I agree 100% on Hastings. Near 20 years coaching experience, most winning coach in USHL history, never a season below .500 winning percentage, GM of the year several times. One year under Lucia, two years under Dean Blais and a couple years early on in St. Cloud. Rud, I'm not so sure he is proven enough to be in Hastings class and be considered a quality candidate for MTU at this point. 7 years total experience, 1 as a head coach. He has been fairly successful in his career.
Regarding recruiting, I would give Hastings the nod there as well with his close ties to the USHL. I also think Hastings would do a better job of marketing MTU than Rud based on their public speaking skills. I do not know if Rud will be enough to convince a Ben Johnson to turn down Michigan; with Hastings I think he comes to Tech.
I am not saying that Rud, if hired, couldn't turn out to be a great coach; I just don't believe he has a long enough track record. Not as a personal dig at Rud in any respect, but just based on his lack of experience, I think that if hired the first reaction by the hockey world will be "I thought resources weren't an issue". If Dean Blais was pursued, the money is available so how does Eric Rud become the final candidate.
Apparently, Tech doesn't feel it is worth putting down the money for a Hastings (based on my opinion that Hastings has likely turned down MTU if Rud is interviewing) or Pearson to ultimately turn their "no thanks" into "when do I start". I don't really understand that because I realize they stated pay is comm. on experience but they should have also known going into this that they are going to have to pay more at this point than a program in good standing would have to pay (ask the Edmonton Oilers about attracting big name free agents- they have to pay alot more than the wings). So in four years at $150-$175, if taking the bargain coach puts Tech back into the same position they are now, wouldn't over paying maybe 50-75K per year be worth it to get the candidate you want. I think it's a big risk to not get the best possible candidate now even if it's considered overpaying for the candidate. If the program turns around, it will be a good investment and pay for itself; if not she can't be faulted for trying. If I was Mrs. Sanregret, I would not be comfortable taking this risk.