What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

That is what needs to be infused into the culture at MTU.
Even without equal talent, the compete level can make a huge difference.

Tech showed this in the last game against UND, but did not display it consistently over the course of the 38 game season.

The guys in the WMU jerseys are well coached.

No teams do it consistently over 38 games; tech out worked teams quite often during Russells tenure and often ended up with L's because of the lack of talent.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Russell reflects on walking away
HOUGHTON - Jamie Russell didn't look like a man who had just given up his job as he cleaned out his office on Thursday.

The now former head coach at Michigan Tech - he resigned Wednesday - was his usual calm and reserved self. He even had a smile on his face despite all the tumult he has endured over the past several months.

And that smile says a lot about the man. Because he had to be hurting after giving up the top job at his alma mater.

The Russell era did have a couple of good years. The Huskies won a combined 32 games in 2006-07 and 2007-08 and made the 2007 WCHA Final Five.

But those two good seasons weren't nearly enough. And the past three years things have gotten significantly worse.

So Russell is leaving the post he holds close behind. And he seems to have come to terms with his decision.

"The best memories are of the players and the guys I've worked with, that's what I'll remember," Russell said. "Successes, obviously, there weren't enough of them.

"We had a big rebuilding job to do when I took over. We got things going and made the Final Five. Some of the kids that we recruited (Casey Pierro-Zabotel and Jake Hauswirth) but didn't land here hurt.

"Who knows what kind of college players they would have been, but I think they turned pro too early. Over the last three years we've had a lot of injuries to deal with, but the players did a great job handling the adversity."

The players that Russell is leaving behind are now in need of a new coach. And the search for him has already been set in motion.

"The national search will begin immediately, there's already been a few phone calls," Tech Athletic Director Suzanne Sanregret said. "We will officially post it (the coaching position) on Monday.

"We will conduct the search very thoroughly. Of course we want to get someone in here as soon as possible, but we will take our time to make sure we get the right person, so that we can ensure the future success of the program."

But will the school be willing to put up the money needed to bring in a big-name coach. According to Sanregret, finances should not be an issue.

"I'm very fortunate (Tech President) Glenn Mroz understands the big picture of things and he's given me the authority to use resources to go after the best coach," Sanregret said. "We're also fortunate that we have many alums who understand that as well, so the commitment is there as well as the resources."
http://www.mininggazette.com/page/content.detail/id/519491/Russell-reflects-on-walking-away.html?nav=5009
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

maybe we should spend the money on more facilities improvements which would help to lure more top talent?

Just a thought,
Ryan J

And what kind of improvements would you propose to the facilities?
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

We've already spent a boatload behind the scenes. I toured pretty much everything back there once (everyone who's been to a "Meet the Coaches" event has), and it's safe to say that facilities aren't the problem. It's the obvious stuff that SG already pointed out - Houghton and Tech are a tough sell to most recruits, even with the lure of competing for Top 6 minutes right away.

And I disagree that the team has lacked talent. I think recruiting came a long way as Russell's tenure wore on, he and his staff just never found a way to keep the team healthy.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

No teams do it consistently over 38 games; tech out worked teams quite often during Russells tenure and often ended up with L's because of the lack of talent.

No, the prototypical game was a 4-2 loss in which Tech would compete for one period and then fold. Good teams do not do allow this to happen to them on a consistent basis.
The recruiting has gotten better only the past couple years. Ryan Furne is the kind of player you want your team filled with. The majority of Tech recruits score 6 points all year and don't match most teams freshman first year totals in all four years at Tech. I really liked Jamie Russell and hoped he would have been the coach for many years, but it is time to bring in someone that can get the talent to be competitive in the WCHA. Otherwise, regroup, switch leagues and at least be respectable.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

No, the prototypical game was a 4-2 loss in which Tech would compete for one period and then fold. .

Which is exactly what happens in most cases when the talent gap is large between two teams; the skill takes over. You actually believe the players were giving up? You don't give them much credit do you.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Which is exactly what happens in most cases when the talent gap is large between two teams; the skill takes over. You actually believe the players were giving up? You don't give them much credit do you.
I often wonder about the percentage of truly discerning hockey fans that post here. Maybe 25%? You have found one of the 75% majority if that's the case.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

I often wonder about the percentage of truly discerning hockey fans that post here. Maybe 25%? You have found one of the 75% majority if that's the case.

Completely unrelated, every thought about making your blogspot site a TLD (top-level domain)? i.e. http://www.uaahockey.com or something similar?

If you don't want to hijack this thread shoot me an e-mail --- stouthockey (at) gmail (dot) com
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

It appears to me that the step from Assistant to Head coach is a bigger step than from D3 to D1. The recruiting, the administrative BS, the alumni back slapping on top of the pressure of winning is very tough. The "up and coming assistant" approach just hasn't worked for us.

A successful D3 coach would be coming to a larger arena, a tougher conference and a bigger paycheck and therefore consider it a promotion. He might also have something to prove since people look down their noses at D3, never mind that St. Norbert could beat Tech on most nights. A D1 assistant would be coming to a smaller arena, a similar paycheck and may view it as a step sideways or a stepping stone. Either one will have to be willing to step into the breach and embrace the challenge of overcoming 30 years of bad hockey. I think we'll be pleasantly surprised at the list of qualified candidates interested in this position...

