Re: Batman Vs Superman, And Oh Yeah, Suicide Squad: Movies Thread
In what specific ways should ratings be handled differently I.e. how is the current method not working? I honestly have never paid attention so have zero frame of reference.
From a developmental psychology perspective, there are two really serious problems with the ratings today:
-- sadistic violence is severely underrated.
-- the entire ratings system is suffering from what you might call "grade inflation"
From a different thread:
A Clockwork Orange is perhaps the most disturbing and yet enthralling movies I've ever seen.
Those kinds of movies really should have a rating of something like "NYA-21"; they can have a profoundly troubling effect on the adolescent mind. Yet our bizarre rating system basically rates a movie "NC-17" for explicit sexual content and for nothing else.
A sensible, helpful rating system would be based on the typical emotional maturity of children of various ages in the developmental cycle, their ability to handle not only explicit sexual content but sadistically violent content as well. Blowing stuff up is one thing, the scene in the original
Robocop where the bad guy uses a shotgun to blow off Murphy's arms and legs one joint at a time is another.
G, PG 13, PG 15, NC-17, NYA-21 would be an example of a system that would be more in line with developmental stages, and the ratings categories could be simplified to a set of more objective standards.
Another option would be to adopt some of what they do on TV, where they have a multi-category rating based on language, violence, and explicit sexual content, so that you would have ratings expressed in three categories.
L15/V17/S17 for example.
This is the official website of the organization that actually rates films, and it explains the ratings categories in more detail:
http://filmratings.com/what.html
From a Q&A on
the MPAA website:
FILM RATING
Do I have to have my film rated in the United States?
The rating system in the United States is a voluntary system.