Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 - I'm Biden my time till I doctor the hearing.
The point is, we haven't changed.
Kep, we've changed.
The point is, we haven't changed.
Kep, we've changed.
Of course we've changed from the idolized version of whatever slice of americana he grew up with that never really existed for anyone else.The point is, we haven't changed.
He’s chosen a campaign strategy of using media attention to lock up roughly one-quarter of the primary vote, and in doing so, mortgaged off his chances of winning the presidency.
This appears to be accurate. The only real question is whether Trump will crash and burn before or after the nomination. Democrats hope he gets nominated.
Or runs independent.
As long as the rest of us don't have to pay for your kids!How about this for a campaign issue - the high cost of child (day) care.
This appears to be accurate. The only real question is whether Trump will crash and burn before or after the nomination. Democrats hope he gets nominated.
Yeah, that would be interesting. It would surely lock in Hillary for a landslide, right?
Not really. The problem is Obama almost ran the battleground states in 2012.
If Trump ran Indy I suspect he would get around 15% of the total electorate, virtually all of from the right. The only question would be how much of that would be new voters and how much just robbed from the Republican? Let's say 9% was robbed from the GOP, 5% new voters, and 1% robbed from very confused Democrats.
Chopping a net 8% off the GOP 2012 result would turn the following states blue: NC (15), NE-2 (1), GA (16). Basically, 2008, with GA swapping in for the inexplicable IN. 360ish-170ish is solid, but to get Hillary to 400 Trump would probably need to steal a net 12% or so from the Republican total. That would put AZ (11), MO(10), IN (11) and SC (11) in play, and I think we can all agree that if SC goes blue that's a landslide.![]()
This article makes a fatal flaw that is a hallmark of Beltway punditry
He'd steal that from Rubio I think but not from Ted Cruz. There's not a lot of daylight between Cruz and Trump so no need for Republican voters to abandon the party unless they just really don't like a guy with a Hispanic last name representing them. Trump would hammer Rubio on his previous support for immigration reform. Not sure what he'd go after Cruz on from the right as the dude's pretty far out there.
Either Cruz gets the nomination this time, and right now its either him or Trump who wins, or he's the leading candidate in 2020. He's set himself up well.
The problem there is Cruz is Trump's double on the issues, so a Goldwateresque implosion would cast Cruz' electability into doubt not just in the nation but in the party. Plus Cruz can count and he knows with every year his brand of wingnuttery is shared by a rapidly evaporating backwater of the electorate.
Not to mention there's the End of Days coming, so if Ted wants to be prez he has to get to it before being hoist Lorax-like into fundy puppy heaven.
It comes down to whether Cruz is a high class con man or a tin pot dictator. If the former, he needs to be denied the nomination in some agonizingly dramatic way, better yet because of dirty tricks from Reince and the RNC, so he can rake in tens if not hundreds of millions for the rest of his life by re-enacting The Passion of the Ted via every monetizable medium to milk the suckers dry. If the latter, he needs a Night of the Long Knives a few weeks before Cleveland, where he backstabs the rank and file blackshirts who got him close, and then seduces the Money Men by saying, "see -- I took care of the thugs and am ready to be a submissive corporate con." Plenty of time after the inaugural to get The Plan back on track.
Cruz is as insane as he appears to be. His college roommate likes to still mock him.
http://www.alternet.org/election-20...former-college-roommate-who-turned-successful