What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Status
Not open for further replies.
French Rage said:
I'm seeing "Mail Ballots Outstanding: 29,103,321"
Click to expand...

I see that too. But if you select the outstanding mail ballots button farther down it shows the 20.9 million figure dx mentioned. I feel like I’m interpreting something incorrectly.

Edit: Just noticed fewer states report that figure.
 
Last edited:
MinnesotaNorthStar said:
Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson finally admit which side they are on...

https://twitter.com/HartHanson/status/1323454793864470531

Also, Tarrant County's numbers may not be counted by the end of tomorrow night they had a printing issue surrounding a barcode which caused thousands of absentee ballots to get rejected. They are now going through to correct these errors so those votes get counted.
Click to expand...

Ob1cBE4A_400x400.jpg
 
I think it would be fun to get together with a million other people tomorrow night at the People’s House to sing “hey hey hey ... goodbye.” You think they could hear it from the bunker? Pipe it in through Fox maybe?
 
I can’t picture Dump giving a normal concession speech. I’m kind of wondering if this will end in suicide, massive tantrum sabotage of the federal government (what parts haven’t already occurred), or just empty Twitter bloviating about lawsuits against his enemies list and promises to run again in four years (he floated this last one today)
 
geezer said:
I can’t picture Dump giving a normal concession speech. I’m kind of wondering if this will end in suicide, massive tantrum sabotage of the federal government (what parts haven’t already occurred), or just empty Twitter bloviating about lawsuits against his enemies list and promises to run again in four years (he floated this last one today)
Click to expand...

I’d settle for AG Klobuchar putting him in shackles
 
dxmnkd316 said:
5th circuit tells GOP to **** off
Click to expand...

https://twitter.com/SSanchezTV/status/1323502022918897669

The 5th Circuit has denied a request to ban drive-thru voting in Harris County, Texas.
Click to expand...

Also:

Supreme Court Sides With McKesson FOR NOW

The justices, in an unsigned order, wrote that a federal appeals court should have obtained guidance from a Louisiana state court before allowing the officer’s lawsuit to move forward, and sent the case back to be reconsidered.

The decision appeared to be 7-1, with Justice Clarence Thomas the only noted dissent. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was sworn in a week ago, did not participate in the case.

The decision came just one day before the election between President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, in which protests of state violence against Black people have been a recurrent theme.
Click to expand...

One officer, who is unnamed in the lawsuit, was hit by a piece of concrete or rock allegedly thrown by a protester and injured while police sought to clear the highway. While the person who threw the object wasn’t identified, the officer sued McKesson on the theory that his alleged organization of the protest made him liable for damages.

A federal district court rejected the officer’s claim but a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision and allowed it to proceed on the basis that “a violent confrontation with a police officer was a foreseeable effect of negligently directing a protest” onto the road.

The Supreme Court reversed the appeals court ruling but left open the possibility that the police officer could ultimately win the case.

Because of the case’s “novel issues of state law,” the justices wrote that the federal appeals court should have first consulted with the Louisiana Supreme Court.

“The Louisiana Supreme Court, to be sure, may announce the same duty as the Fifth Circuit,” the justices wrote. But, the justices added, the 5th Circuit should not have “ventured into so uncertain an area” of law that was “laden with value judgments and fraught with implications for First Amendment rights” without first obtaining guidance on Louisiana law from the Louisiana Supreme Court.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top