The problem I see with bringing a coach up from D-III is the recruiting end. He is not likely to have the network to recruit D-I talent. Now, someone who has been a successful D-III coach and is now a D-I assistant at a good program is definitely a viable candidate. As far as shelling out big bucks for a D-I coach with a record of success, if he is currently employed, is Tech going to not only offer him the money, but the assistant salaries, travel and recruiting budget that it would take for him to move the Tech program ahead of his current employer. If Tech and Michigan State are interested in the same candidate, what are Tech's chances? Remember the resources that State has beyond the coach's salary. State travels to NMU, they fly. Can MTU offer flights to Grand Forks, Omaha, Minnesota, St. Cloud and Mankato? To compete for that level of coach, take the salary he desires and add about another $150,000 a year for travel, recruiting and assistant salaries above what is already there. At that point, you're only giving him what he already has. You make it a lateral move. You have to go above and beyond what he already has. That's the way you can attract the marquee type names.
 
Last edited:
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

love is blind. Did you watch UND @ MTU? Talent has been in awfully short supply.

Not really a fair comparison in this day and age. It's likely that the two programs will never again have comparable levels of talent like they did in the 60s. However, you can't deny that if we'd had Baker, 100% healthy seasons out of Olson, Royer, and Gordic, and if Kattelus hadn't been a selfish crook, this team would've had better depth throughout the season, been less reliant on freshmen forwards, and had a much better shot at winning some games. I'm definitely not saying that they would've had a winning record, but I think we would've seen more wins and fewer blowouts.

If you go back and look at Russell's first 2-3 recruiting classes, compared to the classes since about 2007 or so, you can see the improvement in terms of average talent level.

It doesn't matter though, since none of that happened, and thus it was time for a new direction.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Not really a fair comparison in this day and age. It's likely that the two programs will never again have comparable levels of talent like they did in the 60s. However, you can't deny that if we'd had Baker, 100% healthy seasons out of Olson, Royer, and Gordic, and if Kattelus hadn't been a selfish crook, this team would've had better depth throughout the season, been less reliant on freshmen forwards, and had a much better shot at winning some games. I'm definitely not saying that they would've had a winning record, but I think we would've seen more wins and fewer blowouts.

all true, and all part of the reasons why it's true that we did lack the talent necessary to compete this year.
But here's the biggest knock on Russell, and one of the reasons I never wrote a letter in support of keeping him around: he didn't believe he could get top talent to come here, and according to many reports didn't even try in certain cases where it was available to him. (He once said in an interview, "we're not going to get that type of player to come here," in reference to blue chip NHL prospects)This lack of faith in what Tech could be beyond mostly a bunch of blue collar grinders playing 'dump and drop' was aggravating. I admit I'm a clueless optimist, but I don't see a reason to concede that we'll never be as good as UND in future. I want a coach that believes we can win a national title.

edit: that sounds too harsh. I do love our freshmen, and I think the team is heading in the right direction talent-wise.
 
Last edited:
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

I don't care where the guy comes from as long as he is someone that can motivate players like few can. A Mike Krzyzewski type. After that we can get the rest of the pieces put together fairly easily. These type guys really do get a lot more from their players than everyone else, but they do not grow on trees. Kids will go anywhere to play for a top coach like this, they will beat a path to your door.

To answer the question on Hakstol. No, imho he is not that great, but the program behind him is and so they win.
Tech can be a top program, but only if we have a staff that is highly respected by hockey people all over.
Certainly we need more than just a coach but if he comes he will ask for things.
.

Also, You have to understand the difference between the top WCHA teams and the bottom is not that far. A Frattin, a Zucker, and a couple of good defensemen.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Sorry for the double post. I am hopeful the travel issues someone referred to will be solved pretty soon.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

I don't care where the guy comes from as long as he is someone that can motivate players like few can.

I agree, this is why I've endorsed hiring Brad Aldrich as an assistant when there's been an opening. He has an incredibly dynamic personality (think Jamie Russell on charliesheen). He coached midgets while in college, then went to Notre Dame and they came near a national title (2006/07), went to the Blackhawks and they won the Stanley Cup, went to Vancouver with the Olympic team and won silver... always an assistant/operations guy, but a very highly respected one for a kid in his 20's. I think he could recruit very successfully.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

I agree, this is why I've endorsed hiring Brad Aldrich as an assistant when there's been an opening. He has an incredibly dynamic personality (think Jamie Russell on charliesheen). He coached midgets while in college, then went to Notre Dame and they came near a national title (2006/07), went to the Blackhawks and they won the Stanley Cup, went to Vancouver with the Olympic team and won silver... always an assistant/operations guy, but a very highly respected one for a kid in his 20's. I think he could recruit very successfully.

He wasn't a coach at Notre Dame or Chicago. He was the video guy. And why is he not still in Chicago?
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

I think whoever is head coach will have his choice of assistants.I don't think it is a separate hire.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

He wasn't a coach at Notre Dame or Chicago. He was the video guy. And why is he not still in Chicago?
lolz. can you imagine Tech hiring away an NHL coach? yeah, me neither. When did he quit the Hawks?
I think whoever is head coach will have his choice of assistants.I don't think it is a separate hire.
no doubt about that.
 
Re: Michigan Tech Offseason Thread I: Not Winning and the ensuing drama.

Also, You have to understand the difference between the top WCHA teams and the bottom is not that far. A Frattin, a Zucker, and a couple of good defensemen.

This might be one of the dumbest things I've ever read on here. One can only hope that the athletic leadership doesn't subscribe to this level of stupidity, because if they do, Michigan Tech will be in the basement of the WCHA forever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top