Brown - Oops! They did it again.

[2 for chirping]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

It's from the Harry Potter movies - the actress who plays Hermione is a freshman at Brown..Hux referred to her a few pages back...

Is she a forward or a D??

 

[hcky85]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

As defacto council to 5 4 fighting i have advised him to refrain from responding to comments from posters who do not know the term "insinuating" from "insulating" and to save his diatribes for those individuals who either understand ( or at least respect) his vast knowledge of all things hockey.
In the future 5 4 fighting will weigh in only on matters which are worthy of his opinion and subsequent influence.
Should you wish to have a private session with the Dalai La... er sorry 5 4 please message him and you will be granted an audience in due time.

Respectfully
2 For Chirping.

Honest mistake, didn’t realize the automatic spelling corrections in word changed my misspelling of insinuating to insulating.

But, everyone keeps trashing the idea of a disgruntled 4th liner or an ex-player being cut having an opinion on how good a coach is. I’m just asking, if that’s what he’s saying.

 

[IceIsNice]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is she a forward or a D??

Couldn't she be a goalie?

 

[hcky85]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

We need Hermione Granger (fictional character = not to be confused with a current freshman at Brown named in this thread associated with Quidditch) and her magic wand to fix this thread

Is the peanut gallery only capable of calling out spelling errors and providing unrelated material that has nothing to do with what people are discussing here or hockey in general?

 

[2 for chirping]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is the peanut gallery only capable of calling out spelling errors and providing unrelated material that has nothing to do with what people are discussing here or hockey in general?

Yup i guess thats pretty much all we're good for.

Check out time !!

G'Nite

 

[Mr. Kitty]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

As defacto council to 5 4 fighting...BobLobLaw...
In the future 5 4 fighting will weigh in only on matters which are worthy of his opinion and subsequent influence.

Geez, I hate it when Hcky85 is right -- I got nothing, but it's a long way to the weekend and the next games.

2-4 -- change "council" to "counsel" and "influence" to "flatulence" thks
and I'll shut up

 

[2 for chirping]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Geez, I hate it when Hcky85 is right -- I got nothing, but it's a long way to the weekend and the next games.

2-4 -- change "council" to "counsel" and "influence" to "flatulence" thks
and I'll shut up

Now that is funny !! Even from a kitty kat.

 

[Trillium]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is she a forward or a D??

I think she might be a coach....or perhaps she just plays one on TV

 

[notfromaroundhere]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

I think she might be a coach....or perhaps she just plays one on TV

And I heard she stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night...

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Hey dipstick, I was being sarcastic, and made reference to her because she plays hockey on the field, not the ice.

Don'y ya just hate it when some days your like flypaper for arseholes?

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Is the peanut gallery only capable of calling out spelling errors and providing unrelated material that has nothing to do with what people are discussing here or hockey in general?

85er if you want to talk hockey in general, I for one, am down with that. As I stated to you in a previous post I honestly think you have plenty to contribute to all things hockey...if you choose to do so.

I may speak for many when I say to you that "what people are discussing here" is percieved by some as nothing more than a public lynching. The hockey traditionalists don't care for it, regardless of who's right or wrong.

That's why your getting the pushback you and your posse are seeing. I wouldn't know Digit Murphy from Murphy Brown nor my "Dad" from Wild Bill Coady but I do know right from wrong and whatever your trying to accomplish here by publicly stoning these particular coaches is well... just plain wrong.

Most here don't want to have you take any of this personaly...but many can't for the life of them, figure out why you want to settle this issue so publicly.

History should tell you this type of approach is doomed to fail.

There has to be another way to air your concerns, has to be...

 

[2 for chirping]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

85er if you want to talk hockey in general, I for one, am down with that. As I stated to you in a previous post I honestly think you have plenty to contribute to all things hockey...if you choose to do so.

I may speak for many when I say to you that "what people are discussing here" is percieved by some as nothing more than a public lynching. The hockey traditionalists don't care for it, regardless of who's right or wrong.

That's why your getting the pushback you and your posse are seeing. I wouldn't know Digit Murphy from Murphy Brown nor my "Dad" from Wild Bill Coady but I do know right from wrong and whatever your trying to accomplish here by publicly stoning these particular coaches is well... just plain wrong.

Most here don't want to have you take any of this personaly...but many can't for the life of them, figure out why you want to settle this issue so publicly.

History should tell you this type of approach is doomed to fail.

There has to be another way to air your concerns, has to be...

Well it would appear though despite my best attempts to place the fiver on the self proclaimed Injured Reserve list he has come off the bench to once again claim his post as Grand EveryThing of Hockey.
Welcome back to your rightful post of overseer of the hockey minions.
Now can we all move away from this Brown thread and let it slowly sink itself into page 2 , then 3, then 4 then.......

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Well it would appear though despite my best attempts to place the fiver on the self proclaimed Injured Reserve list he has come off the bench to once again claim his post as Grand EveryThing of Hockey.
Welcome back to your rightful post of overseer of the hockey minions.
Now can we all move away from this Brown thread and let it slowly sink itself into page 2 , then 3, then 4 then.......

