What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Dump Term 2, Part 2: "A third term would be a big shattering."


NoDak isnt sending us their best...or maybe they are? All this waste of carbon does is sit around eating the fresh made cookies he makes his staff bake. Literally...
 
Except it does because you didn't imply it in your post...
RIght, because everyone here thought the GQP is looking to make cuts uniformly. Why are you being so pedantic about this?

Both things are true - they're not looking to cut "fairly" and and when they have made cuts they were made with an axe not a scalpel.
 
RIght, because everyone here thought the GQP is looking to make cuts uniformly. Why are you being so pedantic about this?

Both things are true - they're not looking to cut "fairly" and and when they have made cuts they were made with an axe not a scalpel.
"Not cutting evenly" and "Cutting some things while growing others" are two fundamentally different things, so I get where Handy is coming from. Not cutting evenly still guarantees that there will be a net cut to the size of government.

Cutting a $150M from the national parks while adding $150B to defense is not smaller government.

"You know what the difference is between $1M and $1B?"
"$1B"
 

Wow...
 
"Not cutting evenly" and "Cutting some things while growing others" are two fundamentally different things, so I get where Handy is coming from. Not cutting evenly still guarantees that there will be a net cut to the size of government.
That's not really what I said but perhaps I worded it poorly. Yet I would think knowing what they are actually doing the intent of my statement would be obvious.

When I said they want to shrink the government I meant specifically in regards to "liberal programs". Of course they don't have any plans to shrink the defense department.
 
fuck off Gretchen. Now she’s Talking about a constitutional Crisis


Edit- my spelling and capitalization is even more effed as before, im testing in some languages and my Keyboard is all messed up
 
They've destroyed the greatest country that has ever existed on Planet Earth. And they did it in 100 days. And, the 4th estate has been just about completely complicit.
 
Back
Top