What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Bakunin said:
Are shorter than they appear?

And for the time being, MN is still in first place (thanks, tiebreaker!). :p
Click to expand...

"no longer matter" He is obviously referring to how UMD is now irrelevant to UMN since UMN is ahead of the Dogs and done playing them for this regular season. :D

ETA: and BTW, it's a low blow to talk about another Poster's significant other on here. ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Runninwiththedogs said:
Listen, I know you're all Brenthurt and everything, but you do know I haven't said anything about our title OR our unbeaten streak in this thread, right? I've mostly talked about MY PANTIES. (Just for Wes!)
Click to expand...

Once again I'm calling you on that because it's not true. Mentioned, I guess but definitely not mostly talked about. Look again and you will see typical name calling and trolling Jdubbs that has nothing to do with your apparently new favorite topic. Start a new thread and feel free to talk all you want about them there.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

I'm sure I'm behind the curve here (as usual) but I saw someone call them the "Fighting Whoix" which I thought was pretty clever.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

This series is vital for the Goofs if they want to add more hardware on top of the Virg.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

goldy_331 said:
I'm sure I'm behind the curve here (as usual) but I saw someone call them the "Fighting Whoix" which I thought was pretty clever.
Click to expand...

You're only roughly 30 years behind. That's better than usual, isn't it?
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
You're only roughly 30 years behind. That's better than usual, isn't it?
Click to expand...

Yeah. So 30 years ago you guys considered using the name Fighting Whoix? Then why did it take you so dam long to realize the NCAA wasn't "just kidding" when they said you had to drop the Sioux name? :confused:
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

goldy_331 said:
Yeah. So 30 years ago you guys considered using the name Fighting Whoix? Then why did it take you so dam long to realize the NCAA wasn't "just kidding" when they said you had to drop the Sioux name? :confused:
Click to expand...

No, 30 years ago was the first time someone called them the Fighting Whoix. Or Sue. Or Blue. Or Blew. Or Gooix.

It's no wonder you're behind the times, you don't understand simple answers.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

How about the Fighting Pioux... is that nioux?
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
No, 30 years ago was the first time someone called them the Fighting Whoix. Or Sue. Or Blue. Or Blew. Or Gooix.

It's no wonder you're behind the times, you don't understand simple answers.
Click to expand...

We're not immersed in the whole situation like you are. Plus we don't care all that much. Add that to the fact that you don't make too much sense most of the time. Add that all together and it's quite understandable why someone wouldn't quite pick up your vague innuendo on the first try.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Tiggsy said:
We're not immersed in the whole situation like you are. Plus we don't care all that much. Add that to the fact that you don't make too much sense most of the time. Add that all together and it's quite understandable why someone wouldn't quite pick up your vague innuendo on the first try.
Click to expand...

How is it vague innuendo when I directly replied to him? He thought he was behind the curve and I confirmed that he was about 30 years behind. Just because you aren't bright enough to follow along does not change these facts.

jerryj said:
why even go into pre-series threads for discussion if you cant make a prediction?
Click to expand...

Agreed. You shouldn't be posting.
 
Last edited:
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
No, 30 years ago was the first time someone called them the Fighting Whoix. Or Sue. Or Blue. Or Blew. Or Gooix.
Click to expand...

So 30 years ago where they publishing it in the newspapers? Do you have a citation of where? I'd like to give proper attribution to the originator of this great nickname.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
How is it vague innuendo when I directly replied to him? He thought he was behind the curve and I confirmed that he was about 30 years behind. Just because you aren't bright enough to follow along does not change these facts.
Click to expand...

I can follow along with facts, but it looks like you may be confused on what facts really are. If they really are facts, goldy is right. Cite them please.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

goldy_331 said:
So 30 years ago where they publishing it in the newspapers? Do you have a citation of where? I'd like to give proper attribution to the originator of this great nickname.
Click to expand...

Jones, Melvin. "North Dakota Awesomeness." Des Moines Register. 16 December 1980, 1st Edition: C3.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
Jones, Melvin. "North Dakota Awesomeness." Des Moines Register. 16 December 1980, 1st Edition: C3.
Click to expand...

Wow, how could anyone dispute that obviously well researched and not made up citation? :rolleyes:
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Tiggsy said:
Once again I'm calling you on that because it's not true. Mentioned, I guess but definitely not mostly talked about. Look again and you will see typical name calling and trolling Jdubbs that has nothing to do with your apparently new favorite topic. Start a new thread and feel free to talk all you want about them there.
Click to expand...

The point is, Bakunin was all brenthurt about tUMD fans flooding this thread with talk of our recent success, and I've done nothing of the sort. Talking about my underwear = just part of the trolling, yes. You're just being deliberately obtuse now. Again, JDubbs is receiving nothing that he isn't asking for with his behavior. He mentioned me in this thread before I was even in it. And is obsessed with using my real name, which is creepy.

To recap:
JDubbs = boiling a bunny
Me = trolling
Tiggsy = desperately in need of a mood elevator
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Dirty said:
Jones, Melvin. "North Dakota Awesomeness." Des Moines Register. 16 December 1980, 1st Edition: C3.
Click to expand...

That must be the Melvin who is busy being the resident UND troll over on GPL. I'll ask him about it, thanks.
 
Re: MN @ UND: tArrogance vs ___________

Tiggsy said:
Wow, how could anyone dispute that obviously well researched and not made up citation? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You can obviously. You whine because you don't understand something. Then you whine because something isn't cited. Then you whine when it is cited. You just like to whine I think.
 
Runninwiththedogs said:
The point is, Bakunin was all brenthurt about tUMD fans flooding this thread with talk of our recent success, and I've done nothing of the sort. Talking about my underwear = just part of the trolling, yes. You're just being deliberately obtuse now. Again, JDubbs is receiving nothing that he isn't asking for with his behavior. He mentioned me in this thread before I was even in it. And is obsessed with using my real name, which is creepy.

To recap:
JDubbs = boiling a bunny
Me = trolling
Tiggsy = desperately in need of a mood elevator
Click to expand...

<IMG SRC="http://www.ihavescleroderma.com/images/donna.jpg"></>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top