sorry! I was being flip. forgot to
it is strange though - those who hear about so much suffering cause more of that suffering themselves.
oh no! please! the pre-PTSD was a joke. lame. I know. sorry!!!!
...you can suffer from PTSD prior to experiencing traumatic stress.
Marriage doesn't count?
just kidding hon
Marriage doesn't count?
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. A condition which manifests itself after people are exposed to traumatic stress. Being a psychiatrist who counsels PTSD patients isn't traumatic stress. You can't "catch" PTSD from other victims. "Dr." Hasan had not undergone any, repeat any, traumatic stress.
Hearing people tell stories about what it's like to have their friends blown to pieces is not the same as having your friends blown to pieces. "Dr." Hasan is an MD who specializes in mental illness and disorders. His duties with patients (the ones he didn't argue with) in no way explain or condone his behavior last Thursday. This talk of pre-PTSD is from people who either through ignorance or malice are trying to explain away his actions.
Amen. If he was incabale of fulfilling his duties as a psychiatrist perhaps he should have been a proctologist or some other specialty. He made the choice and i might add was being paid rather well for his work.
Another day, and the news doesn't get any better. I guess we already knew he was a neon sign, but with each piece of evidence about his history, the sign gets a little bigger.
Who said anything about not being able to criticise Muslim killers? It's a little odd to look at people who thought your comments were bigoted and automatically assume that they're defending the killer somehow. I'm just pointing out the very notable difference between saying that he did this because he's a Muslim (which is undeniably bigoted) and saying that he did this because he's a psycho Muslim. Take note of what phrase I was nitpicking about when I jumped into the conversation:So setting the record straight against inaccurate charges is "reactionary." Hmmm. So much for a free flow of ideas. You are evidentlly so consumed with moral equivalence and politically correct cant that it's impossible (in your mind) to offer any criticism of Muslim killers.
I absolutely agree with this half of your argument. And I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who doesn't. Assuming that the Army knew about his connections/activities, there is no exuse on their part.". . .the whole complain about PC thing is an excuse." An excuse for what, continuing to look the other way at a Muslim nutball in the heart of America's Army? Ask yourself this: if "Dr." Hasan had been spouting white power nonsense, dropping N-bombs, going to David Duke meetings, wearing SA uniforms in his off duty time, etc. How long to you think it would have taken the Army to get rid of him? Well, that's how long the Army should have taken to bust this guy back to his recruiter's office. And it's clear that because he is a Muslim, they didn't.
Transplanting our conversation from the other thread:
Who said anything about not being able to criticise Muslim killers? It's a little odd to look at people who thought your comments were bigoted and automatically assume that they're defending the killer somehow. I'm just pointing out the very notable difference between saying that he did this because he's a Muslim (which is undeniably bigoted) and saying that he did this because he's a psycho Muslim. Take note of what phrase I was nitpicking about when I jumped into the conversation:
"And adherants of Islamism believe they need to kill as many Americans as possible"
You've explained yourself on it, and that's fine. I'm just saying that my jumping in had nothing to do with anyone defending the criminal or preventing you from criticising him because that is not in any way what is happening.
I absolutely agree with this half of your argument. And I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who doesn't. Assuming that the Army knew about his connections/activities, there is no exuse on their part.
Your last sentence is an interesting one. Do we really know why they didn't do anything? I suppose there's a myriad of reasons, including your PC reasoning. Were they trying to build a case for a court marshall and run out of time? Was it really a PC issue? Did they perhaps not know the full extent of his activities? I haven't been paying enough attention to the aftermath to know what they did and didn't know about him, so I am looking for clarification there.
It could be infiltration via recruiting assets with special access to enemy facilities. Part of espionage is seeking recruits with ideological sympathies to steal secrets, plant false clues, commit sabotage, create subversive cells, etc.
He's a mass murderer either way, but perhaps he is quite literally an enemy agent, or perhaps he is a sort of horrible "wanna be." Or... maybe he just flipped his wig.