Re: Colgate 2011-12
obviously, love the game, love the result...great for Austin and great for those who've been snakebit recently, Prockow, etc. Having won the game I'd like to mention the competency of refereeing in the ECAC (much better to do after a win, rather than a tough loss)...the job of the referees is to call the game consistently as they (however imperfectly) interpret the rules...the refs tonight were awful, and especially awful in the last couple of minutes...we live in such a politically correct society that apparently the refs have decided that with the score 8-1 they have some sort of God-given obligation to make the losing team feel better (hence the two ridiculous - or at least one really ridiculous call - against the 'Gate)...frankly, I'd feel the same way if we were getting whacked 8-1...this is BS...in the last period RPI played with class - legitimate hits, no cheap stuff, etc. - and I would expect that from a school with a great academic and hockey tradition. They don't need the "sympathy" of referees who have decided that an 8-1 final is too much of negative self-esteem issue for the Engineers. They can handle it; they've come back from a really bad season to become a good hockey team, not unlike our resurrection late last year. This reminds me of the new rule in Connecticut high school football (Conn the most liberal and pathetic state this side of Vermont) that you are not allowed to win by more than 50 points in a high school football game...in other words, play the kids who've ridden the bench for a few years and tell him to tank...a minor point perhaps, but so cultural in nature I feel compelled to mention it...otherwise...YES YES YES YES ...Evin looked really good in the nets (hopefully both goalies will push each other for playing time)...AUSTIN RULES...GO GATE
"