Re: Atlantic Hockey Adds to Scholarship Limit, Mulls Expansion
Perhaps you need to re-read my statement. I am aware of the lack of profits in most D1 sports which is why I never mentioned anything about creating a profit. I was talking about creating some sort of revenue stream that could offset those minimum costs that it takes to run the program. I would think that the difference between 150 per game and 1150 per game would mean about $150-200K in revenue. Perhaps that would be nothing more than an offset against increased costs but playing in front of even that many fans would, I think, be a morale boost to those student athletes ... not to mention increasing the prestige of the AHA as a conference (note: I have heard plenty of comments from players and their parents about some of the AHA "dumps").
Apparently, all ADs agree that the incremental costs of improving the program by making it more competitive on the ice, with real fans (and I am not saying it needs to be of the magnitude of a UW, UM, etc.) and a real arena is beyond their respective capabilities. I was not aware of this unanimity among AD's approach toward growing programs and making improvements so appreciate the update.
Perhaps you need to re-read my statement. I am aware of the lack of profits in most D1 sports which is why I never mentioned anything about creating a profit. I was talking about creating some sort of revenue stream that could offset those minimum costs that it takes to run the program. I would think that the difference between 150 per game and 1150 per game would mean about $150-200K in revenue. Perhaps that would be nothing more than an offset against increased costs but playing in front of even that many fans would, I think, be a morale boost to those student athletes ... not to mention increasing the prestige of the AHA as a conference (note: I have heard plenty of comments from players and their parents about some of the AHA "dumps").
Apparently, all ADs agree that the incremental costs of improving the program by making it more competitive on the ice, with real fans (and I am not saying it needs to be of the magnitude of a UW, UM, etc.) and a real arena is beyond their respective capabilities. I was not aware of this unanimity among AD's approach toward growing programs and making improvements so appreciate the update.
Throwing the least amount of money they can at a program is "trying" - trying to keep it alive, but that is it. And you are wrong about every school increasing their scholie support ... when Niagara entered AHA, to comply with conference rules, they had to decrease their scholarship support, going down from 17-18 to 12. So, unfortunately, this was detrimental to "trying to provide an opportunity for their student athletes."To answer your final point; the fact that these schools decided to spend any money at all, and not simply fold their programs, is evidence that they are trying. In fact, every single AHA program (that offers scholarships) has increased their scholarship support since the league was created. Trying to provide an opportunity for their student atheltes to compete on the ice is evidenece of "trying". Maybe not to the degree that makes you happy, but it is an effort.
True enough, they are no longer trying ... but they did try for awhile by putting in minimal effort and dollars. To me, that is the proof of what eventually happens to schools that take that approach.Fairfield, Iona, Wayne State...those schools are not even trying.