Has anyone heard about Tyler Heinonen. I am hopeful all is ok and will be back in the lineup for the BG series.
Mel P show notes:
Mel did some scoreboard watching this weekend and some recruiting - watching high school games
BGSU has not lost WCHA game at home yet
Heinonen is questionable for the weekend - wont hurry him back in the lineup - looks like possibly a one bid league due to non-conference - so need him for the month long stretch towards the end of the season
Doesn't look like Jake Jackson will be available either - sickness and injury in practice - getting thin upfront
Looking at season as 2 segments left - 4 games then bye and then final 6 game push
Questions for Mel:
Does a tie impact PWR?
It does - goes in as half a win half a loss - helps to tie a better team.
Mel thinks a lot of people have questions - UMD under 500 - how can they be ahead of Tech? A lot breaks down into formula - common opp., against other leagues.
NCHC has better opportunities to get bonus points, playing the teams they play each week.
Can you talk about scheduling for next year or two? Will we see UMD in Houghton?
We have icebreaker in 2 years. Working on a possible home and home with UMD. Both sides want to do it, about finding right dates. Maybe Thur/Sat home and home or diff weekends.
Next year we go to Michigan, we go to Michigan State - Mel doesn't want to add road games. That gets us to 34 - we have extra games (AK). Maybe a tournament we could go to right after GLI. Have talked to a few teams about those remaining games.
UMD in a similar boat with a lot of road games next year, not looking for more. Makes home and home the possible solution.
We have both AKs next year so more possible games if we want.
Following year, Wisconsin in Houghton, Arizona State in Houghton. Need home/away balance.
Yes, at Mich and MSU next year, we've talked to Notre Dames, SCSU, UND, Minnesota - a lot of conversation going on for remaining games.
Tried to gauge how much time off to give guys - still stay focused - practiced Mon Tues, Wed/Thur off
Mel was in MN for high school hockey, happy he did, made a couple offers to kids
Watched Houghton and Hancock and Green Bay area teams play here in UP
Team practiced some things we wouldn't normally do Fri/Sat/Sun, also had some recruits in town
Players had some time off, but coaches were busy
Get some more pts for Neville? He's so good defensively, PK, blocking shots. Have talked about expanding his offensive game.
CJ Eick and Reid Sturos on one goal, they'll get some more. Want to get them going.
Defensive group is playing well, turnovers are down
Watson/Auk, Birks/Leibinger - helps to be more rounded defensively
We'll leave Wed go part way and we have practice at BGSU Thur at 5 - have to have a great weekend
My takeaways from Mel P show:
Boeing would be playing quite a bit with a few Forwards injured.
Some good info on scheduling next few seasons. I'm starting to wonder if Mel wishes he should've used his last two games to find an opponent this season. Using 1 for a Canadian school and not using the other would've been another chance to improve PWR, depending on who you could schedule. If AK trips allow us to schedule more non conference, why not use it as a chance to improve PWR.
I do know that Mike Corbett here at UAH told boosters that he wasn't going to play 38 games in a season again unless it meant something, given what that did to us in 13-14. I don't think that Tech would have as much of a problem, as they always seem to have better depth. We just ran out of legs (and admittedly not great ones at that). Not having the rest for guys is a risk, but I think that Mel is probably thinking the right thing here.
GFM
If we want to keep playing LSSU make them the early season tune up games and eliminate the "Canadian Whoevers". If Damon can get LSSU on track at least those games have a chance to mean something in a few years. Don't play LSSU as non-conference at the expense of another "good" series.
I agree that I've had my fill of Michigan and Sparty for a while. It was cool when it was the "first time in XX years" but now they are just old news again. The GLI will be there for the near future so no reason to play them outside those games.
Ryan J
From mtu_huskies recap of the Pearson show, he never mentions playing LSSU non-conference next year? He says the series at Michigan and at State will get them up to 34, and that number includes the GLI.
From what I heard at the beginning of the year, the non-conference between Tech and LSSU would only be done if both teams were in need of games.
I thought it was set that NMU or LSSU would play LSSU in non-conference every season that they didn't play 4 times in conference. That starts next season for MTU. I'll look into it.
It's a difficult problem: Scheduling LSSU etc is a cost containment move for both schools and makes sense if you can fit them in, especially in the years you only play them 2 times. I think having a couple of bye weeks is a good thing also..
If Duluth is willing to do a home and home... great. That's a good non con game, but it's tough getting them regularly because everyone wants them.
I like that we are doing the ice breaker in two years. It seems to me that's an attempt to get away from the b1g. Though I have to admit it was really great to be able to go to Munn and see them. There were more Tech fans than MSU fans.
I don't have a problem continuing a deal with Michigan/MSU on a 1 for 1 basis in alternating years or a year 1/2 MSU, 3/4 Michigan setup...but with the GLI and the fact that the 4th team is going to involve the WCHA regularly now, we need to focus our NC on the other 48 teams...not the same 11 teams. As much as it hurts, they need to try and schedule the NCHC, or in the right years, do 2 year home/home deals with eastern teams. Overall, I really like the thought of trying to participate in the GLI and another tournament each year, whether its in Arizona, Minneapolis, Florida or the icebreaker, it gives MTU the chance to play more teams and with playing 2 different teams, its more likely one of them will result in a possible QWB (Yale, Michigan). In all honesty, if ASU figured out a more appropriately sized rink, I'd love for MTU to become the Michigan or Michigan State of that tournament.
I'd agree with you about the Desert Classic. So many tech fans there compared to the rest, just the venue doesn't work. Would have no issue going there regularly, it was a good trip.
When you refer to the venue do you just mean the size? Are there options in the area?
There are some options, but I don't really think any of them work. They really need an Amsoil size rink on campus or at least near campus to do it right...not sure what their future plans are. I know there has been alot of talk about the Coyotes moving out of glendale and moving east of downtown closer Mesa, which could make it an option for ASU, but an NHL building is just going to be too big, especially if students don't come. I don't seem them drawing enough to warrant even having the whole lower bowl open in an NHL sized rink.