The_Commissioner
New member
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.
If there is any truth to this rumor, what more proof do the skeptics need that the AD is in over her head when it comes to resurrecting a failed D1 program? No, it is not a "great idea" unless the AD actually intends to erode her authority (and power) by delegating the initial negotiation part of the "most important hire in my career" to unnamed, unnaccoutable alums. It's a terrible idea and anyone who suggests otherwise has no insight into executive management.
It's admirable of her to consult with alums until they become her personal representatives and give candidates the impression the AD's hiring decision is nothing more than rubber stamping the recommendation of the alums. If she has to rely on the hockey-knowledgeable alums to do the heavy lifting, then we don't have the right management for a D1 program.
Just a small change =P
But, I got on here for a possible rumor, I figure what the hell, everything's been thrown out there already.
Through the grapevine, I've heard that the AD has been contacting specific alumni and AD contributors, to basically say, "Who do you want? Ok, you contact them, let us know what they want in return." This way, a potential coach gets a call from an alumni...instead of the AD department directly, they can basically say, "We're a committee in charge of finding a new coach, what would it take for you to come to Tech?"
Now this is all rumor, the general idea I'm sure has been done many times, also, who these specific alumni and contributors are is all in question but...meh, and it is all dependent on what the AD is willing to shellout, but I figure I'll make a contribution.
Great idea for her to do it this way. Opens the door for a bigger variety and also gets these alumni invested in the program again, plus up's the donations.
If there is any truth to this rumor, what more proof do the skeptics need that the AD is in over her head when it comes to resurrecting a failed D1 program? No, it is not a "great idea" unless the AD actually intends to erode her authority (and power) by delegating the initial negotiation part of the "most important hire in my career" to unnamed, unnaccoutable alums. It's a terrible idea and anyone who suggests otherwise has no insight into executive management.
It's admirable of her to consult with alums until they become her personal representatives and give candidates the impression the AD's hiring decision is nothing more than rubber stamping the recommendation of the alums. If she has to rely on the hockey-knowledgeable alums to do the heavy lifting, then we don't have the right management for a D1 program.