I had to take a little time off for rehab today. That 5 on 3... I defended all day Sunday on this thread left me with a slight groin pull.

 

[hcky85]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

I may speak for many when I say to you that "what people are discussing here" is percieved by some as nothing more than a public lynching. The hockey traditionalists don't care for it, regardless of who's right or wrong.


Most here don't want to have you take any of this personaly...but many can't for the life of them, figure out why you want to settle this issue so publicly.

History should tell you this type of approach is doomed to fail.

There has to be another way to air your concerns, has to be...

I understand that as well. I might not be a traditionalist when it comes to handling hockey affairs, but I do consider myself to be a traditionalist when it comes to basic morals.

From early on this forum showed the extent to how far certain tainted personas were being applied to certain individuals. I could try to ignore the fact that she’s let the program fall drastically, but I can’t ignore that she finds the need to trash the reputations of players who have quit or been cut in order to justify decisions made.

She doesn’t owe anyone an explanation for why players are no longer on the team. All she has to say is hey it’s my team, but she didn’t. She has gone and publicly spoken only about personal matters of past players without anything remotely hockey related being mentioned.

She lacks any understanding of common decency and has never been forced into taking responsibility for her actions. So if she would like to show a lack of respect for past players and assistant coaches then I have no problem coming onto a website and pointing that out to a community that she thought would never hear anyone else’s perspective but her own.

I agree, there is no need for any of this to be publicly known. But I’m not the person who’s responsible for doing so.

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

I understand that as well. I might not be a traditionalist when it comes to handling hockey affairs, but I do consider myself to be a traditionalist when it comes to basic morals.

From early on this forum showed the extent to how far certain tainted personas were being applied to certain individuals. I could try to ignore the fact that she’s let the program fall drastically, but I can’t ignore that she finds the need to trash the reputations of players who have quit or been cut in order to justify decisions made.

She doesn’t owe anyone an explanation for why players are no longer on the team. All she has to say is hey it’s my team, but she didn’t. She has gone and publicly spoken only about personal matters of past players without anything remotely hockey related being mentioned.

She lacks any understanding of common decency and has never been forced into taking responsibility for her actions. So if she would like to show a lack of respect for past players and assistant coaches then I have no problem coming onto a website and pointing that out to a community that she thought would never hear anyone else’s perspective but her own.

I agree, there is no need for any of this to be publicly known. But I’m not the person who’s responsible for doing so.

I ask you this...Did Digit Murphy come on to this forum and publicly trash any former players and or their families?

 

[hcky85]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

I ask you this...Did Digit Murphy come on to this forum and publicly trash any former players and or their families?

No because she does so in person with no remorse.

Just read the early threads to see the perceptions people had been given.

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

No because she does so in person with no remorse.

Just read the early threads to see the perceptions people had been given.

Then it's not on public record in this forum.

I don't care about perception and even if I did ...that's a stretch.

Can we assume you were one of the individuals that she publicly trashed in order to justify decisions made?

 

[hcky85]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

Then it's not on public record in this forum.

I don't care about perception and even if I did ...that's a stretch.

Can we assume you were one of the individuals that she publicly trashed in order to justify decisions made?

You can assume what you would like.

I just have no problem going to bat for the people who don’t have the time to defend rumors that should never have been started.

And there are different means to addressing something publicly. I chose this because it was already being discussed here. That does not prove Digit didn't choose a different means.

 

[fan007]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

That's why your getting the pushback you and your posse are seeing. I wouldn't know Digit Murphy from Murphy Brown nor my "Dad" from Wild Bill Coady but I do know right from wrong and whatever your trying to accomplish here by publicly stoning these particular coaches is well... just plain wrong.

If this is a correct statement, then why would you be so vigilant in defense of these people you allegedly don't know? You've got nearly 40 posts on these threads - all in defense of someone you don't know? I don't think so! You've preached like you've got too much stake in the outcome of this debate.
You say you know people on Brown's team, try this: Type in their first name, then underscore, then last name @brown.edu. Email them and ask them what's been going on. Maybe then you'll get a sense of the injustices that have been revealed on this thread. And maybe then Stephen King can write his best-selling horror story. Sad, really, when you know that these girls have run out time to play hockey. It's been said before, these players have no where else to go.

 

[5 4 Fighting]

Re: Brown - Oops! They did it again.

If this is a correct statement, then why would you be so vigilant in defense of these people you allegedly don't know? You've got nearly 40 posts on these threads - all in defense of someone you don't know? I don't think so! You've preached like you've got too much stake in the outcome of this debate.
You say you know people on Brown's team, try this: Type in their first name, then underscore, then last name @brown.edu. Email them and ask them what's been going on. Maybe then you'll get a sense of the injustices that have been revealed on this thread. And maybe then Stephen King can write his best-selling horror story. Sad, really, when you know that these girls have run out time to play hockey. It's been said before, these players have no where else to go.

I wasn't talking to you. So shut your cakehole.