What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Gender Studies I

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have to laugh more and more at the suggestion I need to move.

Drove into Eastown and East Hills in Grand Rapids today (5 minutes away from my house) with nearly every shop in those neighborhoods flying both BLM and Pride flags. Lots of neat little places to hang out here, especially places that won't force me to relapse. Inevitably, every fucking region of this country has a fair amount of derps and drunken dope addicts and glue sniffers, some are just better at hiding it, that's all.
 
I would think the rainbow should suffice to display the wide array of possibilities and inclusion.

From a design standpoint, yes. The triangle alone was a design nightmare.

I'd rather have the rainbow and various stripey flags outside than something clunky and hard to look at.
 
So, again: how, exactly, does allowing transgender women to use the ladies room cause heterosexual men to act *worse*? If they are such scum, what has kept them out of the ladies room for the last 150 years? Allowing trans women in does not change a single thing about what behavior is acceptable for heterosexual men.

So, here we go again...

Consider the absolute certainty of an straight man deciding that he indentifies as a woman on a given day, and ergo is free to hang out in in the ladies' at the Y..?

If you don't believe that will happen, you are beyond naive.

Trans people won't be the problem, grasshopper, it'll be the straight men every effing time.

You really need to get out in the world a little more. Facts is facts.
 
Last edited:
So, here we go again...

Consider the absolute certainty of an straight man deciding that he indentifies as a woman on a given day, and ergo is free to hang out in in the ladies' at the Y..?

If you don't believe that will happen, you are beyond naive.

You realize transgender people have been around since the beginning of time, right? You also realize men have been hanging out in women’s bathrooms since the beginning of time without the “transgender excuse”? I’m going to guess there’s more cases of voter fraud in this country than cases of men pretending to be women to justify going into the women’s bathroom. What a ridiculous argument.
 
So, here we go again...

Consider the absolute certainty of an straight man deciding that he indentifies as a woman on a given day, and ergo is free to hang out in in the ladies' at the Y..?

If you don't believe that will happen, you are beyond naive.

Trans people won't be the issue, straight men will
 
So, here we go again...

Consider the absolute certainty of an straight man deciding that he indentifies as a woman on a given day, and ergo is free to hang out in in the ladies' at the Y..?

If you don't believe that will happen, you are beyond naive.

Trans people won't be the issue, straight men will

Straight men are always an issue. They’ve been going into women’s bathrooms and up women’s skirts and unwanted into their homes for centuries. So your proposal is to fuck over transgender people because straight guys have always fucking sucked?
 
How can a non-Islamic legal code protect polygamy for men but not for women? "Traditional family values"? What would be the actual legal standard?
 
Last edited:
Since people keep quoting the derp: how can one justify persecuting a sincere group (trans women) because of what a hypothesized criminal group (straight men posing as trans women to molest girls) might do?

This is "you can't allow people to drive cars because renegade children might drive cars illegally." It's that stupid.

We do not deny people their basic human rights because unscrupulous others hatched from our imagination might take try to take advantage of those rights.

The only reason the derp even considers this a valid argument is because he doesn't see trans people as human, so abridgment of their rights is no biggie (c.f., abortion). I do not why you engage with him. He is obviously a spiteful, cowardly bigot. When you extend him even the courtesy of debate you invite him to poison this forum, and you are dehumanizing not just the trans people of the forum but all of us.

This person is unworthy of your time or even your acknowledgement. His fear and hatred are exactly what has driven the bigotry of all ages. Shut him down by shutting him off. I'm begging you.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top