What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Lindsey Graham risks offending the knuckledraggers.

edit: sorry, wrong thread. I got my deathers and birthers mixed up. So many crazies to sort through.
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

To enroll in any government health care program? Even then, a photo ID helps to prove its really you. At any rate, why reject an amendment asking that photo ID be required as further proof of identity?

We could do retina scans and DNA testing also. I think the point is, how much documentation do you need before the cure becomes more trouble than the problem. If somebody is going to go through the trouble of faking their birth certificate, wouldn't they be just as likely to fake a photo ID? :confused:

More on the state public option:

http://www.politico.com/livepulse/1009/The_Carper_onepager.html?showall

Looks like states would apply to set up with some seed capital money, then would have to be self sufficient. Would need approval from gov and legislature. So, what other objections would there be to this?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Lindsey Graham risks offending the knuckledraggers.

edit: sorry, wrong thread. I got my deathers and birthers mixed up. So many crazies to sort through.

I never thought I would say this but...way to go Lindsey Graham!
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

That's because you already have to produce a birth certificate as proof of your identity. Next.


Moving on from talk show discussion points, there's a proposal from Sen Carper to allow the public option on a statewide basis - if the state chooses to do so. So, it would be up to each one whether or not to enact it without being required to do so. That seems like a good idea to me. Wondering what the objections might be....

is there a part of that bill which now allows states to print their own hard currency??

"One Barney Bill

Backed by the full faith and credit of the People's Republic of Massachusetts"

:D
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Looks like states would apply to set up with some seed capital money, then would have to be self sufficient. Would need approval from gov and legislature. So, what other objections would there be to this?

Why do we need the federal gov't to enact state law?!?!?! God, i mean, that's the big obvious one. Tenth amendment alone invalidates this one.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

We could do retina scans and DNA testing also. I think the point is, how much documentation do you need before the cure becomes more trouble than the problem. If somebody is going to go through the trouble of faking their birth certificate, wouldn't they be just as likely to fake a photo ID? :confused:

A quick photo ID check is like a no brainer. It's not like its going to cost the gov't a bunch of money to implement. Heck, you have to show a photo ID to fly nowadays, and that's for US Citizens. What's the big deal about not wanting to do the extra step to try and verify an immigrant's status?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

A quick photo ID check is like a no brainer. It's not like its going to cost the gov't a bunch of money to implement. Heck, you have to show a photo ID to fly nowadays, and that's for US Citizens. What's the big deal about not wanting to do the extra step to try and verify an immigrant's status?

I understand what you are saying but how are you going to deal with all the people who do not have photo id like kids? Birth certificate covers everyone.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

I understand what you are saying but how are you going to deal with all the people who do not have photo id like kids? Birth certificate covers everyone.

screw 'em! ;)
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

I understand what you are saying but how are you going to deal with all the people who do not have photo id like kids? Birth certificate covers everyone.

My kids have passports, so we're good.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

I understand what you are saying but how are you going to deal with all the people who do not have photo id like kids? Birth certificate covers everyone.

C'mon Les
You know they aren't going to deal with it, come one come all
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

C'mon Les
You know they aren't going to deal with it, come one come all

I think I have managed a few rants in that direction: see previous posts. It is stupid. Why waste extra time and money for more documentation. Why aren't they talking about what they will do if someone isn't documented rather than fluffing around how to find out?

And Yay to Graham for voicing what needs to be said!
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Why do we need the federal gov't to enact state law?!?!?! God, i mean, that's the big obvious one. Tenth amendment alone invalidates this one.

Ummm...sparky, its voluntary. The feds aren't forcing the states to do a public option. They're making some upfront capital available IF the governor and the legislature choose to do so. Again, what's the problem with that? Say you like in a state called Knuckledraggerland, with Gov. Neanderthal, Speaker Caveman and Senate President Neoconartist. Obviously for ideological reasons these people aren't going to enact a public option.

Photo ID is a right wing excuse to deny people something, be it health care, voting rights, etc. As has been said, everybody has a birth certificate. Unless there's massive instances of fraud that requires something additional for verification, what exactly is the point of adding more costs and layers of paperwork?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Photo ID is a right wing excuse to deny people something, be it health care, voting rights, etc. As has been said, everybody has a birth certificate. Unless there's massive instances of fraud that requires something additional for verification, what exactly is the point of adding more costs and layers of paperwork?

It's more of an issue of some form of verification. I don't care what kind, and I'll take your word for it that they have to show a birth certificate.

