Here's the difference between you and I.....I am a hockey fan, not just some regional supporter stuck in a provincial mindset like yourself. I want to see registration numbers rise world wide....the more players playing, the better the game will be every where!
How do you know what the absolute numbers playing hockey are? Do you presume to think that all Canadian players are registered with Hockey Canada....perhaps a sizable number are not? You and I can both make guesses, but that's just what they are.....opinions based on what we want to believe but may not be so....the evidence suggest something different, though....registrations are declining and participation in the game is stagnant at best.
I wish it were so that youth hockey was not declining, in both Canada and the U.S. (and my guess is Europe as well). We will just have to wait and see if this decline can be arrested or not.....hopefully it can....
Still waiting for that supposed "proof" on the number of states that left USA Hockey.
I know they aren't absolute numbers because I know for a fact Minnesota doesn't register their high school players, I was told in a meeting that some other states have stopped registering their Mites, and we are currently discussing not registering our Mites or Squirts.
And again, because you felt so compelled to jump into this discussion in the defense of Hockey Canada, even if you are right (which you are not), and the numbers you posted from USA Hockey are a complete representation of all youth players in the USA (which it is not), you're still left with one problem.
It means little in the context of the discussion we are having. Hockey Canada's youth enrollments are projected (by Hockey Canada) to decline over 30% by 2020. Find me a source from USA Hockey that estimates our numbers will fall that much.
And I just love the fact that you're trying to throw provincial accusations back in my face. It's your default insult when you have nothing of consequence to say.
I enjoy all hockey, but I am here to talk about NCAA Hockey
BECAUSE IT IS A NCAA HOCKEY BOARD. You act like I was the one who went to a CHL board and started telling Canadians that their WJC team would be better with an NCAA coach and more NCAA players. Wrong pal, it was the other way around.
And when I asked him to support his statement that the UNITED STATES would be better off at the WJC with a CHL coach and more CHL players, he couldn't produce ONE IOTA of evidence to support his argument.
All he did was start bashing USA Hockey and talk about how much better Hockey Canada is. Who was being provincial?
I then pointed out that his wonderful Hockey Canada is expecting a MASSIVE decline in youth numbers over the next 10 years and you came running to Hockey Canada's defense. However, as I pointed out, your argument is moot for two reasons.
1. The USA Hockey numbers you provided aren't a complete picture of youth hockey in the USA.
2. More importantly, even if they were, they come NOWHERE NEAR the decline Hockey Canada is predicting.
You bring up a good point about Hockey Canada's numbers not being complete either. That very well could be the case. In fact, I would bet it is.
However, 200,000 players? Don't get me wrong, I don't WANT to see Hockey Canada's youth numbers decline. I'm with you. The more players playing, regardless of where, the better. I just didn't appreciate him coming here and essentially telling us USA Hockey and the NCAA sucks.