Sol Diablo
Well-known member
Not all of it but much appears to be so.But remember that this is all speculation from a plaintiff’s attorney and the actual facts will come out soon!
![]()
Not all of it but much appears to be so.But remember that this is all speculation from a plaintiff’s attorney and the actual facts will come out soon!
![]()
The former Green Beret who led an Aug. 20 outdoor workout that left an Arizona State University hockey player in the hospital was reportedly not under contract with the university.
The Arizona Republic reported that Tim Zeisel’s attorney, Buddy Rake, said he only had a handshake agreement with head hockey coach Greg Powers and staff.
Arizona Republic reporter Robert Anglen told KTAR News 92.3 FM’s Outspoke with Bruce & Gaydos on Tuesday that agreement violates ASU’s Athletic Department guidelines.
“The policy says if the university is going to bring in somebody … from outside to work with athletes, they have to go through a vetting process and they have to sign what’s known as a consultant police form,” Anglen explained. “The trainer and his lawyer both say that never happened.”
That sounds definitive to me.
Based on the comments I saw on The Athletic’s Facebook page, he’s just another ASU fan defending the school with unwavering loyalty.Are you with the program / do you have inside knowledge? You speak like you have access to info / process we do not.
I am here on the ground in PHX and there isn't much of worth in the public space.
I get why ASU doesn't want to get rid of him, it's a risk of the unknown (UAA's downhill slide started when they got rid of Brush for example) and he brings a ton of donor money, but he's also a real liability.
Ordinarily in that situation, you'd kick Powers upstairs to keep working the phones and hire a head coach with proper NCAA experience. Problem solved.
However, from what I have heard over the years, Powers' relationship with the program's donors is cozier than most. If he gets ousted without their input, their donations could dry up. That's the risk you take when you allow the egos of big money donors to greatly influence and even outright make personnel decisions that should be made by an AD and administrators.