But I still get a little wierded out when I show up to vote and just say my name and they check me off without any proof whatsoever that I am who I say I am. (They might ask me to confirm my address, but that's not exactly hard information to find/make up).
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

But I still get a little wierded out when I show up to vote and just say my name and they check me off without any proof whatsoever that I am who I say I am. (They might ask me to confirm my address, but that's not exactly hard information to find/make up).

Me too.

I understand the aversion to mandates of documentation -- an invitation to disenfranchisement in the form of endless polling station litigation (challenge everybody at polling stations in neighborhoods where you want to drive the vote down and just slow down the throughput).

But it does creep me out that anybody could claim to be me as long as they know my address.
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Photo ID is a right wing excuse to deny people something, be it health care, voting rights, etc. As has been said, everybody has a birth certificate. Unless there's massive instances of fraud that requires something additional for verification, what exactly is the point of adding more costs and layers of paperwork?

You really need to step outside of the Ministry of Truth for a little fresh air once in a while.

Everyone has photo ID and its the only way to demonstrate you are who you are. Any HS frosh that has messed with ID's can attest to this.

OTOH, leave it to the Dems to come up with "Motor Voter", et al, in order to recruit more of the weak-minded by promising utopia, jobs and all the mary jane you can smoke in a month - for FREE!!

ETA...and let's not forget ACORN and similar leftist efforts like handing out free smokes to bums on the street and nips of Jack to the peeps on reservations in exchange for votes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: XYZ
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

Photo ID is a right wing excuse to deny people something, be it health care, voting rights, etc. As has been said, everybody has a birth certificate. Unless there's massive instances of fraud that requires something additional for verification, what exactly is the point of adding more costs and layers of paperwork?

You have to be kidding me. I really hope you don't actually believe that. Photo ID is such a basic requirement for so many things in life. It's nothing more the proving you are who you say you are. It's not like anyone over 18 years old (who isn't a complete lazyass) doesn't have either a driver's license or a free state ID card.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

You really need to step outside of the Ministry of Truth for a little fresh air once in a while.

Everyone has photo ID and its the only way to demonstrate you are who you are. Any HS frosh that has messed with ID's can attest to this.

OTOH, leave it to the Dems to come up with "Motor Voter", et al, in order to recruit more of the weak-minded by promising utopia, jobs and all the mary jane you can smoke in a month - for FREE!!

ETA...and let's not forget ACORN and similar leftist efforts like handing out free smokes to bums on the street and nips of Jack to the peeps on reservations in exchange for votes.

You really need to take a vacation or have a stiff drink. You're way too wound up and I fear I may have to call the secret service on you again. :eek:

Regarding photo ID's Kep and Uno for voting, while its certainly possible to use someone else's address, the problem is how would you know if 1) that person already voted or 2) if they were in line behind you waiting to vote. Either way, you're under arrest if you get that wrong. Its certainly possible to do "cemetery voting" as in you impersonate a recently deceased person who's still on the rolls, but really, how widespread would anything like that be? You always hear stories but I'm not sure there's been too many actual cases. IIRC absentee ballots actually have a higher rate of fraud.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

You have to be kidding me. I really hope you don't actually believe that. Photo ID is such a basic requirement for so many things in life. It's nothing more the proving you are who you say you are. It's not like anyone over 18 years old (who isn't a complete lazyass) doesn't have either a driver's license or a free state ID card.

You're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist in any widespread form, so I question the true motives of anybody pushing this. Show me where massive amounts of fraudulent votes are making it into the system because of people without photo ID? You and people you know may have one, but not everybody does. Why then are we making it harder for people to exercise their right to vote? Say you do start requiring photo ID's. What photos are allowed? Only current licenses? What if you move from out of state? What if you move within a state? Usually they put a sticker on the back of your license with your new address, while the old one is still on the front. Do we then disqualify those people from voting???

On the other hand, some politicians push this for nefarious reasons. I'd rather not play into their hands.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

You're trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist in any widespread form.

It doesn't have to be widespread to have an effect. Between Bush in 2000 and Franken in 2008, when an election is settled by tenths, hundredths, or thousandths of a percent, every little bit helps. (Ignoring instances of widespread fraud like 1960 Chicago)

It just strikes me as odd that you need a photo ID to board a plane, may need one to buy a pizza (if paying by credit card), but then only need knowledge of 2 facts (name and address) to vote.

It's one thing if we're talking about small town or actual neighborhood voting, where the person manning the rolls really could know everyone and not need a photo ID. But in any city of actual size where a single polling station will see 10,000+ voters, seems like something more should be required.
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - Part 2 - Deathers vs. Commies

You're way too wound up and I fear I may have to call the secret service on you again.

Please do. We all got a chuckle here in the office after your first call. Speaker phones are fun.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top