What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Ebola - all or nothing?

None of the television politico talking heads believe their spewage*. I figured that out long, long ago, when I found out Mary Matalin and James Carville are married.

* (c) 2014, The Sicatoka

hey. wait. I've been saying that for years. most of them are actors in "reality" shows. all the yelling screaming heated debate - put on for the cameras. Michael Moore - Sean Hannity are close friends. Rush Limbaugh laughs all the way to the bank. as does Jon Stewart, Bill Maher and Stephen Colbert. no way can you copyright it. I'll sue. :)
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

So, people with existing underlying issues don't deserve the same protections as some would suggest are needed for all of us from people who don't actually have ebola or haven't shown symptoms?

People with such underlying conditions view the flu as a real life-threatening risk.


I'm not in favor of the state mandated isolating of people who have the flu, but I don't think you can separate ebola from the conversation simply because it's the virus du jour.

But like thousands in the US have died...errr...hundreds in the US have died...wait dozens have died in the US...ok well more than zero have died!! I bet more people die of The Plague this year in the US than Ebola...
 
Last edited:
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

Surely between "lock em all up" and "let my people go" there is a middle ground that is governed by common sense?
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

So, people with existing underlying issues don't deserve the same protections as some would suggest are needed for all of us from people who don't actually have ebola or haven't shown symptoms?

People with such underlying conditions view the flu as a real life-threatening risk.


I'm not in favor of the state mandated isolating of people who have the flu, but I don't think you can separate ebola from the conversation simply because it's the virus du jour.
What I'm saying is that while flu is a very real threat for a subset of population, it's not for the vast majority of us. I know I could get the flu this year. And I'll be miserable for awhile. But I also know the odds are extremely strong it won't kill me.

Most people think the same way. And they are right. That's why there is not the call for quarantines you see with Ebola.

I think the fact that a couple of people have been infected with the disease in this country, and have survived, is extremely positive. Once people see that with good medical care exposure to this virus isn't the same as a bullet to the head, the panic will die off considerably.
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

I think the fact that a couple of people have been infected with the disease in this country, and have survived, is extremely positive. Once people see that with good medical care exposure to this virus isn't the same as a bullet to the head, the panic will die off considerably.
Not to worry - if the laissez faire attitude rules the day, I'm sure we'll get your wish of many more ebola cases to experiment on....
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

If you're afraid of Ebola vote Republican. They won't fund the CDC or research for a cure, but they'll quarantine everyone for you.
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

Look up "the lily pad problem." If we wait until there are thousands of deaths, it's far too late - it's awfully hard to put that toothpaste back in the tube.

Can we get to double digits before you start interning people at least? Vince Neil has killed as many people as Ebola in this country. More people probably die falling down the stairs daily than have died by Ebola in this country since it was discovered. Not everyone with a fever is gonna start bleeding out of their eyeballs.

And I love your "laissez faire" comment...but you arent fear mongering NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! Ebola forbid we actually wait for some proof of the coming pandemic before we start freaking out and stuff. I mean if it could happen in the movie Outbreak...
 
Last edited:
Not to worry - if the laissez faire attitude rules the day, I'm sure we'll get your wish of many more ebola cases to experiment on....

If Ebola were as contagious as you seem to think, we'd have had a world wide pandemic decades ago.

Unless you're handling bodily fluids of the sick, dying, or dead, your odds of getting Ebola are approximately on par with winning the power ball jackpot tomorrow.
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

If Ebola were as contagious as you seem to think, we'd have had a world wide pandemic decades ago.

Unless you're handling bodily fluids of the sick, dying, or dead, your odds of getting Ebola are approximately on par with winning the power ball jackpot tomorrow.

Sweet...cause according to Lynah I am gonna get Ebola like yesterday so I am gonna start spending my jackpot money now!!
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

hey. wait. I've been saying that for years. most of them are actors in "reality" shows. all the yelling screaming heated debate - put on for the cameras. Michael Moore - Sean Hannity are close friends. Rush Limbaugh laughs all the way to the bank. as does Jon Stewart, Bill Maher and Stephen Colbert. no way can you copyright it. I'll sue. :)

I'm only claiming the term: spewage*. :D

* (c) 2014 The Sicatoka
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

What I'm saying is that while flu is a very real threat for a subset of population, it's not for the vast majority of us. I know I could get the flu this year. And I'll be miserable for awhile. But I also know the odds are extremely strong it won't kill me.
We're talking about a much larger subset of the population that could potentially get the flu and die from it though. As evidenced by the fact that more people contract it and some have actually died from it.

Unless you're handling bodily fluids of the sick, dying, or dead, your odds of getting Ebola are approximately on par with winning the power ball jackpot tomorrow.
I don't want to play with Magic Johnson cuz I might get AIDS
 
Last edited:
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

There was a terrific radio program on BBC this morning about pandemics and historical efforts to prevent or contain them. Especially fascinating is the story of the eradication of smallpox. I believe the show was called "Inquiry." I'll try to find a canned version of it on the Beeb, because I think everyone would benefit from listening to it.
 
Re: Ebola - all or nothing?

What are you playing with?

A basketball.

Karl Malone said:
"Just because he came back doesn't mean nothing to me, I'm no fan, no cheerleader. It may be good for basketball, but you have to look far beyond that. You have a lot of young men who have a long life ahead of them. The Dream Team was a concept everybody loved. But now we're back to reality."
 
Back
Top