What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Gophers-Huskies Home and Home Jan 27-28

Re: Gophers-Huskies Home and Home Jan 27-28

Since you are now a Whioux fan... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mehF5iUrkuM

You know your team sucks when you have to use highlights from a different team defending your team. Marsha, Marsha, Marsha!

Hey dickweasel, we scored twice on Frazee from our own zone in one game that season, but I can't find them on YouTube. The point wasn't that the Gophers suck, the point I was making is that that is the worst scoring opportunity of a goal I've ever seen.

EDIT: I can say dickweasel? Oh USCHO... how random are arbitrary are you?
 
Re: Gophers-Huskies Home and Home Jan 27-28

hey dickweasel, we scored twice on frazee from our own zone in one game that season, but i can't find them on youtube. The point wasn't that the gophers suck, the point i was making is that that is the worst scoring opportunity of a goal i've ever seen.

Edit: I can say dickweasel? Oh uscho... How random are arbitrary are you?
:D
Nice editing USCHO. Keep changing the capital D to lowercase. :p
 
...

No, it wasn't. Just because there's a goal doesn't mean it was a quality scoring chance. Thus, Euro's link to Robbie Bina scoring on Jeff Frazee from the opposite red line.

Yeah, lots of similarity between those goals :rolleyes: Had Hansen not scored, the opportunity most certainly would have been labeled a quality scoring chance (Hansen drove to the net alone). To say otherwise is asinine. Hence, your statement was wrong. And not just wrong, but stupid.
 
Last edited:
Re: Gophers-Huskies Home and Home Jan 27-28

That was a good game, St Cloud is a very solid team. The look on Motzko's face when Travis Novak went down was one of "how much more can go wrong with this effen season"! Imo, that team is very well coached and had/has plenty of talent, right on the bubble for competing with any team in the league.
 
Hey dickweasel, we scored twice on Frazee from our own zone in one game that season, but I can't find them on YouTube. The point wasn't that the Gophers suck, the point I was making is that that is the worst scoring opportunity of a goal I've ever seen.

EDIT: I can say dickweasel? Oh USCHO... how random are arbitrary are you?

EDIT: My bad, misunderstood your post.
 
Last edited:
And he had a good angle to the net and was most unabated with a guy coming in with him. For the record, I'd call that a quality scoring chance, I'm just saying the Doobs made it sound like any goalie is a quality scoring chance. Had he said what you said, no need to relive a goal scored by a man who sees MEg eye-to-eye

No, that wasn't what I said at all. I said Hansen scored in the first period and anyone watching the game who has any idea what they're talking about knows it was a quality look. You guys just inferred that I meant any goal scored is the result of a quality chance.
 
For jumping to the conclusion that I meant all goals are the result of quality scoring chances, then calling me out for that.

I called you out bc while understanding what you meant to say, I found a fallacy in what you actually said, and had fun with it. Luckily for you I am the only person on the internet that exaggerates what other people say. But you're right, a person can admit when they're wrong, so I apologize for assuming you knew what was going on, I didn't mean for you get RwD's panties in a bunch.
 
I called you out bc while understanding what you meant to say, I found a fallacy in what you actually said, and had fun with it. Luckily for you I am the only person on the internet that exaggerates what other people say. But you're right, a person can admit when they're wrong, so I apologize for assuming you knew what was going on, I didn't mean for you get RwD's panties in a bunch.

Didn't know you were just messing with me. Sorry for being so uptight. I have a hard time figuring out when people are being serious and not.

And touché on the panties bit :)
 
Re: Gophers-Huskies Home and Home Jan 27-28

To be fair...shooting the puck in Frazee's general direction could have been considered a quality scoring chance.
 
I think it is funny when SCCC fans talk about the chants at mariucci and how they are the same every game. I mean this is the fanbase that still dances to Cotton Eye Joe, scream "F the Gophers" and their claim to fame is "sieving" to every song on the Jock Rock CDs. :p

And dont deny it is still that way, I was up there for the Gopher game earlier this year...minus the massive amounts of empty seats it could have been any game from any season dating back to 1998.

So tell me again about how uncreative we are ;)

edit: Dont expect Dude Love to know what actually happened in the game...he was too busy trying to figure out how to sieve to "Let's Go Gophers".

No one has danced to cotton eye joe in like 5 years. Also, saying "f the gophers was never intended to be clever. The gopher fans still think their chants are funny.
 
Back
Top