COLD AS ICE
Registered User
Re: Harvard Crimson 2013-2014
I think we can officially raise the expectations from a " bridge year" and a sixth or seventh place finish. There is no question the bench is short and there is virtually no depth. None the less, the Cornell game showed they can play at a very high level against a highly rated opponent. It was also encouraging that the following day, even though they looked a step slower from the Cornell game, they still managed to beat Colgate 2-0. It was especially encouraging that the 3 stars of the game were all freshmen. Rachlin, Mastel, and Daniels may not be Pucci, Picard, and Fry, but they have all shown they can play at the college level from Day 1. Why not an NCAA berth this year?
Is it a given that we will be without Fry, Picard and Pucci? Not to take anything away from these players because they are all very talented but Pucci is coming off a severe concussion and I didn't realize Fry and Picard were under consideration. Not having Fry with Jillian Dempsey lost to graduation leaves the Crimson with some severe scoring problems.
This will be a bridge year to 2014-2015. The best we can hope for is that we finish sixth or seventh in the conference and pull an upset in the quarters. That would be huge.
I think we can officially raise the expectations from a " bridge year" and a sixth or seventh place finish. There is no question the bench is short and there is virtually no depth. None the less, the Cornell game showed they can play at a very high level against a highly rated opponent. It was also encouraging that the following day, even though they looked a step slower from the Cornell game, they still managed to beat Colgate 2-0. It was especially encouraging that the 3 stars of the game were all freshmen. Rachlin, Mastel, and Daniels may not be Pucci, Picard, and Fry, but they have all shown they can play at the college level from Day 1. Why not an NCAA berth this year?