What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

haha. Look, I know I've won the honor of douch*ebag poster of the month, I accept that. But you know, someone had to pick up Hokydads slack ;)

It's pretty hard to attain the tone of annoyance and *******bagge*ry Hokydad gives off, sorry to disappoint you, but you're not even close. Things have been so much quieter since that idiots been gone.
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

It's pretty hard to attain the tone of annoyance and *******bagge*ry Hokydad gives off, sorry to disappoint you, but you're not even close. Things have been so much quieter since that idiots been gone.

Are you challenging me to amp it up? ;) just kidding. I think I've taken my chill pill for the most part. I'm back to 'generally hard to please' and no longer 'livid about a big win' ;) :) :)
 
Last edited:
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

The forgotten man Sirman should get the start this weekend.................

Go Blue !!

Sirman has a .919% to Sully's .883 - and Shawn has played vs. BC, vs North Dakota and @ an amped up MSU crowd (home opener)...

Am I still the only believer in this kid?
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

CBS college sports is showing a replay of the Maine-BC game right now. It just started for anyone that's interested
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

Sirman has a .919% to Sully's .883 - and Shawn has played vs. BC, vs North Dakota and @ an amped up MSU crowd (home opener)...

Am I still the only believer in this kid?
After seeing Sirman the other night, I'm confused as to why he isn't in there at least every other game.
Have only seen Sirman once and Sully 3 times (1@BU and 2 @ BC), and I'm not sold on Sully... he fills a lot of net, but is not real quick on his feet.
Sirman looked pretty darn good to me, especially on the penalty shot. Good skater, good glove, quick on his feet. Maybe he just had the game of his life on Sunday?
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

CBS college sports is showing a replay of the Maine-BC game right now. It just started for anyone that's interested

I have cable and can't find that channel. Maybe it's part of a special package that I don't have? If you have cable too, what number is that channel?
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

I have cable and can't find that channel. Maybe it's part of a special package that I don't have? If you have cable too, what number is that channel?

I don't think its on basic cable. I live in a dorm on campus and its channel 26 here but I don't know about anywhere else. I think its a triple digit # of some sort but not sure.
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

I have cable and can't find that channel. Maybe it's part of a special package that I don't have? If you have cable too, what number is that channel?

With Time Warner it's 175, and then one of the low 730's in HD.
 
With Time Warner it's 175, and then one of the low 730's in HD.

The game is on 737 HD. It's confusing though, because the guide has it listed as women's basketball. It's part of a sports package that costs about $5.00/month.
 
Last edited:
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

The game is on 737 HD. It's confusing though, because the guide has it listed as women's basketball.

Thanks for the info, but I apparently don't have whatever package is required to receive that because there's just a banner that says women's bball and "Not Authorized" just above the CBSCH in the middle of the screen. I was at the Alfond and saw it there, but it would be fun to watch it on TV too. I wonder what package I'd need to be able to receive that channel. Oops, I see you answered that question already.

So, how are the Bears looking tonight?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info, but I apparently don't have whatever package is required to receive that because there's just a banner that says women's bball and "Not Authorized" just above the CBSCH in the middle of the screen. I was at the Alfond and saw it there, but it would be fun to watch it on TV too. I wonder what package I'd need to be able to receive that channel. So, how are the Bears looking tonight?

You can call Time Warner and receive the program within 10 minutes. You also receive mid-west fox sports and NHL games. The Bears look fantastic!!
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

Thanks for the info, but I apparently don't have whatever package is required to receive that because there's just a banner that says women's bball and "Not Authorized" just above the CBSCH in the middle of the screen. I was at the Alfond and saw it there, but it would be fun to watch it on TV too. I wonder what package I'd need to be able to receive that channel. Oops, I see you answered that question already.

So, how are the Bears looking tonight?

You probably did have it up until about a month ago I believe, then Time Warner cut it just like several other channels like IFC etc. without warning or notice. ****ed me off...
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

After seeing Sirman the other night, I'm confused as to why he isn't in there at least every other game.
Have only seen Sirman once and Sully 3 times (1@BU and 2 @ BC), and I'm not sold on Sully... he fills a lot of net, but is not real quick on his feet.
Sirman looked pretty darn good to me, especially on the penalty shot. Good skater, good glove, quick on his feet. Maybe he just had the game of his life on Sunday?

