Re: Boston University Part IV: Off-Season or New Season?
No. 2009 was as good or arguably better than any of the other BU NC teams I saw. And I saw all 5 from 1971. The argument I've been making since Monday has been only about the coaching and Parker. I have not seen him win an NCAA game he was not favored to win since Michigan in 1997.
The other trademark of Jack Kelly and Jack Parker teams (until the last 10-12 years) is that they would put it into another gear from Beanpot through the playoffs and NCAAs. How many times have we seen that of late? That is now BC's trademark. I would argue that is coaching and how the team is mentally prepared for Feb/Mar.
I have resigned myself to the fact that Parker won't step down and the admin will let him coach as long as he wants. But as long as he is "Da Man", I will expect more "results" like the 3 of the past 4 years, not 2009.
So, this is what it's come to? Downplaying the achievements of a team that won every honor they could have won? Two years after the fact?
Sheesh!
No. 2009 was as good or arguably better than any of the other BU NC teams I saw. And I saw all 5 from 1971. The argument I've been making since Monday has been only about the coaching and Parker. I have not seen him win an NCAA game he was not favored to win since Michigan in 1997.
The other trademark of Jack Kelly and Jack Parker teams (until the last 10-12 years) is that they would put it into another gear from Beanpot through the playoffs and NCAAs. How many times have we seen that of late? That is now BC's trademark. I would argue that is coaching and how the team is mentally prepared for Feb/Mar.
I have resigned myself to the fact that Parker won't step down and the admin will let him coach as long as he wants. But as long as he is "Da Man", I will expect more "results" like the 3 of the past 4 years, not 2009.