Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: College Football IV: The Hand over Fist Cash Grab Time, or Bowl Season for short.
The USC boards have been in meltdown mode since Scam Newton first appeared to have impropriety. I think they've officially gone past meltdown mode with this Ohio State fiasco.
I'm of the opinion that its going to end up in court since the NCAA isn't even following its own rules for punishment. With Bush, they made up an entirely new rule to punish USC, saying Bush was "high profile." Then, when Scam Newton was caught, they said: "there aren't rules in place to punish Newton, this is a loophole we will try to close." What, nothing prevented you from making up new rules to punish USC, right? What stopped you from making up new rules (and IMO just enforcing your existing rules and declaring Newton ineligible.)
To show how biased the NCAA is against USC, USC self reported Dillon Baxter because he got a ride in a golf cart. It took over a week to have the NCAA reinstate his eligibility and he paid the value of the ride back to the guy who gave the ride.
Newton was declared ineligible by Auburn and reinstated in ONE day by the NCAA. After all the info they had on Scam's daddy and Scam, it only took a day? Really?
The appeal for USC happens in January. Expect nothing to happen. Then USC will sue the NCAA in federal court and we'll see what happens from there.
The USC boards have been in meltdown mode since Scam Newton first appeared to have impropriety. I think they've officially gone past meltdown mode with this Ohio State fiasco.
I'm of the opinion that its going to end up in court since the NCAA isn't even following its own rules for punishment. With Bush, they made up an entirely new rule to punish USC, saying Bush was "high profile." Then, when Scam Newton was caught, they said: "there aren't rules in place to punish Newton, this is a loophole we will try to close." What, nothing prevented you from making up new rules to punish USC, right? What stopped you from making up new rules (and IMO just enforcing your existing rules and declaring Newton ineligible.)
To show how biased the NCAA is against USC, USC self reported Dillon Baxter because he got a ride in a golf cart. It took over a week to have the NCAA reinstate his eligibility and he paid the value of the ride back to the guy who gave the ride.
Newton was declared ineligible by Auburn and reinstated in ONE day by the NCAA. After all the info they had on Scam's daddy and Scam, it only took a day? Really?
The appeal for USC happens in January. Expect nothing to happen. Then USC will sue the NCAA in federal court and we'll see what happens from there.