Re: Boston University 2010 Offseason I - The Year after the Year after effect
Holy crap is THIS awesome. +1
Holy crap is THIS awesome. +1
Hokydad, are you really saying that it is ok for a non-relative to give a substantial gift to a college athlete? What planet are you from?
In this case I am not going to. I am going to keep it and will pass on after he graduates
But 100% fact says you can. If someone is a long time friend of the family and wants to give a kid a gift, he can. What do you think, the NCAA hides under the couch at Christmas and checks to make sure all gifts are from relatives?
What do you think, the NCAA hides under the couch at Christmas and checks to make sure all gifts are from relatives?
In this case I am not going to. I am going to keep it and will pass on after he graduates
But 100% fact says you can. If someone is a long time friend of the family and wants to give a kid a gift, he can. What do you think, the NCAA hides under the couch at Christmas and checks to make sure all gifts are from relatives?
In this case I am not going to. I am going to keep it and will pass on after he graduates
But 100% fact says you can. If someone is a long time friend of the family and wants to give a kid a gift, he can. What do you think, the NCAA hides under the couch at Christmas and checks to make sure all gifts are from relatives?
Boy, you are a college hockey coaches' "dream". A random fan who gives expensive gifts to their players. Can you do the same to a Cornell player? May as well put them on probation, too.
The bigger question for me anyways is why the hell would you? What is wrong with you exactly? You are a spooky fella.
You may not accept gifts, money, transportation, loans or special benefits from anyone(coaches, staff, faculty, fans, mentors, or boosters) because of your status as an athlete. This rule also applies to your family and friends.
you guys are reading the rules 100% wrong
it reverts back to stuff provided because you are an athlete.
if you realy believe that a longtime friend of a family cant give a gift to a kid, your a moron
Extra Benefits (for currently enrolled student-athletes)
You may not accept gifts, money, transportation, loans or special benefits from anyone (coaches, staff, faculty, fans, mentors, or boosters) because of your status as an athlete. This rule also applies to your family and friends.
The NCAA defines an extra benefit as any special arrangement to provide a student-athlete or his/her relatives or friends with something that is not provided in general to the student body. Someone whom you are not naturally or legally dependent cannot provide you with anything for free or at a reduced rate because you are a student athlete.
Extra benefits include, but are not limited to:
A special discount, payment arrangement, or credit on purchase (e.g. airline ticket, clothing) or services (e.g. laundry, auto repair, attorney fees).
A loan of money or guarantee of bond at a special rate.
Use of an automobile that belongs to a coach, staff member, booster, etc.
Free or discount meals or services at a commercial establishment.
Benefits connected with off-campus housing (e.g. use of TV sets, room furnishings, etc.)
Signing or co-signing of a loan by a coach, booster etc.
Use of personal property that belongs to a coach, booster, etc.(e.g. car, stereo, home, etc.)
Even if you are a longtime family friend of the Warsofskys... note the bolded sections.
Feedback I got from this genius moments ago:
"maybe because i have known the family for many years, talk to dad about twice a week and coached the kid for 8 years, also coached his older brothers"
Wouldn't this count as "family and friends"? I half expect this guy to say "just kidding" or "April Fools!" because no one can be this dumb.
Yes, the bold section... All that says is that family and friends can not take gifts from college reps or boosters as well. No kidding
and family friend can give a gift to a kid anytime they want
you are reading it wrong
"You may not accept gifts...from anyone (coaches, staff, faculty, fans, mentors, or boosters) because of your status as an athlete. This rule also applies to your family and friends."
Did it ever occur to you that you are completely wrong? I mean, YOU posted this quote. What part of "you cannot accept gifts from anyone" are you missing? Im out, talking to you is like talking to a shoe.
Hokydad, would it not surprise you if David already has a game jersey from the gold medal game? I recall the winter classic a few years ago when the pens wore three jerseys, one each period. One was to be auctions off the raise money for charity (like this maybe?) one went to the team to do wiu as they pleased, and one was kept by te player as a keepsake.
And why would you donate it to BU?
Crazy night y'all....
Ditto, total wste of time talking to someone who thought the friends and family clause meant that....
Why do you insist upon taking a sentence and cherry picking a portion of it?
It says specifically BECAUSE OF YOUR STATUS AS AN ATHLETE!!!!
A FAMILY FRIEND WOULDNT DO IT BECAUSE HE WAS AN ATHLETE!!!
The jersey will be donated to BU, if they want it for their collection... that solves your issue there.
So if Warsofsky was NOT a student athlete, you'd still spend $1,200 to give him a hockey jersey?
BUFan, no, he's wrong. A collectible jersey does not count as 'equipment', especially since he won't be wearing that jersey again in a game. He thinks he's correct but he's interpreting the rule wrong. The only reason he's giving him the jersey is because he's an athlete. If he had a brain, he'd buy the jersey for Warsofsky's father, but why confuse this guy with logic?
Ughhh ... no. You obviously don't know the rules. He can give it to him only because Warsofsky is an athlete, if he has a long-standing gift-giving relationship dating back to before Warsofsky was an athlete.
But we can enter your world, where that rule doesn't exist. Fine. But the rule that says you (a person unfamiliar to the player who does not have a long-standing, gift-giving relationship to the player) can not give a gift to an athlete or his family members solely because he is an athlete still exists, right? So ... if hockydad had a brain and used logic ... I guess he WOULDN'T give it to Warsofsky's father?
Whether or not a used jersey is equipment is really irrelevant, but I'm going to go ahead and not trust your analysis. Is a shoulder pad no longer equipment if it sits in a player's locker rather than being worn in a game?