What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

The point is, Bakunin was all brenthurt about tUMD fans flooding this thread with talk of our recent success, and I've done nothing of the sort. Talking about my underwear = just part of the trolling, yes. You're just being deliberately obtuse now. Again, JDubbs is receiving nothing that he isn't asking for with his behavior. He mentioned me in this thread before I was even in it. And is obsessed with using my real name, which is creepy.

To recap:
JDubbs = boiling a bunny
Me = trolling
Tiggsy = desperately in need of a mood elevator

Go fix me a turkey pot pie.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

The point is, Bakunin was all brenthurt about tUMD fans flooding this thread with talk of our recent success, and I've done nothing of the sort. Talking about my underwear = just part of the trolling, yes. You're just being deliberately obtuse now. Again, JDubbs is receiving nothing that he isn't asking for with his behavior. He mentioned me in this thread before I was even in it. And is obsessed with using my real name, which is creepy.

To recap:
JDubbs = boiling a bunny
Me = trolling
Tiggsy = desperately in need of a mood elevator

So you admit I'm right. Well that's nice. I don't recall ever saying what you were flooding our thread with... which I think is probably the 3rd or 4th series thread in a row now that you've flooded for no other reason that trolling. How that's being obtuse you'll have to clue me in.

Double teamed by Dirty and RWD? Wow, don't I feel special.

Dirty, I'm not whining. I'm simply calling you on your obviously loose definition of "facts". They seem to be pesky things that are getting in the way of your view. Maybe someday you'll join the rest of us in the real world, but I won't be holding my breath.

Edit: Add the fact you didn't seem to pick up on the meaning of :rolleyes:. Yes fact, otherwise you likely would have picked up on the smiley which indicates sarcasm in context.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Well if you're not going to go look at the Des Moines Register, why did you even ask for a citation?
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Well if you're not going to go look at the Des Moines Register, why did you even ask for a citation?

Just for kicks, I actually did. Their online records only go back to 2002. So how did you pull a cite from 1980 out of your arse that is not fabricated.

EDIT: why I wasted my time actually doing so is a mystery. Maybe a combination from killing time at work and a desire to prove you wrong with another fact.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

So you admit I'm right. Well that's nice. I don't recall ever saying what you were flooding our thread with... which I think is probably the 3rd or 4th series thread in a row now that you've flooded for no other reason that trolling. How that's being obtuse you'll have to clue me in.

Double teamed by Dirty and RWD? Wow, don't I feel special.

Dirty, I'm not whining. I'm simply calling you on your obviously loose definition of "facts". They seem to be pesky things that are getting in the way of your view. Maybe someday you'll join the rest of us in the real world, but I won't be holding my breath.

Ok, let me explain. Commie was all brenthurt about tUMD fans bragging in the thread. I pointed out that I wasn't bragging, but rather being off topic, and gave an example of being off-topic. You argued that the topic I was using to de-rail the thread was not the main topic I was using to derail the thread. I mean, is that even important? Yes, I am off-topic. Does it matter whether more posts were about my panties or more posts were about JDubbs being a freaking creepy stalker? No, it doesn't. Try harder here. You are trying to call me out because I said "Most of my posts are about my panties" as a way of illustrating that I haven't come into this sad little thread and boasted about tUMD hockey ad nauseum, which was what Commie was whining about. Come on, man.

If it wasn't for Dirty and me, this thread would be like a page long. The rivalry really is dead.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Just for kicks, I actually did. Their online records only go back to 2002. So how did you pull a cite from 1980 out of your arse that is not fabricated.

EDIT: why I wasted my time actually doing so is a mystery. Maybe a combination from killing time at work and a desire to prove you wrong with another fact.

I have a photographic memory.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Ok, let me explain. Commie was all brenthurt about tUMD fans bragging in the thread. I pointed out that I wasn't bragging, but rather being off topic, and gave an example of being off-topic. You argued that the topic I was using to de-rail the thread was not the main topic I was using to derail the thread. I mean, is that even important? Yes, I am off-topic. Does it matter whether more posts were about my panties or more posts were about JDubbs being a freaking creepy stalker? No, it doesn't. Try harder here. You are trying to call me out because I said "Most of my posts are about my panties" as a way of illustrating that I haven't come into this sad little thread and boasted about tUMD hockey ad nauseum, which was what Commie was whining about. Come on, man.

If it wasn't for Dirty and me, this thread would be like a page long. The rivalry really is dead.

Again, I hear that I was right and you trying to down play the fact I was right. It doesn't matter if you don't think it was important. It's still what I said. I don't want to try any harder because I'm not sure you're worth the effort. :p
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I'm incapable of being "Brenthurt" - whatever that means.

My series of responses is geared toward dropsoap or droppass or dropacid and others like him/her - people who come into the thread, ask us to keep talking about how much our teams suck, and who prominently display the same boring signature of "2011 national champions" or something similar - just in case we forgot who won the title last April.

Oh, and you'd probably make Wes vomit if you said you've decided to forego the panties and go commando from now on.

Sorry that I hurt your feelings. I am glad that historically your team is the greatest of all time, it should give you comfort while your team continues to under-perform. I now understand why both UMTC and UND fans are so pessimistic about this series. That much prior success would scare anyone.

I changed my sig to something less offensive. Thanks for the help.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Again, I hear that I was right and you trying to down play the fact I was right. It doesn't matter if you don't think it was important. It's still what I said. I don't want to try any harder because I'm not sure you're worth the effort. :p

This is so sad, needing approval and validation from the internets. Don't you have someone in your life who loves you? Maybe you can pay a nice lady/gent to treat you well for an hour or so?
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Two is a party three is a flood?


You heard it here folks! Two ties on the weekend! I am calling it!
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

If it wasn't for Dirty and me, this thread would be like a page long. The rivalry really is dead.

I think you underestimate the "old as f2ck" posters who write 5 paragraph manifests that no one reads.......also, occasionally Rinkpig stops by for his welfare check. In any case you need to realize you are arguing with mostly middle to late age men who drank themselves out of a job or two, masturbate to squirter porn, and have more hair on their backs than their heads.

Sioux Sweep.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I think you underestimate the "old as f2ck" posters who write 5 paragraph manifests that no one reads.......also, occasionally Rinkpig stops by for his welfare check. In any case you need to realize you are arguing with mostly middle to late age men who drank themselves out of a job or two, masturbate to squirter porn, and have more hair on their backs than their heads.

Sioux Sweep.

Calmer than you are dude.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

In any case you need to realize you are arguing with mostly middle to late age men who drank themselves out of a job or two, masturbate to squirter porn, and have more hair on their backs than their heads.

Sioux Sweep.

Hey! We're not all like you, wetwillykid and Goon!
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

This sandbagging by Gopher fans is amusing. UND doesn't have enough healthy skaters to field a full lineup. Connor Gaarder is the best freshman so far and he's a walk-on. UND will be lucky to split as by the third period each night they will be dead tired and the Gophers will be able to dominate play.

coming from the guy that implied i didnt even think they should play the games because i predicted the gophers would do well. speaking of not posting anymore.. can you stop? 53000 posts. 11 posts a day since you registered in 1999. about one post every hour and a half that youve been awake in those 13 years. and youre NOT getting paid for this.

oh thats right. you live in north dakota.
 
Back
Top