The only thing I could ever figure out was that since that was the climactic play of that game, and that's why Buckner's failure would get more play than Stanley's, Schiraldi's or anyone else who made a mistake in that game. But even with that being the climactic moment of that game, the Sox still had to blow a 3-0 lead in the next one, without Buckner's help and he still was the goat. In fact in his first opportunity at redemption 2 nights later he laces a 2-out single and is promptly stranded at first. Always a completely unfair vilification. Hell, the complete lack of a climactic aspect of the Bartman game in 2003 makes the Cubs complaining even more of a mystery to me.