No, you're pretty on. Let me give you the background:

The knock on Sirman this year was his freshman year performance. He came in last year to back up 'Oh-My-Daaaaarling-You're-A-Lush', and he was nicely regarded. He had propelled his team to an unexpected playoff push in juniors the year before, and INCH ranked him #2 among incoming sieves.

Unfortunately, aside from 1 win against UMass, and a great exhibition performance against U-18 (only goalie to shut them out last year), his play was pretty horrid. Let's put it this way...remember when Darling was suspended during the end of the year? Remember who we had in net instead?? Yea.....that's all you need to know.

He admitted in an interview at the end of the year: "I was not in game-shape for this level of play". His innate skills were there, but his physical condition and mental readiness was not.

He commtted himself last offseason to changing that and stepping up. He did. I think they said he lost, what? 15 or 20 pounds?? And he really just drilled himself training and practicing. Now, I'm not going to call him Jimmy Howard, but I definitely saw an improved player when he stepped out there this year... I quickly saw glimpses of the player people thought he could turn into.


Despite picking up Martin Ouellette, true freshman taken by Columbus in the last draft, Shawn obviously was showing good things and Tim announced him as: our opening day #1 in what will be a 3 horse race and rotation.

As I pointed out: his 1st 3 regular season games all had some kind of added pressure. Our home opener (shake the rust, prove yourself as the new #1), game 1 with North Dakota (pressure cooker), and @ Michigan State for their home opener (same deal).

He stopped 77 of the first 86 shots he faced as the new #1. Of those 9 goals against: 4 were power play goals (help him out a bit PK), 1 was a shorthanded breakaway (wake up power play), and 1 was an extremely flukey goal off the side of his skate against NoDak after the game was long decided. Those were 6 of the 9. My point is: despite playing some good competition, early in the season, in a new role...he played well but at anything, his stats probably DIDNT do him any real justice.


After that....Tim just stopped playing him. Period. We weren't given any rhyme or reason. Everyone just started man-crushing Sullivan and that was the end of that. Don't get me wrong: I like Dan's calm demeanor and I have confidence in his development, but I've really never seen a coach handle his goalies as poorly as Tim has.
 
Last edited:
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

Sorry for the ridiculously long response FiveHole, haha. Didn't realize it until I finished typing. If you read our thread, you'll know the top 5 things I'm obnoxiously out and clearly overspoken about are:

1. Sirman should still be our #1 until he fails to earn it
2. I wish we had 3 Matt Mangene clones. That way, he could play on the 3rd line, the other 3 would be our 4th line, and none of them would play defense.
3. I am all about Mike Cornell and Brice O'Connor on defense, and I die a little bit inside when Tim scratches 16, or has 2 playing wing. ***?
4. Gustav's lack out standout play is a reflection of other teams' gameplans around him and not his own developmental regression.
5. TIMMAY!!!!
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

FWIW,I saw Sirman on the road at Merrimack last year,and he was terrific.Made a bunch of great saves behind a Maine D that was playing like moose dung.

From what I've seen,Maine has three competent goalies,but I'd play Sirman this weekend,even if all of them were healthy.My second choice would be Marty,'cause I like the way he controls/steers aside rebounds,but I have no big problem with Sully,either. Maine is far better off in net this year than I thought they'd be.

As far as the road record goes,I was at PC this season and Maine was playing kinda like one of Shawn's teams,SOG be ****ed.They were like 0.02 seconds away from taking four points from an under-rated Friars squad,so I think maybe the Bears be all right on strange ice,as long as they show up to play.

As far as the TUC thing,it's really a superfluous stat anyway...RPI already takes into account SOS. There is no need to dream up another arbitrary cliff to fall off,especially if it's redundant.The more teams that are included in this ridiculous category,the more it pays to under-schedule your competition.

Get rid of it!
 
Last edited:
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

Tim's handling of goalies has always been trick or treat. Mostly trick.
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

After seeing Sirman the other night, I'm confused as to why he isn't in there at least every other game.

Us fans remember the Lowell series last spring, he was less than stellar. But he certainly looked looked good against BC so maybe he has it figured out. I think he has to go against NU Saturday to see if he can keep it up. It'd be nice to have a #1 goalie instead of a guess or gut feeling as to who plays
 
Re: Maine Black Bears 2010-2011 - Part Deux

2. I wish we had 3 Matt Mangene clones. That way, he could play on the 3rd line, the other 3 would be our 4th line, and none of them would play defense.

I agree with the sentiment 110%. My only concern is that if Timmay had 3 Mangenes, one would end up playing goalie at some point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top