Re: At least seven killed at Fort Hood
I'm neither in nor out of "power," you obviously have a different view. Congratulations, I hope you use it wisely. I've made no reference here or elsewhere or ever about any kind of conspiracy, great or small. Truth is, I've not criticized Dear Leader on a variety of subjects, but what's the difference?
I may be in Fantasyland, but in your world, evidently, Barack Obama is above criticism on any subject, by anybody, ever. And any violation of that dictum is "unreal."
You're in high dudgeon, slinging around your typical non sequitors, acting like the judge in a high school debate and always, always, changing the subject.
I'm sorry I'm too "stupid" and probably "smug" to see the artistic nuance of your argument, which, come to find out is self-criticism. Do tell. And that "you're making my argument for me" gambit is getting old, too. Why not just climb down off the cross and explain it to us mortals simply and directly?
Not at all, I'm not the one out of power.
When you get to the point of deconstructing every nuance, pause and expression to find further proof of The Great Conspiracy, you're into fantasyland. The guy's not going to do or say anything that you won't find some way to fault. We all do it, fine, but don't pretend it's real.
And that reference to Bush? It was to admit I do the same thing -- in fact exactly the opposite of what you took it for (an attack on you). So you proved the point far better than anything else I can write.
I'm neither in nor out of "power," you obviously have a different view. Congratulations, I hope you use it wisely. I've made no reference here or elsewhere or ever about any kind of conspiracy, great or small. Truth is, I've not criticized Dear Leader on a variety of subjects, but what's the difference?
I may be in Fantasyland, but in your world, evidently, Barack Obama is above criticism on any subject, by anybody, ever. And any violation of that dictum is "unreal."
You're in high dudgeon, slinging around your typical non sequitors, acting like the judge in a high school debate and always, always, changing the subject.
I'm sorry I'm too "stupid" and probably "smug" to see the artistic nuance of your argument, which, come to find out is self-criticism. Do tell. And that "you're making my argument for me" gambit is getting old, too. Why not just climb down off the cross and explain it to us mortals simply and directly?
Last edited: