State 16-6-1 18-6-1
16. Middlebury 13-10-2 13-10-2
WEST
1. Wisconsin-Eau Claire 20-4-1 20-4-2
2. St. Norbert 22-5-1 22-5-1
3. Adrian 19-1-3 21-1-3
4. Wisconsin-Stevens Point 15-11-1 15-11-11
5. Wisconsin-River Falls 13-11-1 13-11-1
6. MSOE 16-9-2 16-9-2
7. Gustavus Adolphus 16-7-2 17-7-3
8. Marian (Wis.) 13-11-1 13-11-1
Click to expand...

Nothing serious here. I Might have had Bowdoin at 3 and Oswego at 4. But Norwich and Utica 1/2 makes sense.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Hobart's loss last weekend really puts the Statesmen in a tough spot.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Pretty discouraging as a Plattsburgh fan (#11). No reason the Cards aren't ranked ahead of Williams (WIN,H2H,RNK), Trinity (WIN,SOS) or UM-Boston (SOS,RNK). That's to say nothing about Oswego (SOS, H2H X 2, RNK). There's got to be an explanation. I only care because I really think the Cards are advancing this weekend and it's very questionable how they could still be ranked so low. It probably means a play-in game if they're fortunate enough to get out of this weekend.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

admiral0417 said:
Pretty discouraging as a Plattsburgh fan (#11). No reason the Cards aren't ranked ahead of Williams (WIN,H2H,RNK), Trinity (WIN,SOS) or UM-Boston (SOS,RNK). That's to say nothing about Oswego (SOS, H2H X 2, RNK). There's got to be an explanation. I only care because I really think the Cards are advancing this weekend and it's very questionable how they could still be ranked so low. It probably means a play-in game if they're fortunate enough to get out of this weekend.
Click to expand...

Low SOS and not the best OOC record.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Ed Trefzger said:
Hobart's loss last weekend really puts the Statesmen in a tough spot.
Click to expand...

Yes. It's going to be an absolute cluster&*( for the final Pool C slot should Adrian and Norwich win. A Norwich loss makes things pretty simple I would think for Pool C. NCHA loser, Norwich and Utica.

But should Norwich and Adrian win....It looks like Oswego, Hobart, Neumann, Babson, Bowdoin all involved should Oswego and Bowdoin lose their conference tournaments.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/19/13

I agree 100%...there is no reason Plattsburgh should be so low. They are clearly (based off of results and SOS) one of the top 8 teams in the country. I also don't understand what Bowdoin has done to justify being ranked 4th in the country. Since their January 19th win against Middlebury, they have done nothing to justify their ranking.

Jan. 22 5 Southern Maine 1 W NC Box
Feb. 1 3 Amherst 6 L NS Box
Feb. 2 5 Hamilton 2 W NS Box
Feb. 10 3 @ Wesleyan 3 T/OT NS Box
Feb. 15 6 Tufts 1 W NS Box
Feb. 16 2 Conn. College 1 W/OT NS Box
Feb. 18 5 @ Trinity 10 L NS Box
Feb. 23 5 Hamilton 3 W NESCAC Tournament NS Box

They beat a weak USM team. They lost to Amherst who is done playing for the year. Beat a weak Hamilton team. Tie a middle of the back NESCAC team in Wesleyan...who is also done for the year. Beat a terrible Tufts team. Only beat Conn College because Conn needed to win to make playoffs and pulled their goalie in OT. Get smoked by Trinity. And barely squeak by a weak Hamilton team again. Their out of conference schedule has got to be one of the worst in D3 college hockey. The fact that they are ranked ahead of Plattsburgh, and ahead of Hobart, is mind boggling.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/19/13

Hobart behind Babson? Sorry I don't see it. Hobart has to hope for a M-ville win and a Norwich win to have a shot now.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

Re: NCAA Rankings 2/26/13

admiral0417 said:
Pretty discouraging as a Plattsburgh fan (#11). No reason the Cards aren't ranked ahead of Williams (WIN,H2H,RNK), Trinity (WIN,SOS) or UM-Boston (SOS,RNK). That's to say nothing about Oswego (SOS, H2H X 2, RNK). There's got to be an explanation. I only care because I really think the Cards are advancing this weekend and it's very questionable how they could still be ranked so low. It probably means a play-in game if they're fortunate enough to get out of this weekend.
Click to expand...
Williams - you might have a point, Trinity & UMass-B are toss-ups, and the answer to Oswego is 1) A significantly better winning %, and 2) A flawless record against all 15 common opponents vs. slight advantages on SOS and RNK. The fact that PSU wins the H2H battle is the result of a 2 goal difference, not some huge chasm between the relative strengths of the 2 teams.
IMHO teams #5 - #15 are separated by small differences, and their inclusion in the tourney will be accomplished by either winning out in their conference, or some subtle difference seen by the committee (and not me).
Could be what you are seeing is the result of a combined 5-4 record when playing outside the SUNYAC?
In the short number of years that I have been watching this process, this is the tightest field from 5-15 that I've seen.
 
Re: NCAA Rankings 2/19/13

NUProf said:
Plattsburgh's SOS is better than Oswego's. Osego is way too high and Plattsburgh is way too low. It makes no mathematical sense.
Click to expand...
But I will bow to Prof's math every time.

And not entirely due to the fact that I have his seats for the season :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top