Re: Campaign 2016 - People lie the most after a hunt, during a war or before an elect
Yep. 100% all the time is fringe. 100% none of the time is also fringe. (Me? 99% no) I think there is a goodly % that favor some sort of restrictions. However, the money is at 100% all of the time. And HRC is all about the money.
If 100% of the time is fringe, then how can the money be there?
Even though
Roe v Wade was decided on bad reasoning, the trimester rule is a good one and actually has a long history behind it.
Roe isn't fringe, and it says in the first trimester a woman's (well, a doctor's, which is why it was decided wrongly) choice of abortion is legitimate 100% of the time. That is not fringe.
If you're saying that 100% of the time for the entire length of the pregnancy is fringe, that's true, but there also probably isn't a single person on Earth who holds that view.
The opinions that are logically defensible, to me, are:
(1) Always wrong.
(2) Always wrong except when life of mother is at risk, in which case pick whichever has the best chance to pull through.
(3) Always wrong except when life of mother is at risk, in which case pick the mother.
(4) First trimester fine except when life of mother is at risk, in which case pick whichever has the best chance to pull through.
(5) First trimester fine except when life of mother is at risk, in which case pick the mother.
(1) Is the Catholic view.
(2) Would be a Utilitarian pro-life position which I've never heard anybody advocate.
(3) Is the mainstream political pro-life position.
(4) Would be a Utilitarian pro-choice position which I've never heard anybody advocate.
(5) Is the mainstream political pro-choice position.
The rape and incest exceptions muddy the waters, but they make no sense anyway. They are about punishing women for inviting sex and are feudal.