jcarter7669
Registered User
Re: Boston College Hockey, Part II
I proposed a point, I was wrong and stated that.
I do doubt that the numbers are provide are up to date as the applicants numbers are 40% of what the UVM website provides. This increase has been dramatic as Fogel has done this intentionally to restore the schools image to what it was 20 years ago....a public ivy.
If you do not have an idea of the numbers then look at the link I provide. That is readily information and is only a click away. Your assertion that UVM has low standards just isn't true anymore. It was, I won't argue that, but its not the same anymore.
The bottom line is you are behind the times, don't read the posts, and do not bother to check and verify others assertions. I corrected myself and admitted the mistake which you would know if you read the posts. The statistics were provided by the link I posted which you are too lazy to read. If you want to continue to harp on it then by all means go ahead.....you are only showing your true ignorance.
You proposed a point, were proven wrong, and now you are doubting those numbers? I didn't make up those numbers on that link, clearly you made up your numbers previous to that.
Regardless, I have no idea what the actual numbers are regarding UVM's student population and whether or not the student body number you provided includes graduate or evening college students, etc. Let's be honest, a monkey could get into UVM. To say otherwise is foolish.
The bottom line is the 10% number you list is more likely the percentage UVM has of NOT being blown out by Boston College on Friday.
I proposed a point, I was wrong and stated that.
I do doubt that the numbers are provide are up to date as the applicants numbers are 40% of what the UVM website provides. This increase has been dramatic as Fogel has done this intentionally to restore the schools image to what it was 20 years ago....a public ivy.
If you do not have an idea of the numbers then look at the link I provide. That is readily information and is only a click away. Your assertion that UVM has low standards just isn't true anymore. It was, I won't argue that, but its not the same anymore.
The bottom line is you are behind the times, don't read the posts, and do not bother to check and verify others assertions. I corrected myself and admitted the mistake which you would know if you read the posts. The statistics were provided by the link I posted which you are too lazy to read. If you want to continue to harp on it then by all means go ahead.....you are only showing your true ignorance.