What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've never studied law for one second, but if he did that wouldn't his behavior that didn't rise to the actionable level, but were unsavory nonethleless, be brought to light during the trial?

It sure would. If he did anything even remotely immoral then you will never see a law suit.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

A dismissal is not an acquital. Nicastro was not found innocent. All you fanboys know he did something otherwise he would not have been charged. You don't just make up a rape accusation.

You just can't make up biased ignorance, either.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

You just can't make up biased ignorance, either.

Amen

(on the off chance someone could misinterpret my one word due to my being a BC fan - those that assume him guilty because he now doesn't have the opportunity to prove his innocence make me very angry)
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

He wasn't found not guilty and the victim didnt come out and say she made it up. If he brought civil charges against her, the entire story would come out in public. Obviously he isn't a choir boy or BU wouldn't have kicked him out of school. He needs to move away from this and thank God he didnt end up in prison.

From what I understand BU did not kick him out of school, he withdrew.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

I've never studied law for one second, but if he did that wouldn't his behavior that didn't rise to the actionable level, but were unsavory nonethleless, be brought to light during the trial?

Thankfully, I also am not a lawyer, and would be one of the last people on earth to wish BU well in anything (especially hockey). But I do have something more than a passing knowledge of criminal justice principles, rules of evidence, etc., so allow me to throw a few observations into the mix.

--DAs are absolutely loath to drop felony charges once they are brought, especially in cases that have achieved a degree of noteriety. It makes them look stupid.
--In this day and age, prosecutors have vast arrays of forensic evidence-gathering tools that didn't exist until recently. I won't get into the details except to say that there are plenty of medical and lab tests that can substantiate whether or not a rape occurred. I'm assuming those kinds of tests were administered.
--There was plenty of FB chatter about this involving friends and acquaintainces of both parties. Some of that chatter might (emphasize might)have given investigators some insights into exactly what happened. You can bet that the DAs people looked at all of that.
--The victim simply may have decided not to testify.

Beyond that, however, I am chagrined to note that we as a people apparently learned nothing from the Duke Lacrosse fiasco, where the players were tried, convicted, tarred, feathered, and executed in the national media, treated like pariahs by the supposedly enlightened Duke student body, and summarily disowned by the always politically correct university administrators.

Now I'm not trying to make Max Nicastro out to be a choir boy or suggest that the young lady made the story up, but I am going to suggest that this kid was demonized in the same way by the same constituencies that rushed to judgment in Durham not so many years ago. This kind of behavior by supposedly enlightened elites is beyond arrogant and of continuing concern to those of us who still believe in the assumption of innocence until guilt is proven.

As previous posters have stated, we will probably never know what really happened. But if it turns out that the accusation was fabricated, then I wouldn't be surprised to see Nicastro try to clear his name and recover damages through civil process since--rightly or wrongly--his name and reputation are forever tarnished.
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

the Duke Lacrosse fiasco, where the players were tried, convicted, tarred, feathered, and executed BY CERTAIN FACTIONS OF the national media who thought first about 'politics' rather than 'truth.'

It needs to be pointed out that certain media entities did this and others did not.
 
I honestly don't recall any media outlets playing the 'innocent until proven guilty' angle on the Duke case until the story had begun to unravel.

There must have been someone somewhere, but they were definitely in the minority. Those players were all fully convicted in the media until the obvious evidence proving their innocence started going public.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

There must have been someone somewhere, but they were definitely in the minority. Those players were all fully convicted in the media until the obvious evidence proving their innocence started going public.

here's a guy with an identity crisis.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Can somebody correct me if I incorrectly speculate on next year's non-conf schedule:
2 beanpot
2 @ north dak.
1 rpi
1 some college in canada
1 usa u-18
1 holy cross or harvard
Just trying to figure out things based on what I think I've heard. Stanley Cup playoffs aren't even over and I'm already jonesing for hockey.
Enjoy you summer everyone!
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Can somebody correct me if I incorrectly speculate on next year's non-conf schedule:
2 beanpot
2 @ north dak.
1 rpi
1 some college in canada
1 usa u-18
1 holy cross or harvard
Just trying to figure out things based on what I think I've heard. Stanley Cup playoffs aren't even over and I'm already jonesing for hockey.
Enjoy you summer everyone!

+1 at DU on 12/29
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

I think we've found who should do the ceremonial puck drop in October:

Miss USA 2012 - Boston University student Olivia Culpp

Not to be a d1ck but if that's the best the US has to offer it's no wonder we're falling behind

145702251012524--525x415.jpg
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Wow. Why am I not surprised a BC fan would post a comment like that. :rolleyes:
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Can somebody correct me if I incorrectly speculate on next year's non-conf schedule:
2 beanpot
2 @ north dak.
1 rpi
1 some college in canada
1 usa u-18
1 holy cross or harvard
Just trying to figure out things based on what I think I've heard. Stanley Cup playoffs aren't even over and I'm already jonesing for hockey.
Enjoy you summer everyone!

As bonanza mentioned there is Denver, and I believe the only remaining question is the Holy Cross or Harvard (or something else). I think everything but that is confirmed.
 
Re: Boston University 2011-2012: Part The Sixth

Thankfully, I also am not a lawyer, and would be one of the last people on earth to wish BU well in anything (especially hockey). But I do have something more than a passing knowledge of criminal justice principles, rules of evidence, etc., so allow me to throw a few observations into the mix.

--DAs are absolutely loath to drop felony charges once they are brought, especially in cases that have achieved a degree of noteriety. It makes them look stupid.
--In this day and age, prosecutors have vast arrays of forensic evidence-gathering tools that didn't exist until recently. I won't get into the details except to say that there are plenty of medical and lab tests that can substantiate whether or not a rape occurred. I'm assuming those kinds of tests were administered.
--There was plenty of FB chatter about this involving friends and acquaintainces of both parties. Some of that chatter might (emphasize might)have given investigators some insights into exactly what happened. You can bet that the DAs people looked at all of that.
--The victim simply may have decided not to testify.

Beyond that, however, I am chagrined to note that we as a people apparently learned nothing from the Duke Lacrosse fiasco, where the players were tried, convicted, tarred, feathered, and executed in the national media, treated like pariahs by the supposedly enlightened Duke student body, and summarily disowned by the always politically correct university administrators.

Now I'm not trying to make Max Nicastro out to be a choir boy or suggest that the young lady made the story up, but I am going to suggest that this kid was demonized in the same way by the same constituencies that rushed to judgment in Durham not so many years ago. This kind of behavior by supposedly enlightened elites is beyond arrogant and of continuing concern to those of us who still believe in the assumption of innocence until guilt is proven.

As previous posters have stated, we will probably never know what really happened. But if it turns out that the accusation was fabricated, then I wouldn't be surprised to see Nicastro try to clear his name and recover damages through civil process since--rightly or wrongly--his name and reputation are forever tarnished.

The victim probably did not want to face prosecuting attorney's attacking her morality. They would be absolutely brutal on her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top