Re: Brown University Bears 2011-12
If a coach has not been following the players at that tournament for several years already, that would be shocking. A new coach scrambling to get ready to start the season with a new staff not making it to one tournament, not so much. As for saying that missing the Stoney tourney is equivalent to missing the boat on an entire recruiting class, that's truly ridiculous.
You're completely missing the point. Does she know who's who? Wouldn't argue with that for the most part--although Jeff did do a lion's share of the scouting at major tourneys the last 2-3 years, while she had a young baby at home. So she's probably not got quite as strong a sense of the relative merits of various players as many other coaches with whom she is competing with for talent. That's a real problem for a school that needs to upgrade. Smart and efficient recruiting is imperative. And Stoney is the only venue that provides 80 quality teams all in one place (40 Midget, 40 Junior).
It must be remembered too that the recruiting process is also a two-way street. She may know how the more coveted recruits stack up, but to them she isn't really a well-known entity, even as an assistant (Jeff did more recruiting than most other HCs). She needs to increase her profile. As a school lower down on most good player's wish lists at the moment, Brown needs to work harder than most to attract higher quality recruits. Players in this year's grad class have generally got their options already narrowed to 3-5 at the most. Coaches use Stoney as an opportunity to get quality face time with a prospect and her parents to try to make a final pitch as she makes her decision between those. Not bothering to even attend while all other schools do so really makes a bad impression on those considering Brown--not just on the grad class, but on those players in the junior class now starting to form their list of target schools. With red flags already raised regarding Brown's commitment to hockey based on past events, this unfortunately raises yet another one despite what many felt was a more hopeful sign with the hiring of a new coach. How committed are they to truly becoming competitive?
Furthermore, every year there are many players that have flown under the radar prior to the fall of their senior year. Whether because they previously played Midget or U16 hockey, or played in a less scouted area or program, or simply have developed later than most, with a breakout weekend at Stoney there are always a great many that suddenly find their names rising significantly on the wish lists of various programs--even moreso now that the biggest fish have started to land.
With no Brown staff presence, they wouldn't know who these previously undervalued players are, and/or how far they've risen. And for a school currently having difficulty landing the most sought after recruits, identifying and landing more of those late bloomers and diamonds in the rough is especially critical. Brown could have had a stronger chance with those players now that some of their competition has finished their incoming class, but the window of opportunity is now extremely short.
Missing the most important tournament of the year is just not good optics or recruiting strategy for a program trying to right the ship and move ahead of some of their competition. Will they still beable to recruit? Of course. Will they get the prospects they'd like to have, or had a chance at given the right pitch at the right time? Highly unlikely.
And don't underestimate either the really poor optics of this decision on those already at Brown.
With the loss of Coady who was a big asset on the recruiting trail, on top of the decision to opt outof attending NAHA and Stoney, Brown has taken a really big step backward recruiting-wise. A really poor start to her tenure on several fronts that she will need to work hard to overcome.