Did you guys actually watch the show or basing your reactions upon its reputation? It lasted 7 seasons, just like DS9 and TNG. I'm not blown away by what I've seen, but it mustn't have been so bad to last that long. I'll find out as I go along, though. Should the show get continuously bad, it's easy enough to dump from my watch list.
Also, I'm watching Glory right now. The final assault scene is about to begin. Such a good movie. Strong acting, good story, it makes for a true tribute to the Mass. 54th.
I just watched The Kingsmen...*** was that piece of crap? Here is an idea, how about instead of paying millions for an amazing cast you actually spend money on a script that doesnt blow goats. Seriously, I would have walked out if I saw it in theaters.
Meh, I was tired, Trek vs. Wars was just a matter of the fingers being on autopilot. As to the Voyager/Voyageur, listening to yet another Brit accent on the show probably had me thinking of people who spell things the wrong way.You called it STAR WARS VOYAGEUR...that is how you failed. (its Star Trek and it is spelled Voyager)
Meh, I was tired, Trek vs. Wars was just a matter of the fingers being on autopilot. As to the Voyager/Voyageur, listening to yet another Brit accent on the show probably had me thinking of people who spell things the wrong way.
You're doing it wrong. I had my doubts going in. And I was pleasantly surprised. It was just over the top fun. As I mentioned earlier, it was redonkulous fun.
I wasnt expecting much, and I got even less. It was stupid and not in the good way. Glad you enjoyed it but I want my two hours back.
What's the backstory behind these two coming to blows and how/when/where does it fit with the Justice League?
I was expecting a disjointed "ooo super neat comic book action move" and a story that only a comic book geek could love. While the former was true (and I admit, it was awesome), the latter I was wrong on.
Meh, I was tired, Trek vs. Wars was just a matter of the fingers being on autopilot. As to the Voyager/Voyageur, listening to yet another Brit accent on the show probably had me thinking of people who spell things the wrong way.
I was just giving you crapAnd they spend time exploring the Quadrant because they are looking to form alliances and find faster routes home. They have 80 years to kill
How far in are you?
I am a comic book geek, I hated every second of that movie. There ws plenty that could have worked but they never fleshed out any of the storylines. It was like 15 different small bios put together with with bunch of people dying in cartoony ways. I would rather watch Looney Tunes or the Muppets.
No. Going dark places isn't the same as grimdark. Grimdark is in reference to the over reliance on dark and gritty imagery and story to the exclusion of everything else. It's being dark and oppressive just because without any levity or room to breath. It's a misguided attempt to make superheroes more 'adult'."Grimdark" is one of the lamest and laziest criticisms to date and I see it everywhere for stuff. A world where Batman exists is going to be dark otherwise there is no point to it. (this isnt the 1960s) Same holds true for Daredevil and people seem to love that show despite its "grimdarkness". Grimdark is turning into the new "derivative" or "Jump the Shark" where people just say it cause they dont like something. (not attacking you foxton just an observation)
Kind of like "Kick-Ass"?![]()
No. Going dark places isn't the same as grimdark. Grimdark is in reference to the over reliance on dark and gritty imagery and story to the exclusion of everything else. It's being dark and oppressive just because without any levity or room to breath. It's a misguided attempt to make superheroes more 'adult'.
As for Batman, he may exist in a dark world, it doesn't define everything else around him, and certainly shouldn't be his only attribute. But it's become expected since he dominates everything even though two of the three superheroes do not live in some depressing perpetual night. Also, screw the idea that everything that ever deals with Batman has to be like Nolan, Burton, or Miller's stuff. Especially the latter two. Batman isn't about just beating up bad guys and growling about justice from the shadows while he goes to the same extremes as the psychotics he fights. Frank Miller and the cult of batman that grew from his work is the worst thing that ever happened to the character and comics in general.
Marvel movies by comparison to DC has mostly figured out how to create a balance of dark/serious without needing a grimdark atmosphere