Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
invest in spell check or stop drinking before posting.
invest in spell check or stop drinking before posting.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
- Thread starter Friend_of_BU_Hockey
- Start date
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
were you behind the net when our defenseman tried to check the mack forward skating into the zone who easily curved around him and had a 3 on 1 where millan could do absolutely nothing? were you behind the net for the PP goal in the 3rd when the shot from the point was tipped twice on its way into the net? were you behind the net when the mack guy on a breakaway roofed a backhander - where he was in virtually alone because our guys were too busy being ****ed off about allowing the goal directly before it to pay attention to what was going on?
is your only purpose in life to attempt to prove that millan is a poor goaltender?
you could not be more wrong and off-base with your comments about tonights game. if you were playing darts, you just hit the doorframe.
were you behind the net when our defenseman tried to check the mack forward skating into the zone who easily curved around him and had a 3 on 1 where millan could do absolutely nothing? were you behind the net for the PP goal in the 3rd when the shot from the point was tipped twice on its way into the net? were you behind the net when the mack guy on a breakaway roofed a backhander - where he was in virtually alone because our guys were too busy being ****ed off about allowing the goal directly before it to pay attention to what was going on?
is your only purpose in life to attempt to prove that millan is a poor goaltender?
you could not be more wrong and off-base with your comments about tonights game. if you were playing darts, you just hit the doorframe.
Last edited:
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
6-0-0 at home is great.
i noticed that the home crowd has seen two straight wins over the igles, then our boys. has that ever happened before?
then next up in uhn... i may come up to see that next next sunday.
6-0-0 at home is great.
i noticed that the home crowd has seen two straight wins over the igles, then our boys. has that ever happened before?
then next up in uhn... i may come up to see that next next sunday.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
here i thought he was just typing while driving home
(thjat is reallly, really hardto do..)
here i thought he was just typing while driving home
(thjat is reallly, really hardto do..)
SteveF
* * * * *
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
well 'mack hadnt beaten BC since 2003.. so its unlikely. I did find this from 2004 when they pulled off a 4-4 tie vs BC and then a 3-1 win over BU on back to back thursdays
http://www.uscho.com/schedules/team...-hockey/team,mc/season,20032004/gender,m.html
well 'mack hadnt beaten BC since 2003.. so its unlikely. I did find this from 2004 when they pulled off a 4-4 tie vs BC and then a 3-1 win over BU on back to back thursdays
http://www.uscho.com/schedules/team...-hockey/team,mc/season,20032004/gender,m.html
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
and that win over BU was the last time we'd dropped a point to them.
and that win over BU was the last time we'd dropped a point to them.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
____________________Scoring_______Shots on Goal
Boston University 0-1-0--1_______8-12-14--34
Merrimack 0-2-1--3_______9-8-1--18
ugh, i think i was there.... what an abortion of a season that was
(though the he-qf tried to get something out of it )
____________________Scoring_______Shots on Goal
Boston University 0-1-0--1_______8-12-14--34
Merrimack 0-2-1--3_______9-8-1--18
ugh, i think i was there.... what an abortion of a season that was
(though the he-qf tried to get something out of it )
yankeefn01
my cats breath smells like cat food
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
oh no... WE SUCK AGAIN!
oh no... WE SUCK AGAIN!
leswp1
New member
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
voters....
i heard the 'oh-ver-ray-ted' chant tonight and i had to think, "is that directed at our team? we can't be 'rated', can we?" then i get home and see an email letting me know i can watch the #17 Terriers take on MC tomorrow night
voters....
i heard the 'oh-ver-ray-ted' chant tonight and i had to think, "is that directed at our team? we can't be 'rated', can we?" then i get home and see an email letting me know i can watch the #17 Terriers take on MC tomorrow night
massattack49
Registered User
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
BU sucks... you lose a couple players and it looks like Ben Blood
BU sucks... you lose a couple players and it looks like Ben Blood
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
What is your obsession with Ben Blood? You posted pretty much the same post in at least 4 threads.
BU sucks... you lose a couple players and it looks like Ben Blood
What is your obsession with Ben Blood? You posted pretty much the same post in at least 4 threads.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
this is an extremely well thought out and well articulated post. thank you for your input.
BU sucks... you lose a couple players and it looks like Ben Blood
this is an extremely well thought out and well articulated post. thank you for your input.
Albertson Clover
New member
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
True only to a degree. If KM was 45-0-0 and had a save% of 1.000 last year Rollie would have been told to GTFO.
True only to a degree. If KM was 45-0-0 and had a save% of 1.000 last year Rollie would have been told to GTFO.
candycanes99
HAVE SOME CLASS
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
Nope, we would need to use Rollie since KM would get John Muse disease.
Nope, we would need to use Rollie since KM would get John Muse disease.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
Starts from the top. Consequences from JP being bailed out by phenomenal talent and a few "own" goals last year is that he will probably hang around for another 5 plus years of mediocrity (or worse).
Starts from the top. Consequences from JP being bailed out by phenomenal talent and a few "own" goals last year is that he will probably hang around for another 5 plus years of mediocrity (or worse).
HockeyMan2000
New member
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
You're a dope no matter what thread you post in. FRAUD!
Please continue polluting Merrimack threads instead of PC's -- we appreciate it though.
You're a dope no matter what thread you post in. FRAUD!
Please continue polluting Merrimack threads instead of PC's -- we appreciate it though.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
Good goalies steal games. last year BU won the champioship game in spite of the goalie. He is 2-6 and was pulled for a reason.
He is a good goalie but not close to Cannata who did exactly what he had to do in the first period to give his team a chance to win. BU's d did poorly because MC is a better team.
just like Cannata is a better goalie.
You're a dope no matter what thread you post in. FRAUD!
Please continue polluting Merrimack threads instead of PC's -- we appreciate it though.
Good goalies steal games. last year BU won the champioship game in spite of the goalie. He is 2-6 and was pulled for a reason.
He is a good goalie but not close to Cannata who did exactly what he had to do in the first period to give his team a chance to win. BU's d did poorly because MC is a better team.
just like Cannata is a better goalie.
Re: BU-Merrimack 11/13 and 11/14
5 year rule against complaining about the team after a championship.
Motivation has never been Parker's strong suit. Recall the numerous tournament games they failed to show up for and got blown out in over the years. With that in mind I guess we shouldn't be too surprised about how things have started off this year, but they are a better team than this.
5 year rule against complaining about the team after a championship.
Motivation has never been Parker's strong suit. Recall the numerous tournament games they failed to show up for and got blown out in over the years. With that in mind I guess we shouldn't be too surprised about how things have started off this year, but they are a better team than this.