What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Dude!! I still hear this is BUSH'S mess! BO seems to have not had a chance to do anything yet.

Mookie=wrong

Unemployment?

6a00d834fd816853ef01287771ff58970c-500wi


Business earnings and health?

7041777339_d59db38a1b_z.jpg


Meanwhile I think we'll start to be hearing more about what matters here:

What is Romney's position on anything? What is Romney's platform on anything? Romney is outshining John Kerry on all Kerry's weaknesses.
 
Mookie=wrong

Unemployment?

6a00d834fd816853ef01287771ff58970c-500wi


Business earnings and health?

7041777339_d59db38a1b_z.jpg


Meanwhile I think we'll start to be hearing more about what matters here:

What is Romney's position on anything? What is Romney's platform on anything? Romney is outshining John Kerry on all Kerry's weaknesses.
That first graph...are you trying to be funny?

What would that graph have looked like if Elmo was president? Continued job loss at the same volumes?
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!


With time to craft a measured clarification, the follow up was: "Of course, there will be errors from time to time, but those are all overshadowed by the extraordinary demonstrations of courage, character and determination by the athletes."

Nice for the athletes...a continued backhand to the host.

That first graph...are you trying to be funny?

What would that graph have looked like if Elmo was president? Continued job loss at the same volumes?

The numbers are what they are...not sure what your spin is here.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

The numbers are what they are...not sure what your spin is here.

no spin from me, that is 100% in that graph and your post. You referred to it as unemployment...then showed a graph of job loss. Those are two related items, but not the same. The graph, and its clever red/blue motif are clearly designed to give the casual viewer the impression that something good has happened since Obama took over.

it depends on whether the viewer would ever suspect that job losses could have continued at the same volume for years...if the viewer thinks that is possible, then it doesn't matter what I type...if the viewer thinks it is not only logical, but obvious that job loss wouldn't be consistent and would spike and then subside then the graph is similar to the one that says global warming has reduced the number of pirates in the world (which is funny)
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

To claim job losses couldn't be expected to continue ignores the stretches between Sep 53 - Aug 54, Aug 74 - Jun 75, Aug 81 - Feb 83, Jul 90 - May 91 and, Jan 01 - Sep 02. It can happen. When it comes to job/loss growth not all presidents are created equal.

President Pct. change
Truman 21%
Eisenhower 7%
Kennedy 7%
Johnson 21%
Nixon 13%
Ford 3%
Carter 13%
Reagan 18%
Bush 2%
Clinton 21%
Bush 1%

Obviously there are dozens of factors that contribute well beyond the sitting President. UE spiked at 10% in late 2009 and had dropped to 8.2% as of the end of June. Hopefully that trend continues.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

no spin from me, that is 100% in that graph and your post. You referred to it as unemployment...then showed a graph of job loss. Those are two related items, but not the same. The graph, and its clever red/blue motif are clearly designed to give the casual viewer the impression that something good has happened since Obama took over.

it depends on whether the viewer would ever suspect that job losses could have continued at the same volume for years...if the viewer thinks that is possible, then it doesn't matter what I type...if the viewer thinks it is not only logical, but obvious that job loss wouldn't be consistent and would spike and then subside then the graph is similar to the one that says global warming has reduced the number of pirates in the world (which is funny)

That's right. I did refer to unemployment...of which job losses is the driver. From what I'm reading, your saying we don't know if job losses would have subsided without Obama. It is a long discussion point just how much impact the government has on the economy...yet Obama has been in office and instituted many economic policies during a time when the economy stablized and business health/earnings have recovered. That's what can be said.

Likewise, Mookie pretty much said that 'this mess' was not handed to Obama...and inferred that nothing's been accomplished under Obama. The graphs both show neither of those to be true.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

No, mookie said that if anyone brings up the bad side of the ecOnomy or unemployment it is still BUSH'S fault and what BO was forced to deal with...
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

No, mookie said that if anyone brings up the bad side of the ecOnomy or unemployment it is still BUSH'S fault and what BO was forced to deal with...

It is, but unfortunately for Obama it's around his neck now. That being said NO ONE should underestimate the devastation left in this country by Bush and Cheney.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

It is, but unfortunately for Obama it's around his neck now. That being said NO ONE should underestimate the devastation left in this country by Bush and Cheney.

sure. and if carter didn't come in on the heels of Whip Inflation Now! and right after vietnam where our nation didn't want to have anything to do foreign wise and that didn't embolden foreigners to think they could take over an embassy -- he coulda been a great president.

life goes on.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

sure. and if carter didn't come in on the heels of Whip Inflation Now! and right after vietnam where our nation didn't want to have anything to do foreign wise and that didn't embolden foreigners to think they could take over an embassy -- he coulda been a great president.

life goes on.
John Wayne died. That's why they took over the Embassy.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Progressive income tax rates have been widely and generally accepted by most people for a long time, and I haven't heard anyone suggest otherwise.

Seriously? The Tea Party pushes the Fair Tax, Flat Tax, or other variations of a non-progressive tax system all the farking time. Are you being willfully ignorant or simply obtuse?
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Seriously? The Tea Party pushes the Fair Tax, Flat Tax, or other variations of a non-progressive tax system all the farking time. Are you being willfully ignorant or simply obtuse?
That's because the current tax code excludes a lot of income. The 2nd (underground) economy is huge. The question becomes do you want to tax it, too? Some argue that the underground economy fuels the 1st economy and to disrupt it screws everything up.
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Didn't anyone else's mother teach them that when you point a finger at someone else you simultaneously point three fingers at yourself too?
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Didn't anyone else's mother teach them that when you point a finger at someone else you simultaneously point three fingers at yourself too?
Correct. No one else's mother taught them that. :)
 
Re: Elections 2012 -- Kull Wahad!!!

Didn't anyone else's mother teach them that when you point a finger at someone else you simultaneously point three fingers at yourself too?

And for his next trick, I believe we're going to see the "I'm rubber, you're glue" defense.

Correct. No one else's mother taught them that. :)

Maybe because unless you have arthritis, your fingers should bend more than 180 degrees...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top